Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Unsupervised or Indirectly Supervised Learning


Style Feature Extraction Using Contrastive Conditioned Variational Autoencoders with Mutual Information Constraints

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Extracting fine-grained features such as styles from unlabeled data is crucial for data analysis. Unsupervised methods such as variational autoencoders (VAEs) can extract styles that are usually mixed with other features. Conditional VAEs (CVAEs) can isolate styles using class labels; however, there are no established methods to extract only styles using unlabeled data. In this paper, we propose a CVAE-based method that extracts style features using only unlabeled data. The proposed model consists of a contrastive learning (CL) part that extracts style-independent features and a CVAE part that extracts style features. The CL model learns representations independent of data augmentation, which can be viewed as a perturbation in styles, in a self-supervised manner. Considering the style-independent features from the pretrained CL model as a condition, the CVAE learns to extract only styles. Additionally, we introduce a constraint based on mutual information between the CL and VAE features to prevent the CVAE from ignoring the condition. Experiments conducted using two simple datasets, MNIST and an original dataset based on Google Fonts, demonstrate that the proposed method can efficiently extract style features. Further experiments using real-world natural image datasets were also conducted to illustrate the method's extendability.


Active Semi-Supervised Learning by Exploring Per-Sample Uncertainty and Consistency

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Active Learning (AL) and Semi-supervised Learning are two techniques that have been studied to reduce the high cost of deep learning by using a small amount of labeled data and a large amount of unlabeled data. To improve the accuracy of models at a lower cost, we propose a method called Active Semi-supervised Learning (ASSL), which combines AL and SSL. To maximize the synergy between AL and SSL, we focused on the differences between ASSL and AL. ASSL involves more dynamic model updates than AL due to the use of unlabeled data in the training process, resulting in the temporal instability of the predicted probabilities of the unlabeled data. This makes it difficult to determine the true uncertainty of the unlabeled data in ASSL. To address this, we adopted techniques such as exponential moving average (EMA) and upper confidence bound (UCB) used in reinforcement learning. Additionally, we analyzed the effect of label noise on unsupervised learning by using weak and strong augmentation pairs to address datainconsistency. By considering both uncertainty and datainconsistency, we acquired data samples that were used in the proposed ASSL method. Our experiments showed that ASSL achieved about 5.3 times higher computational efficiency than SSL while achieving the same performance, and it outperformed the state-of-the-art AL method.


SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learning

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The critical challenge of Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) is how to effectively leverage the limited labeled data and massive unlabeled data to improve the model's generalization performance. In this paper, we first revisit the popular pseudo-labeling methods via a unified sample weighting formulation and demonstrate the inherent quantity-quality trade-off problem of pseudo-labeling with thresholding, which may prohibit learning. To this end, we propose SoftMatch to overcome the trade-off by maintaining both high quantity and high quality of pseudo-labels during training, effectively exploiting the unlabeled data. We derive a truncated Gaussian function to weight samples based on their confidence, which can be viewed as a soft version of the confidence threshold. We further enhance the utilization of weakly-learned classes by proposing a uniform alignment approach. In experiments, SoftMatch shows substantial improvements across a wide variety of benchmarks, including image, text, and imbalanced classification. The main challenge of SSL lies in how to effectively exploit the information of unlabeled data to improve the model's generalization performance (Chapelle et al., 2006). Among the efforts, pseudo-labeling (Lee et al., 2013; Arazo et al., 2020) with confidence thresholding (Xie et al., 2020; Sohn et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021b; Zhang et al., 2021) is highly-successful and widely-adopted. The core idea of threshold-based pseudo-labeling (Xie et al., 2020; Sohn et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021b; Zhang et al., 2021) is to train the model with pseudo-label whose prediction confidence is above a hard threshold, with the others being simply ignored. However, such a mechanism inherently exhibits the quantity-quality trade-off, which undermines the learning process. On the one hand, a high confidence threshold as exploited in FixMatch (Sohn et al., 2020) ensures the quality of the pseudo-labels.


Exploring the World of Machine Learning: 35+ Types of Problems and How MLOps Can Boost Your Business

#artificialintelligence

MLOps is concerned with the management and deployment of machine learning models, regardless of the type of problem being solved. MLOps practices can be applied to various machine learning problems, including supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, reinforcement, transfer, online, multi-task ensemble learning, active learning, and batch learning. To effectively implement MLOps, it is important to clearly understand the different types of machine learning problems and how they can be applied to different business scenarios. For example, a supervised learning problem might predict customer churn based on past behaviour data. In contrast, an unsupervised learning problem might be used to identify patterns in customer behaviour that can inform targeted marketing efforts.


The System Description of dun_oscar team for The ICPR MSR Challenge

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

This paper introduces the system submitted by dun_oscar team for the ICPR MSR Challenge. Three subsystems for task1-task3 are descripted respectively. In task1, we develop a visual system which includes a OCR model, a text tracker, and a NLP classifier for distinguishing subtitles and non-subtitles. In task2, we employ an ASR system which includes an AM with 18 layers and a 4-gram LM. Semi-supervised learning on unlabeled data is also vital. In task3, we employ the ASR system to improve the visual system, some false subtitles can be corrected by a fusion module.


InPL: Pseudo-labeling the Inliers First for Imbalanced Semi-supervised Learning

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Recent state-of-the-art methods in imbalanced semi-supervised learning (SSL) rely on confidence-based pseudo-labeling with consistency regularization. To obtain high-quality pseudo-labels, a high confidence threshold is typically adopted. However, it has been shown that softmax-based confidence scores in deep networks can be arbitrarily high for samples far from the training data, and thus, the pseudo-labels for even high-confidence unlabeled samples may still be unreliable. In this work, we present a new perspective of pseudo-labeling for imbalanced SSL. Without relying on model confidence, we propose to measure whether an unlabeled sample is likely to be "in-distribution"; i.e., close to the current training data. To decide whether an unlabeled sample is "in-distribution" or "out-of-distribution", we adopt the energy score from out-of-distribution detection literature. As training progresses and more unlabeled samples become in-distribution and contribute to training, the combined labeled and pseudo-labeled data can better approximate the true class distribution to improve the model. Experiments demonstrate that our energy-based pseudo-labeling method, InPL, albeit conceptually simple, significantly outperforms confidence-based methods on imbalanced SSL benchmarks. For example, it produces around 3% absolute accuracy improvement on CIFAR10-LT. When combined with state-of-the-art long-tailed SSL methods, further improvements are attained. In particular, in one of the most challenging scenarios, InPL achieves a 6.9% accuracy improvement over the best competitor. In recent years, the frontier of semi-supervised learning (SSL) has seen significant advances through pseudo-labeling (Rosenberg et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2013) combined with consistency regularization (Laine & Aila, 2017; Tarvainen & Valpola, 2017; Berthelot et al., 2020; Sohn et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2020a).


Visuomotor Control in Multi-Object Scenes Using Object-Aware Representations

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Perceptual understanding of the scene and the relationship between its different components is important for successful completion of robotic tasks. Representation learning has been shown to be a powerful technique for this, but most of the current methodologies learn task specific representations that do not necessarily transfer well to other tasks. Furthermore, representations learned by supervised methods require large labeled datasets for each task that are expensive to collect in the real world. Using self-supervised learning to obtain representations from unlabeled data can mitigate this problem. However, current self-supervised representation learning methods are mostly object agnostic, and we demonstrate that the resulting representations are insufficient for general purpose robotics tasks as they fail to capture the complexity of scenes with many components. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of using object-aware representation learning techniques for robotic tasks. Our self-supervised representations are learned by observing the agent freely interacting with different parts of the environment and is queried in two different settings: (i) policy learning and (ii) object location prediction. We show that our model learns control policies in a sample-efficient manner and outperforms state-of-the-art object agnostic techniques as well as methods trained on raw RGB images. Our results show a 20 percent increase in performance in low data regimes (1000 trajectories) in policy training using implicit behavioral cloning (IBC). Furthermore, our method outperforms the baselines for the task of object localization in multi-object scenes.


Generative Modeling Helps Weak Supervision (and Vice Versa)

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Many promising applications of supervised machine learning face hurdles in the acquisition of labeled data in sufficient quantity and quality, creating an expensive bottleneck. To overcome such limitations, techniques that do not depend on ground truth labels have been studied, including weak supervision and generative modeling. While these techniques would seem to be usable in concert, improving one another, how to build an interface between them is not well-understood. In this work, we propose a model fusing programmatic weak supervision and generative adversarial networks and provide theoretical justification motivating this fusion. The proposed approach captures discrete latent variables in the data alongside the weak supervision derived label estimate. Alignment of the two allows for better modeling of sample-dependent accuracies of the weak supervision sources, improving the estimate of unobserved labels. It is the first approach to enable data augmentation through weakly supervised synthetic images and pseudolabels. Additionally, its learned latent variables can be inspected qualitatively. The model outperforms baseline weak supervision label models on a number of multiclass image classification datasets, improves the quality of generated images, and further improves end-model performance through data augmentation with synthetic samples. How can we get the most out of data when we do not have ground truth labels? Two prominent paradigms operate in this setting. First, programmatic weak supervision frameworks use weak sources of training signal to train downstream supervised models, without needing access to groundtruth labels (Riedel et al., 2010; Ratner et al., 2016; Dehghani et al., 2017; Lang & Poon, 2021). Second, generative models enable learning data distributions which can benefit downstream tasks, e.g. Intuitively, these two paradigms should complement each other, as each can be thought of as a different approach to extracting structure from unlabeled data. However, to date there is no simple way to combine them. Fusing generative models with weak supervision holds substantial promise. For example, it could yield large reductions in data acquisition costs for training complex models. Programmatic weak supervision replaces the need for manual annotations by applying so-called labeling functions to unlabeled data, producing weak labels that are combined into a pseudolabel for each sample.


Semi-supervised Adversarial Learning for Complementary Item Recommendation

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Complementary item recommendations are a ubiquitous feature of modern e-commerce sites. Such recommendations are highly effective when they are based on collaborative signals like co-purchase statistics. In certain online marketplaces, however, e.g., on online auction sites, constantly new items are added to the catalog. In such cases, complementary item recommendations are often based on item side-information due to a lack of interaction data. In this work, we propose a novel approach that can leverage both item side-information and labeled complementary item pairs to generate effective complementary recommendations for cold items, i.e., for items for which no co-purchase statistics yet exist. Given that complementary items typically have to be of a different category than the seed item, we technically maintain a latent space for each item category. Simultaneously, we learn to project distributed item representations into these category spaces to determine suitable recommendations. The main learning process in our architecture utilizes labeled pairs of complementary items. In addition, we adopt ideas from Cycle Generative Adversarial Networks (CycleGAN) to leverage available item information even in case no labeled data exists for a given item and category. Experiments on three e-commerce datasets show that our method is highly effective.


Masked Unsupervised Self-training for Label-free Image Classification

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

State-of-the-art computer vision models are mostly trained with supervised learning using human-labeled images, which limits their scalability due to the expensive annotation cost. While self-supervised representation learning has achieved impressive progress, it still requires a second stage of finetuning on labeled data. On the other hand, models pre-trained with large-scale text-image supervision (e.g., CLIP) have enabled zero-shot transfer to downstream image classification tasks. However, the zero-shot performance of CLIP-like models are often insufficient for real-world adoption. In this paper, we aim to leverage the abundant unlabeled data from a target domain to improve the performance of a pre-trained zero-shot classifier, by unsupervised finetuning of the pre-trained model. We propose Masked Unsupervised Self-Training (MUST), a new unsupervised adaptation method which leverages two different and complementary sources of training signals: pseudo-labels and raw images. MUST jointly optimizes three objectives to learn both class-level global feature and pixel-level local feature and enforces a regularization between the two. We demonstrate the efficacy of MUST on a variety of downstream tasks, where it improves upon CLIP by a large margin. MUST also outperforms supervised few-shot adaptation methods. It achieves a top-1 accuracy of 77.7% on ImageNet using ViT-B, +9.4% higher than CLIP, and +6.2% higher than 16-shot CLIP adaptation. Our code is available at https://github.com/salesforce/MUST.