One of the challenges in model-based control of stochastic dynamical systems is that the state transition dynamics are involved, and it is not easy or efficient to make good-quality predictions of the states. Moreover, there are not many representational models for the majority of autonomous systems, as it is not easy to build a compact model that captures the entire dynamical subtleties and uncertainties. In this work, we present a hierarchical Bayesian linear regression model with local features to learn the dynamics of a micro-robotic system as well as two simpler examples, consisting of a stochastic mass-spring damper and a stochastic double inverted pendulum on a cart. The model is hierarchical since we assume non-stationary priors for the model parameters. These non-stationary priors make the model more flexible by imposing priors on the priors of the model. To solve the maximum likelihood (ML) problem for this hierarchical model, we use the variational expectation maximization (EM) algorithm, and enhance the procedure by introducing hidden target variables. The algorithm yields parsimonious model structures, and consistently provides fast and accurate predictions for all our examples involving large training and test sets. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the method in learning stochastic dynamics, which makes it suitable for future use in a paradigm, such as model-based reinforcement learning, to compute optimal control policies in real time.

Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) is a fully Bayesian approach to modeling with ensembles of trees. BART can uncover complex regression functions with high dimensional regressors in a fairly automatic way and provide Bayesian quantification of the uncertainty through the posterior. However, BART assumes IID normal errors. This strong parametric assumption can lead to misleading inference and uncertainty quantification. In this paper, we use the classic Dirichlet process mixture (DPM) mechanism to nonparametrically model the error distribution. A key strength of BART is that default prior settings work reasonably well in a variety of problems. The challenge in extending BART is to choose the parameters of the DPM so that the strengths of the standard BART approach is not lost when the errors are close to normal, but the DPM has the ability to adapt to non-normal errors.

We revisit logistic regression and its nonlinear extensions, including multilayer feedforward neural networks, by showing that these classifiers can be viewed as converting input or higher-level features into Dempster-Shafer mass functions and aggregating them by Dempster's rule of combination. The probabilistic outputs of these classifiers are the normalized plausibilities corresponding to the underlying combined mass function. This mass function is more informative than the output probability distribution. In particular, it makes it possible to distinguish between lack of evidence (when none of the features provides discriminant information) from conflicting evidence (when different features support different classes). This expressivity of mass functions allows us to gain insight into the role played by each input feature in logistic regression, and to interpret hidden unit outputs in multilayer neural networks. It also makes it possible to use alternative decision rules, such as interval dominance, which select a set of classes when the available evidence does not unambiguously point to a single class, thus trading reduced error rate for higher imprecision.

It covers both the theoretical aspects of Statisticalconcepts and the practical implementation using R. Real life examples: Every concept is explained with the help of examples, case studies and source code in R wherever necessary. The examples cover a wide array of topics and range from A/B testing in an Internet company context to the Capital Asset Pricing Model in a quant finance context. What you will learn Harness R and R packages to read, process and visualize data Understand linear regression and use it confidently to build models Understand the intricacies of all the different data structures in R Use Linear regression in R to overcome the difficulties of LINEST() in Excel Draw inferences from data and support them using tests of significance Use descriptive statistics to perform a quick study of some data and present results Click here To join us for more information, get in touch keep enhancing Complete iOS 11 Machine Learning Masterclass 3. If you want to learn how to start building professional, career-boosting mobile apps and use Machine Learning to take things to the next level, then this course is for you. The Complete iOS Machine Learning Masterclass is the only course that you need for machine learning on iOS. Machine Learning is a fast-growing field that is revolutionizing many industries with tech giants like Google and IBM taking the lead. In this course, you'll use the most cutting-edge iOS Machine Learning technology stacks to add a layer of intelligence and polish to your mobile apps. We're approaching a new era where only apps and games that are considered "smart" will survive.

Methods for reasoning under uncertainty are a key building block of accurate and reliable machine learning systems. Bayesian methods provide a general framework to quantify uncertainty. However, because of model misspecification and the use of approximate inference, Bayesian uncertainty estimates are often inaccurate -- for example, a 90% credible interval may not contain the true outcome 90% of the time. Here, we propose a simple procedure for calibrating any regression algorithm; when applied to Bayesian and probabilistic models, it is guaranteed to produce calibrated uncertainty estimates given enough data. Our procedure is inspired by Platt scaling and extends previous work on classification. We evaluate this approach on Bayesian linear regression, feedforward, and recurrent neural networks, and find that it consistently outputs well-calibrated credible intervals while improving performance on time series forecasting and model-based reinforcement learning tasks.

We develop a theory for estimation of a high-dimensional sparse parameter $\theta$ defined as a minimizer of a population loss function $L_D(\theta,g_0)$ which, in addition to $\theta$, depends on a, potentially infinite dimensional, nuisance parameter $g_0$. Our approach is based on estimating $\theta$ via an $\ell_1$-regularized minimization of a sample analog of $L_S(\theta, \hat{g})$, plugging in a first-stage estimate $\hat{g}$, computed on a hold-out sample. We define a population loss to be (Neyman) orthogonal if the gradient of the loss with respect to $\theta$, has pathwise derivative with respect to $g$ equal to zero, when evaluated at the true parameter and nuisance component. We show that orthogonality implies a second-order impact of the first stage nuisance error on the second stage target parameter estimate. Our approach applies to both convex and non-convex losses, albeit the latter case requires a small adaptation of our method with a preliminary estimation step of the target parameter. Our result enables oracle convergence rates for $\theta$ under assumptions on the first stage rates, typically of the order of $n^{-1/4}$. We show how such an orthogonal loss can be constructed via a novel orthogonalization process for a general model defined by conditional moment restrictions. We apply our theory to high-dimensional versions of standard estimation problems in statistics and econometrics, such as: estimation of conditional moment models with missing data, estimation of structural utilities in games of incomplete information and estimation of treatment effects in regression models with non-linear link functions.

In machine learning, there's something called the "No Free Lunch" theorem. In a nutshell, it states that no one algorithm works best for every problem, and it's especially relevant for supervised learning (i.e. For example, you can't say that neural networks are always better than decision trees or vice-versa. There are many factors at play, such as the size and structure of your dataset. As a result, you should try many different algorithms for your problem, while using a hold-out "test set" of data to evaluate performance and select the winner.

Despite the success of neural networks (NNs), there is still a concern among many over their "black box" nature. Why do they work? Here we present a simple analytic argument that NNs are in fact essentially polynomial regression models. This view will have various implications for NNs, e.g. providing an explanation for why convergence problems arise in NNs, and it gives rough guidance on avoiding overfitting. In addition, we use this phenomenon to predict and confirm a multicollinearity property of NNs not previously reported in the literature. Most importantly, given this loose correspondence, one may choose to routinely use polynomial models instead of NNs, thus avoiding some major problems of the latter, such as having to set many tuning parameters and dealing with convergence issues. We present a number of empirical results; in each case, the accuracy of the polynomial approach matches or exceeds that of NN approaches. A many-featured, open-source software package, polyreg, is available.

Probabilistic Bisection Algorithm performs root finding based on knowledge acquired from noisy oracle responses. We consider the generalized PBA setting (G-PBA) where the statistical distribution of the oracle is unknown and location-dependent, so that model inference and Bayesian knowledge updating must be performed simultaneously. To this end, we propose to leverage the spatial structure of a typical oracle by constructing a statistical surrogate for the underlying logistic regression step. We investigate several non-parametric surrogates, including Binomial Gaussian Processes (B-GP), Polynomial, Kernel, and Spline Logistic Regression. In parallel, we develop sampling policies that adaptively balance learning the oracle distribution and learning the root. One of our proposals mimics active learning with B-GPs and provides a novel look-ahead predictive variance formula. The resulting gains of our Spatial PBA algorithm relative to earlier G-PBA models are illustrated with synthetic examples and a challenging stochastic root finding problem from Bermudan option pricing.

A semi-parametric, non-linear regression model in the presence of latent variables is applied towards learning network graph structure. These latent variables can correspond to unmodeled phenomena or unmeasured agents in a complex system of interacting entities. This formulation jointly estimates non-linearities in the underlying data generation, the direct interactions between measured entities, and the indirect effects of unmeasured processes on the observed data. The learning is posed as regularized empirical risk minimization. Details of the algorithm for learning the model are outlined. Experiments demonstrate the performance of the learned model on real data.