Regression
Automatic Classification of Bug Reports Based on Multiple Text Information and Reports' Intention
Meng, Fanqi, Wang, Xuesong, Wang, Jingdong, Wang, Peifang
With the rapid growth of software scale and complexity, a large number of bug reports are submitted to the bug tracking system. In order to speed up defect repair, these reports need to be accurately classified so that they can be sent to the appropriate developers. However, the existing classification methods only use the text information of the bug report, which leads to their low performance. To solve the above problems, this paper proposes a new automatic classification method for bug reports. The innovation is that when categorizing bug reports, in addition to using the text information of the report, the intention of the report (i.e. suggestion or explanation) is also considered, thereby improving the performance of the classification. First, we collect bug reports from four ecosystems (Apache, Eclipse, Gentoo, Mozilla) and manually annotate them to construct an experimental data set. Then, we use Natural Language Processing technology to preprocess the data. On this basis, BERT and TF-IDF are used to extract the features of the intention and the multiple text information. Finally, the features are used to train the classifiers. The experimental result on five classifiers (including K-Nearest Neighbor, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest) show that our proposed method achieves better performance and its F-Measure achieves from 87.3% to 95.5%.
What algorithm curate machine learning
In order to address a specific problem, practitioners must select an acceptable learning algorithm. A general rule of thumb is that for classification issues, we should use algorithms with high accuracy, whereas for regression problems, we should choose algorithms with lower accuracy but higher robustness because the absolute error rate is unimportant. Here are a few examples: Linear Regression: Linear regression uses the linearity principle to predict continuous values from a set of input variables. It achieves this by minimizing the total of squared errors. This method is fast and scalable for huge data sets since it avoids iterating over all possible replies; nonetheless, it is unstable.
Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models
Syeed, Miah Mohammad Asif, Farzana, Maisha, Namir, Ishadie, Ishrar, Ipshita, Nushra, Meherin Hossain, Rahman, Tanvir
Floods are one of nature's most catastrophic calamities which cause irreversible and immense damage to human life, agriculture, infrastructure and socio-economic system. Several studies on flood catastrophe management and flood forecasting systems have been conducted. The accurate prediction of the onset and progression of floods in real time is challenging. To estimate water levels and velocities across a large area, it is necessary to combine data with computationally demanding flood propagation models. This paper aims to reduce the extreme risks of this natural disaster and also contributes to policy suggestions by providing a prediction for floods using different machine learning models. This research will use Binary Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Classifier (SVC) and Decision tree Classifier to provide an accurate prediction. With the outcome, a comparative analysis will be conducted to understand which model delivers a better accuracy.
A penalized two-pass regression to predict stock returns with time-varying risk premia
Bakalli, Gaetan, Guerrier, Stéphane, Scaillet, Olivier
Under the arbitrage pricing theory (Ross, 1976; Chamberlain and Rothschild, 1983), we know that risk premia are drivers of expected excess returns. Hence, estimating them should be useful for prediction of future equity excess returns. The workhorse to estimate equity risk premia in a linear multi-factor setting is the two-pass crosssectional regression method developed by Black et al. (1972) and Fama and MacBeth (1973). A series of papers address its large and finite sample properties for linear factor models with time-invariant coefficients; see, for example, Shanken (1985, 1992), Jagannathan and Wang (1998), Shanken and Zhou (2007), Kan et al. (2013), and the review paper of Jagannathan et al. (2010) (see Bryzgalova et al. (2019) for a recent Bayesian approach). In a time-varying setting, Gagliardini et al. (2016) (henceforth referred as GOS) study how we can infer the dynamics of equity risk premia from large stock return data sets under conditional linear factor models (see also Gagliardini
An Evidential Neural Network Model for Regression Based on Random Fuzzy Numbers
We introduce a distance-based neural network model for regression, in which prediction uncertainty is quantified by a belief function on the real line. The model interprets the distances of the input vector to prototypes as pieces of evidence represented by Gaussian random fuzzy numbers (GRFN's) and combined by the generalized product intersection rule, an operator that extends Dempster's rule to random fuzzy sets. The network output is a GRFN that can be summarized by three numbers characterizing the most plausible predicted value, variability around this value, and epistemic uncertainty. Experiments with real datasets demonstrate the very good performance of the method as compared to state-of-the-art evidential and statistical learning algorithms.
How should we proxy for race/ethnicity? Comparing Bayesian improved surname geocoding to machine learning methods
Political science research often requires constructing a race/ethnicity proxy variable for datasets that do not contain it, like voter registration files, lists of electoral candidates, or political donation records. Constructing such a proxy is an important step for conducting ecological inference in voting rights litigation (Barreto et al. [2019], Imai and Khanna [2016]), redistricting (DeLuca and Curiel [2022], Kenny et al. [2021]), and substantive research on the role of race/ethnicity in politics (Enos [2016], Enos et al. [2019], Grumbach and Sahn [2020]). The most common method for proxying race/ethnicity is Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG), which uses Bayes' rule to compute a probability distribution over race/ethnicity categories conditional on a voter's surname and where they live (Elliott et al. [2008, 2009]). BISG has attained widespread popularity due to its parsimony, computational efficiency, and superior performance when compared to existing alternatives, namely spatial interpolation of Census racial-ethnic composition from Census geographies (Imai and Khanna [2016], Clark et al. [2021], Shah and Davis [2017]). While BISG performs well compared to the small suite of existing alternatives, it has not yet been benchmarked against machine learning (ML) models, which can produce race/ethnicity predictions from more flexible and potentially more accurate models. In this paper I present the results of such a benchmark. I train a range of machine learning models using voter registration data from Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and a portion of California where voters self-report their race/ethnicity upon registration. The registries in these states contain over 26 million labelled observations, which equates to greater than a five percent non-representative sample of the United States electorate. I then compare BISG against predictions from these models made out-of-state.
Knowledge mining of unstructured information: application to cyber-domain
Takko, Tuomas, Bhattacharya, Kunal, Lehto, Martti, Jalasvirta, Pertti, Cederberg, Aapo, Kaski, Kimmo
Information on cyber-related crimes, incidents, and conflicts is abundantly available in numerous open online sources. However, processing the large volumes and streams of data is a challenging task for the analysts and experts, and entails the need for newer methods and techniques. In this article we present and implement a novel knowledge graph and knowledge mining framework for extracting the relevant information from free-form text about incidents in the cyberdomain. The framework includes a machine learning based pipeline for generating graphs of organizations, countries, industries, products and attackers with a non-technical cyber-ontology. The extracted knowledge graph is utilized to estimate the incidence of cyberattacks on a given graph configuration. We use publicly available collections of real cyber-incident reports to test the efficacy of our methods. The knowledge extraction is found to be sufficiently accurate, and the graph-based threat estimation demonstrates a level of correlation with the actual records of attacks. In practical use, an analyst utilizing the presented framework can infer additional information from the current cyber-landscape in terms of risk to various entities and propagation of the risk heuristic between industries and countries.
Intelligent decision-making method of TBM operating parameters based on multiple constraints and objective optimization
Liu, Bin, Wang, Jiwen, Wang, Ruirui, Wang, Yaxu, Zhao, Guangzu
The decision-making of TBM operating parameters has an important guiding significance for TBM safe and efficient construction, and it has been one of the research hotpots in the field of TBM tunneling. For this purpose, this paper introduces rock-breaking rules into machine learning method, and a rock-machine mapping dual-driven by physical-rule and data-mining is established with high accuracy. This dual-driven mappings are subsequently used as objective function and constraints to build a decision-making method for TBM operating parameters. By searching the revolution per minute and penetration corresponding to the extremum of the objective function subject to the constraints, the optimal operating parameters can be obtained. This method is verified in the field of the Second Water Source Channel of Hangzhou, China, resulting in the average penetration rate increased by 11.3%, and the total cost decreased by 10.0%, which proves the practicability and effectiveness of the developed decision-making model.
[100%OFF] Logistic Regression In R Studio
In this section we will learn – What does Machine Learning mean. What are the meanings or different terms associated with machine learning? You will see some examples so that you understand what machine learning actually is. It also contains steps involved in building a machine learning model, not just linear models, any machine learning model.
Beyond Linear Regression
Linear regression is among the primary/entry-level Machine Learning (ML) models. It's not even wrong to say that it's the synonym of the "Hello world" program for Data scientists. Finding the linear regression coefficients β_1, …, β_p involves finding the "best" linear combination of variables that approaches the response. Said differently, finding the coefficients that minimize the mean squared error (MSE). It's possible to endow the regression coefficients with some extra properties by considering the MSE plus an additional penalty term.