Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Gradient Descent


Gradient Descent Can Take Exponential Time to Escape Saddle Points

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Although gradient descent (GD) almost always escapes saddle points asymptotically [Lee et al., 2016], this paper shows that even with fairly natural random initialization schemes and non-pathological functions, GD can be significantly slowed down by saddle points, taking exponential time to escape. On the other hand, gradient descent with perturbations [Ge et al., 2015, Jin et al., 2017] is not slowed down by saddle points - it can find an approximate local minimizer in polynomial time. This result implies that GD is inherently slower than perturbed GD, and justifies the importance of adding perturbations for efficient non-convex optimization. While our focus is theoretical, we also present experiments that illustrate our theoretical findings.


Analysis of Approximate Stochastic Gradient Using Quadratic Constraints and Sequential Semidefinite Programs

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We present convergence rate analysis for the approximate stochastic gradient method, where individual gradient updates are corrupted by computation errors. We develop stochastic quadratic constraints to formulate a small linear matrix inequality (LMI) whose feasible set characterizes convergence properties of the approximate stochastic gradient. Based on this LMI condition, we develop a sequential minimization approach to analyze the intricate trade-offs that couple stepsize selection, convergence rate, optimization accuracy, and robustness to gradient inaccuracy. We also analytically solve this LMI condition and obtain theoretical formulas that quantify the convergence properties of the approximate stochastic gradient under various assumptions on the loss functions.


Learning One-hidden-layer Neural Networks with Landscape Design

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We consider the problem of learning a one-hidden-layer neural network: we assume the input $x\in \mathbb{R}^d$ is from Gaussian distribution and the label $y = a^\top \sigma(Bx) + \xi$, where $a$ is a nonnegative vector in $\mathbb{R}^m$ with $m\le d$, $B\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times d}$ is a full-rank weight matrix, and $\xi$ is a noise vector. We first give an analytic formula for the population risk of the standard squared loss and demonstrate that it implicitly attempts to decompose a sequence of low-rank tensors simultaneously. Inspired by the formula, we design a non-convex objective function $G(\cdot)$ whose landscape is guaranteed to have the following properties: 1. All local minima of $G$ are also global minima. 2. All global minima of $G$ correspond to the ground truth parameters. 3. The value and gradient of $G$ can be estimated using samples. With these properties, stochastic gradient descent on $G$ provably converges to the global minimum and learn the ground-truth parameters. We also prove finite sample complexity result and validate the results by simulations.


Stochastic Gradient Descent in Continuous Time: A Central Limit Theorem

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Stochastic gradient descent in continuous time (SGDCT) provides a computationally efficient method for the statistical learning of continuous-time models, which are widely used in science, engineering, and finance. The SGDCT algorithm follows a (noisy) descent direction along a continuous stream of data. The parameter updates occur in continuous time and satisfy a stochastic differential equation. This paper analyzes the asymptotic convergence rate of the SGDCT algorithm by proving a central limit theorem for strongly convex objective functions and, under slightly stronger conditions, for non-convex objective functions as well. An L$^p$ convergence rate is also proven for the algorithm in the strongly convex case.


Integration of Graphs and Representation Learning

AAAI Conferences

Integrating information from many different data sources to provide better situational awareness is an essential Navy issue. Many data fusion models use statistical methods to reduce statistical errors. Machine learning and big data provide, on the other hand, provides a unique framework for information fusion through our ability to learn what added benefits a different modality can provide. In this work, we provide a novel data fusion method that integrates relational data, provided to us in the form of a graph, and image data. We build an energy model that learns a representation of the data where different data sources are assumed to be similar using a graphical model. The energy model is a non-convex function which we optimize using stochastic gradient descent with momentum. The effectiveness of the model is demonstrated in an automated target recognition example.


Stochastic variance reduced multiplicative update for nonnegative matrix factorization

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF), a dimensionality reduction and factor analysis method, is a special case in which factor matrices have low-rank nonnegative constraints. Considering the stochastic learning in NMF, we specifically address the multiplicative update (MU) rule, which is the most popular, but which has slow convergence property. This present paper introduces on the stochastic MU rule a variance-reduced technique of stochastic gradient. Numerical comparisons suggest that our proposed algorithms robustly outperform state-of-the-art algorithms across different synthetic and real-world datasets.


Learning to Draw Samples with Amortized Stein Variational Gradient Descent

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We propose a simple algorithm to train stochastic neural networks to draw samples from given target distributions for probabilistic inference. Our method is based on iteratively adjusting the neural network parameters so that the output changes along a Stein variational gradient direction (Liu & Wang, 2016) that maximally decreases the KL divergence with the target distribution. Our method works for any target distribution specified by their unnormalized density function, and can train any black-box architectures that are differentiable in terms of the parameters we want to adapt. We demonstrate our method with a number of applications, including variational autoencoder (VAE) with expressive encoders to model complex latent space structures, and hyper-parameter learning of MCMC samplers that allows Bayesian inference to adaptively improve itself when seeing more data.


Two Methods For Wild Variational Inference

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Variational inference provides a powerful tool for approximate probabilistic inference on complex, structured models. Typical variational inference methods, however, require to use inference networks with computationally tractable probability density functions. This largely limits the design and implementation of variational inference methods. We consider wild variational inference methods that do not require tractable density functions on the inference networks, and hence can be applied in more challenging cases. As an example of application, we treat stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD) as an inference network, and use our methods to automatically adjust the step sizes of SGLD, yielding significant improvement over the hand-designed step size schemes.


An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms

@machinelearnbot

Note: If you are looking for a review paper, this blog post is also available as an article on arXiv. Added derivations of AdaMax and Nadam. Gradient descent is one of the most popular algorithms to perform optimization and by far the most common way to optimize neural networks. At the same time, every state-of-the-art Deep Learning library contains implementations of various algorithms to optimize gradient descent (e.g. These algorithms, however, are often used as black-box optimizers, as practical explanations of their strengths and weaknesses are hard to come by. This blog post aims at providing you with intuitions towards the behaviour of different algorithms for optimizing gradient descent that will help you put them to use. We are first going to look at the different variants of gradient descent. We will then briefly summarize challenges during training. Subsequently, we will introduce the most common optimization algorithms by showing their motivation to resolve these challenges and how this leads to the derivation of their update rules.


Stochastic Gradient Descent in Continuous Time

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Stochastic gradient descent in continuous time (SGDCT) provides a computationally efficient method for the statistical learning of continuous-time models, which are widely used in science, engineering, and finance. The SGDCT algorithm follows a (noisy) descent direction along a continuous stream of data. SGDCT performs an online parameter update in continuous time, with the parameter updates $\theta_t$ satisfying a stochastic differential equation. We prove that $\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} \nabla \bar g(\theta_t) = 0$ where $\bar g$ is a natural objective function for the estimation of the continuous-time dynamics. The convergence proof leverages ergodicity by using an appropriate Poisson equation to help describe the evolution of the parameters for large times. SGDCT can also be used to solve continuous-time optimization problems, such as American options. For certain continuous-time problems, SGDCT has some promising advantages compared to a traditional stochastic gradient descent algorithm. As an example application, SGDCT is combined with a deep neural network to price high-dimensional American options (up to 100 dimensions).