Gradient Descent
Globally Convergent Policy Search for Output Estimation
We introduce the first direct policy search algorithm which provably converges to the globally optimal dynamic filter for the classical problem of predicting the outputs of a linear dynamical system, given noisy, partial observations. Despite the ubiquity of partial observability in practice, theoretical guarantees for direct policy search algorithms, one of the backbones of modern reinforcement learning, have proven difficult to achieve. This is primarily due to the degeneracies which arise when optimizing over filters that maintain an internal state. In this paper, we provide a new perspective on this challenging problem based on the notion of informativity, which intuitively requires that all components of a filter's internal state are representative of the true state of the underlying dynamical system. We show that informativity overcomes the aforementioned degeneracy. Specifically, we propose a regularizer which explicitly enforces informativity, and establish that gradient descent on this regularized objective - combined with a "reconditioning step" - converges to the globally optimal cost at a O (1 /T) rate.
Supplementary Material For Stochastic Multiple Target Sampling Gradient Descent
This consists of the following sections: Appendix 1 contains the proofs and derivations of our theory development. As a consequence, we obtain the conclusion of Equation (1). By choosing u to be a one hot vector at i, we obtain the conclusion of Lemma 1. 1.3 Derivations for the matrix U's formulation in Equation (3) We have ฯ As a consequence, we obtain the conclusion of Equation (3). 3 1.4 Proof of Theorem 2 Before proving this theorem, let us re-state it: We have for all i = 1,...,K that D In this experiment, the three target distributions are created as presented in the main paper. Results are averaged over 5 runs. We take the best checkpoint in each approach based on the validation score.
Appendix to: Training Uncertainty-Aware Classifiers with Conformalized Deep Learning Bat-Sheva Einbinder Y aniv Romano Matteo Sesia Y anfei Zhou A1 Additional methodological details
Authors listed in alphabetical order. Figure A1: Schematic of the proposed uncertainty-aware deep classification learning algorithm. This procedure is summarized in Algorithm A1, which is a more technical version of Algorithm 1. (t 1) (t 1) This section explains the implementation of the hybrid benchmark method applied in Section 4. This This benchmark is based on a loss function designed to incentivize the trained model to produce the smallest possible conformal prediction sets with the desired coverage (e.g., 90% if (t 1) (t 1) To facilitate the exposition of our analysis, we begin by introducing some helpful notations. The first part of the proof is standard and proceeds as follows. A3.1 Details about experiments with synthetic data The conditional data-generating distribution of Y given X is given by: P[Y | X ] = null Our method (resp., the hybrid method) is applied using The hybrid loss model is trained via stochastic gradient descent for 4000 epochs with learning rate 0.01 decreased by a factor 10 halfway through training.