Achieving real-time and accuracy on embedded platforms has always been the pursuit of road segmentation methods. To this end, they have proposed many lightweight networks. However, they ignore the fact that roads are "stuff" (background or environmental elements) rather than "things" (specific identifiable objects), which inspires us to explore the feasibility of representing roads with low-level instead of high-level features. Surprisingly, we find that the primary stage of mainstream network models is sufficient to represent most pixels of the road for segmentation. Motivated by this, we propose a Low-level Feature Dominated Road Segmentation network (LFD-RoadSeg). Specifically, LFD-RoadSeg employs a bilateral structure. The spatial detail branch is firstly designed to extract low-level feature representation for the road by the first stage of ResNet-18. To suppress texture-less regions mistaken as the road in the low-level feature, the context semantic branch is then designed to extract the context feature in a fast manner. To this end, in the second branch, we asymmetrically downsample the input image and design an aggregation module to achieve comparable receptive fields to the third stage of ResNet-18 but with less time consumption. Finally, to segment the road from the low-level feature, a selective fusion module is proposed to calculate pixel-wise attention between the low-level representation and context feature, and suppress the non-road low-level response by this attention. On KITTI-Road, LFD-RoadSeg achieves a maximum F1-measure (MaxF) of 95.21% and an average precision of 93.71%, while reaching 238 FPS on a single TITAN Xp and 54 FPS on a Jetson TX2, all with a compact model size of just 936k parameters. The source code is available at https://github.com/zhouhuan-hust/LFD-RoadSeg.

Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) is a relatively new technique for imaging biological tissue at subcellular resolution. In recent years, learning-based segmentation methods have enabled precise quantification of cell type and morphology, but typically rely on large datasets with fully annotated ground truth (GT) labels. This paper explores the effects of imperfect labels on learning-based segmentation models and evaluates the generalisability of these models to different tissue types. Our results show that removing 50% of cell annotations from GT masks only reduces the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) score to 0.874 (from 0.889 achieved by a model trained on fully annotated GT masks). This implies that annotation time can in fact be reduced by at least half without detrimentally affecting performance. Furthermore, training our single-tissue model on imperfect labels only decreases DSC by 0.031 on an unseen tissue type compared to its multi-tissue counterpart, with negligible qualitative differences in segmentation. Additionally, bootstrapping the worst-performing model (with 5% of cell annotations) a total of ten times improves its original DSC score of 0.720 to 0.829. These findings imply that less time and work can be put into the process of producing comparable segmentation models; this includes eliminating the need for multiple IMC tissue types during training, whilst also providing the potential for models with very few labels to improve on themselves. Source code is available on GitHub: https://github.com/kimberley/ISBI2024.

This paper presents a novel approach at the intersection of machine learning and number theory, focusing on the classification of prime and non-prime numbers. At the core of our research is the development of a highly sparse encoding method, integrated with conventional neural network architectures. This combination has shown promising results, achieving a recall of over 99\% in identifying prime numbers and 79\% for non-prime numbers from an inherently imbalanced sequential series of integers, while exhibiting rapid model convergence before the completion of a single training epoch. We performed training using $10^6$ integers starting from a specified integer and tested on a different range of $2 \times 10^6$ integers extending from $10^6$ to $3 \times 10^6$, offset by the same starting integer. While constrained by the memory capacity of our resources, which limited our analysis to a span of $3\times10^6$, we believe that our study contribute to the application of machine learning in prime number analysis. This work aims to demonstrate the potential of such applications and hopes to inspire further exploration and possibilities in diverse fields.

Machine learning algorithms are increasingly provided as black-box cloud services or pre-trained models, without access to their training data. This motivates the problem of zero-shot out-of-distribution (OOD) detection. Concretely, we aim to detect OOD objects that do not belong to the classifier's label set but are erroneously classified as in-distribution (ID) objects. Our approach, RONIN, uses an off-the-shelf diffusion model to replace detected objects with inpainting. RONIN conditions the inpainting process with the predicted ID label, drawing the input object closer to the in-distribution domain. As a result, the reconstructed object is very close to the original in the ID cases and far in the OOD cases, allowing RONIN to effectively distinguish ID and OOD samples. Throughout extensive experiments, we demonstrate that RONIN achieves competitive results compared to previous approaches across several datasets, both in zero-shot and non-zero-shot settings.

The advent of generative AI images has completely disrupted the art world. Distinguishing AI generated images from human art is a challenging problem whose impact is growing over time. A failure to address this problem allows bad actors to defraud individuals paying a premium for human art and companies whose stated policies forbid AI imagery. It is also critical for content owners to establish copyright, and for model trainers interested in curating training data in order to avoid potential model collapse. There are several different approaches to distinguishing human art from AI images, including classifiers trained by supervised learning, research tools targeting diffusion models, and identification by professional artists using their knowledge of artistic techniques. In this paper, we seek to understand how well these approaches can perform against today's modern generative models in both benign and adversarial settings. We curate real human art across 7 styles, generate matching images from 5 generative models, and apply 8 detectors (5 automated detectors and 3 different human groups including 180 crowdworkers, 4000+ professional artists, and 13 expert artists experienced at detecting AI). Both Hive and expert artists do very well, but make mistakes in different ways (Hive is weaker against adversarial perturbations while Expert artists produce higher false positives). We believe these weaknesses will remain as models continue to evolve, and use our data to demonstrate why a combined team of human and automated detectors provides the best combination of accuracy and robustness.

Purpose: To develop and evaluate a semi-supervised learning model for intracranial hemorrhage detection and segmentation on an out-of-distribution head CT evaluation set. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used semi-supervised learning to bootstrap performance. An initial "teacher" deep learning model was trained on 457 pixel-labeled head CT scans collected from one US institution from 2010-2017 and used to generate pseudo-labels on a separate unlabeled corpus of 25000 examinations from the RSNA and ASNR. A second "student" model was trained on this combined pixel- and pseudo-labeled dataset. Hyperparameter tuning was performed on a validation set of 93 scans. Testing for both classification (n=481 examinations) and segmentation (n=23 examinations, or 529 images) was performed on CQ500, a dataset of 481 scans performed in India, to evaluate out-of-distribution generalizability. The semi-supervised model was compared with a baseline model trained on only labeled data using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and average precision (AP) metrics. Results: The semi-supervised model achieved statistically significantly higher examination AUC on CQ500 compared with the baseline (0.939 [0.938, 0.940] vs. 0.907 [0.906, 0.908]) (p=0.009). It also achieved a higher DSC (0.829 [0.825, 0.833] vs. 0.809 [0.803, 0.812]) (p=0.012) and Pixel AP (0.848 [0.843, 0.853]) vs. 0.828 [0.817, 0.828]) compared to the baseline. Conclusion: The addition of unlabeled data in a semi-supervised learning framework demonstrates stronger generalizability potential for intracranial hemorrhage detection and segmentation compared with a supervised baseline.

Smartphones have become indispensable in our daily lives and can do almost everything, from communication to online shopping. However, with the increased usage, cybercrime aimed at mobile devices is rocketing. Smishing attacks, in particular, have observed a significant upsurge in recent years. This problem is further exacerbated by the perpetrator creating new deceptive websites daily, with an average life cycle of under 15 hours. This renders the standard practice of keeping a database of malicious URLs ineffective. To this end, we propose a novel on-device pipeline: COPS that intelligently identifies features of fraudulent messages and URLs to alert the user in real-time. COPS is a lightweight pipeline with a detection module based on the Disentangled Variational Autoencoder of size 3.46MB for smishing and URL phishing detection, and we benchmark it on open datasets. We achieve an accuracy of 98.15% and 99.5%, respectively, for both tasks, with a false negative and false positive rate of a mere 0.037 and 0.015, outperforming previous works with the added advantage of ensuring real-time alerts on resource-constrained devices.

Graph representation learning (GRL) is critical for extracting insights from complex network structures, but it also raises security concerns due to potential privacy vulnerabilities in these representations. This paper investigates the structural vulnerabilities in graph neural models where sensitive topological information can be inferred through edge reconstruction attacks. Our research primarily addresses the theoretical underpinnings of cosine-similarity-based edge reconstruction attacks (COSERA), providing theoretical and empirical evidence that such attacks can perfectly reconstruct sparse Erdos Renyi graphs with independent random features as graph size increases. Conversely, we establish that sparsity is a critical factor for COSERA's effectiveness, as demonstrated through analysis and experiments on stochastic block models. Finally, we explore the resilience of (provably) private graph representations produced via noisy aggregation (NAG) mechanism against COSERA. We empirically delineate instances wherein COSERA demonstrates both efficacy and deficiency in its capacity to function as an instrument for elucidating the trade-off between privacy and utility.

Recent studies have highlighted the benefits of generating multiple synthetic datasets for supervised learning, from increased accuracy to more effective model selection and uncertainty estimation. These benefits have clear empirical support, but the theoretical understanding of them is currently very light. We seek to increase the theoretical understanding by deriving bias-variance decompositions for several settings of using multiple synthetic datasets. Our theory predicts multiple synthetic datasets to be especially beneficial for high-variance downstream predictors, and yields a simple rule of thumb to select the appropriate number of synthetic datasets in the case of mean-squared error and Brier score. We investigate how our theory works in practice by evaluating the performance of an ensemble over many synthetic datasets for several real datasets and downstream predictors. The results follow our theory, showing that our insights are also practically relevant.

Deep Learning has revolutionized the field of AI and led to remarkable achievements in applications involving image and text data. Unfortunately, there is inconclusive evidence on the merits of neural networks for structured tabular data. In this paper, we introduce a large-scale empirical study comparing neural networks against gradient-boosted decision trees on tabular data, but also transformer-based architectures against traditional multi-layer perceptrons (MLP) with residual connections. In contrast to prior work, our empirical findings indicate that neural networks are competitive against decision trees. Furthermore, we assess that transformer-based architectures do not outperform simpler variants of traditional MLP architectures on tabular datasets. As a result, this paper helps the research and practitioner communities make informed choices on deploying neural networks on future tabular data applications.