The acceleration in the adoption of AI-based automated decision-making systems poses a challenge for evaluating the fairness of algorithmic decisions, especially in the absence of ground truth. When designing interventions, uplift modeling is used extensively to identify candidates that are likely to benefit from treatment. However, these models remain particularly susceptible to fairness evaluation due to the lack of ground truth on the outcome measure since a candidate cannot be in both treatment and control simultaneously. In this article, we propose a framework that overcomes the missing ground truth problem by generating surrogates to serve as a proxy for counterfactual labels of uplift modeling campaigns. We then leverage the surrogate ground truth to conduct a more comprehensive binary fairness evaluation. We show how to apply the approach in a comprehensive study from a real-world marketing campaign for promotional offers and demonstrate its enhancement for fairness evaluation.

There has been considerable divergence of opinion on the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). While the initial optimism that reasoning might emerge automatically with scale has been tempered thanks to a slew of counterexamples--ranging from multiplication to simple planning--there persists a wide spread belief that LLMs can self-critique and improve their own solutions in an iterative fashion. This belief seemingly rests on the assumption that verification of correctness should be easier than generation--a rather classical argument from computational complexity--which should be irrelevant to LLMs to the extent that what they are doing is approximate retrieval. In this paper, we set out to systematically investigate the effectiveness of iterative prompting in the context of reasoning and planning. We present a principled empirical study of the performance of GPT-4 in three domains: Game of 24, Graph Coloring, and STRIPS planning. We experiment both with the model critiquing its own answers and with an external correct reasoner verifying proposed solutions. In each case, we analyze whether the content of criticisms actually affects bottom line performance, and whether we can ablate elements of the augmented system without losing performance. We observe significant performance collapse with self-critique, significant performance gains with sound external verification, but that the content of critique doesn't matter to the performance of the system. In fact, merely re-prompting with a sound verifier maintains most of the benefits of more involved setups.

We propose and analyze an adaptive adversary that can retrain a Trojaned DNN and is also aware of SOTA output-based Trojaned model detectors. We show that such an adversary can ensure (1) high accuracy on both trigger-embedded and clean samples and (2) bypass detection. Our approach is based on an observation that the high dimensionality of the DNN parameters provides sufficient degrees of freedom to simultaneously achieve these objectives. We also enable SOTA detectors to be adaptive by allowing retraining to recalibrate their parameters, thus modeling a co-evolution of parameters of a Trojaned model and detectors. We then show that this co-evolution can be modeled as an iterative game, and prove that the resulting (optimal) solution of this interactive game leads to the adversary successfully achieving the above objectives. In addition, we provide a greedy algorithm for the adversary to select a minimum number of input samples for embedding triggers. We show that for cross-entropy or log-likelihood loss functions used by the DNNs, the greedy algorithm provides provable guarantees on the needed number of trigger-embedded input samples. Extensive experiments on four diverse datasets -- MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and SpeechCommand -- reveal that the adversary effectively evades four SOTA output-based Trojaned model detectors: MNTD, NeuralCleanse, STRIP, and TABOR.

Embodied agents capable of complex physical skills can improve productivity, elevate life quality, and reshape human-machine collaboration. We aim at autonomous training of embodied agents for various tasks involving mainly large foundation models. It is believed that these models could act as a brain for embodied agents; however, existing methods heavily rely on humans for task proposal and scene customization, limiting the learning autonomy, training efficiency, and generalization of the learned policies. In contrast, we introduce a brain-body synchronization ({\it BBSEA}) scheme to promote embodied learning in unknown environments without human involvement. The proposed combines the wisdom of foundation models (``brain'') with the physical capabilities of embodied agents (``body''). Specifically, it leverages the ``brain'' to propose learnable physical tasks and success metrics, enabling the ``body'' to automatically acquire various skills by continuously interacting with the scene. We carry out an exploration of the proposed autonomous learning scheme in a table-top setting, and we demonstrate that the proposed synchronization can generate diverse tasks and develop multi-task policies with promising adaptability to new tasks and configurations. We will release our data, code, and trained models to facilitate future studies in building autonomously learning agents with large foundation models in more complex scenarios. More visualizations are available at \href{https://bbsea-embodied-ai.github.io}{https://bbsea-embodied-ai.github.io}

Background: Machine learning (ML) methods often fail with data that deviates from their training distribution. This is a significant concern for ML-enabled devices in clinical settings, where data drift may cause unexpected performance that jeopardizes patient safety. Method: We propose a ML-enabled Statistical Process Control (SPC) framework for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and drift monitoring. SPC is advantageous as it visually and statistically highlights deviations from the expected distribution. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework for monitoring data drift in radiological images, we investigated different design choices, including methods for extracting feature representations, drift quantification, and SPC parameter selection. Results: We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework for two tasks: 1) differentiating axial vs. non-axial computed tomography (CT) images and 2) separating chest x-ray (CXR) from other modalities. For both tasks, we achieved high accuracy in detecting OOD inputs, with 0.913 in CT and 0.995 in CXR, and sensitivity of 0.980 in CT and 0.984 in CXR. Our framework was also adept at monitoring data streams and identifying the time a drift occurred. In a simulation with 100 daily CXR cases, we detected a drift in OOD input percentage from 0-1% to 3-5% within two days, maintaining a low false-positive rate. Through additional experimental results, we demonstrate the framework's data-agnostic nature and independence from the underlying model's structure. Conclusion: We propose a framework for OOD detection and drift monitoring that is agnostic to data, modality, and model. The framework is customizable and can be adapted for specific applications.

Generative self-supervised learning on graphs, particularly graph masked autoencoders, has emerged as a popular learning paradigm and demonstrated its efficacy in handling non-Euclidean data. However, several remaining issues limit the capability of existing methods: 1) the disregard of uneven node significance in masking, 2) the underutilization of holistic graph information, 3) the ignorance of semantic knowledge in the representation space due to the exclusive use of reconstruction loss in the output space, and 4) the unstable reconstructions caused by the large volume of masked contents. In light of this, we propose UGMAE, a unified framework for graph masked autoencoders to address these issues from the perspectives of adaptivity, integrity, complementarity, and consistency. Specifically, we first develop an adaptive feature mask generator to account for the unique significance of nodes and sample informative masks (adaptivity). We then design a ranking-based structure reconstruction objective joint with feature reconstruction to capture holistic graph information and emphasize the topological proximity between neighbors (integrity). After that, we present a bootstrapping-based similarity module to encode the high-level semantic knowledge in the representation space, complementary to the low-level reconstruction in the output space (complementarity). Finally, we build a consistency assurance module to provide reconstruction objectives with extra stabilized consistency targets (consistency). Extensive experiments demonstrate that UGMAE outperforms both contrastive and generative state-of-the-art baselines on several tasks across multiple datasets.

Early detection of network intrusions and cyber threats is one of the main pillars of cybersecurity. One of the most effective approaches for this purpose is to analyze network traffic with the help of artificial intelligence algorithms, with the aim of detecting the possible presence of an attacker by distinguishing it from a legitimate user. This is commonly done by collecting the traffic exchanged between terminals in a network and analyzing it on a per-packet or per-connection basis. In this paper, we propose instead to perform pre-processing of network traffic under analysis with the aim of extracting some new metrics on which we can perform more efficient detection and overcome some limitations of classical approaches. These new metrics are based on graph theory, and consider the network as a whole, rather than focusing on individual packets or connections. Our approach is validated through experiments performed on publicly available data sets, from which it results that it can not only overcome some of the limitations of classical approaches, but also achieve a better detection capability of cyber threats.

The ability to generate sentiment-controlled feedback in response to multimodal inputs, comprising both text and images, addresses a critical gap in human-computer interaction by enabling systems to provide empathetic, accurate, and engaging responses. This capability has profound applications in healthcare, marketing, and education. To this end, we construct a large-scale Controllable Multimodal Feedback Synthesis (CMFeed) dataset and propose a controllable feedback synthesis system. The proposed system includes an encoder, decoder, and controllability block for textual and visual inputs. It extracts textual and visual features using a transformer and Faster R-CNN networks and combines them to generate feedback. The CMFeed dataset encompasses images, text, reactions to the post, human comments with relevance scores, and reactions to the comments. The reactions to the post and comments are utilized to train the proposed model to produce feedback with a particular (positive or negative) sentiment. A sentiment classification accuracy of 77.23% has been achieved, 18.82% higher than the accuracy without using the controllability. Moreover, the system incorporates a similarity module for assessing feedback relevance through rank-based metrics. It implements an interpretability technique to analyze the contribution of textual and visual features during the generation of uncontrolled and controlled feedback.

Self-alignment is an effective way to reduce the cost of human annotation while ensuring promising model capability. However, most current methods complete the data collection and training steps in a single round, which may overlook the continuously improving ability of self-aligned models. This gives rise to a key query: What if we do multi-time bootstrapping self-alignment? Does this strategy enhance model performance or lead to rapid degradation? In this paper, our pioneering exploration delves into the impact of bootstrapping self-alignment on large language models. Our findings reveal that bootstrapping self-alignment markedly surpasses the single-round approach, by guaranteeing data diversity from in-context learning. To further exploit the capabilities of bootstrapping, we investigate and adjust the training order of data, which yields improved performance of the model. Drawing on these findings, we propose Step-On-Feet Tuning (SOFT) which leverages model's continuously enhanced few-shot ability to boost zero or one-shot performance. Based on easy-to-hard training recipe, we propose SOFT+ which further boost self-alignment's performance. Our experiments demonstrate the efficiency of SOFT (SOFT+) across various classification and generation tasks, highlighting the potential of bootstrapping self-alignment on continually enhancing model alignment performance.

Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) models have demonstrated remarkable generalization capabilities across multiple challenging distribution shifts. However, there is still much to be explored in terms of their robustness to the variations of specific visual factors. In real-world applications, reliable and safe systems must consider other safety objectives beyond classification accuracy, such as predictive uncertainty. Yet, the effectiveness of CLIP models on such safety-related features is less-explored. Driven by the above, this work comprehensively investigates the safety objectives of CLIP models, specifically focusing on three key properties: resilience to visual factor variations, calibrated uncertainty estimations, and the ability to detect anomalous inputs. To this end, we study 83 CLIP models and 127 ImageNet classifiers. They are diverse in architecture, (pre)training distribution and training strategies. We consider 10 visual factors (e.g., shape and pattern), 5 types of out-of-distribution data, and 8 natural and challenging test conditions with different shift types, such as texture, style, and perturbation shifts. Our study has unveiled several previously unknown insights into CLIP models. For instance, they are not consistently more calibrated than other ImageNet models, which contradicts existing findings. Additionally, our analysis underscores the significance of training source design by showcasing its profound influence on the three safety-related properties. We believe our comprehensive study can shed light on and help guide the development of more robust and reliable CLIP models.