Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Performance Analysis


Trustworthy and Responsible AI for Human-Centric Autonomous Decision-Making Systems

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence (AI) represents the frontier of computer science, enabling machines to emulate human intelligence and perform tasks that were once exclusive to human capabilities (Briganti and Le Moine 2020). This rapid progression in AI, driven by Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) innovations, has catalyzed breakthroughs across various industries, including business, communication, healthcare, and education, among others. Utilizing state-of-the-art computational resources, the AI models are trained on extensive datasets and can be used for decision-making on unseen data. Recent advancements in AI algorithms and feature engineering techniques have played a pivotal role in transforming various human-centric fields, notably, healthcare (Esteva et al 2019), image and text generation (Epstein et al 2023), biometrics and cybersecurity (Gavrilova et al 2022), online social media opinion mining (Anzum and Gavrilova 2023), autonomous driving vehicles (Ma et al 2020), and beyond. Despite the impressive capabilities exhibited by recent AI-based systems, a significant challenge lies in their inherent black box nature. Due to the lack of explainability and interpretability of AI models, establishing trust among end users has become critical (von Eschenbach 2021). Therefore, to ensure trustworthiness in AI-empowered systems, it is imperative not only to improve the model's accuracy but also to incorporate explainability and interpretability into the model's architecture and


Membership Inference Attacks Against In-Context Learning

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to specific tasks introduces concerns about computational efficiency, prompting an exploration of efficient methods such as In-Context Learning (ICL). However, the vulnerability of ICL to privacy attacks under realistic assumptions remains largely unexplored. In this work, we present the first membership inference attack tailored for ICL, relying solely on generated texts without their associated probabilities. We propose four attack strategies tailored to various constrained scenarios and conduct extensive experiments on four popular large language models. Empirical results show that our attacks can accurately determine membership status in most cases, e.g., 95\% accuracy advantage against LLaMA, indicating that the associated risks are much higher than those shown by existing probability-based attacks. Additionally, we propose a hybrid attack that synthesizes the strengths of the aforementioned strategies, achieving an accuracy advantage of over 95\% in most cases. Furthermore, we investigate three potential defenses targeting data, instruction, and output. Results demonstrate combining defenses from orthogonal dimensions significantly reduces privacy leakage and offers enhanced privacy assurances.


Large Language Models for Automatic Detection of Sensitive Topics

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Sensitive information detection is crucial in content moderation to maintain safe online communities. Assisting in this traditionally manual process could relieve human moderators from overwhelming and tedious tasks, allowing them to focus solely on flagged content that may pose potential risks. Rapidly advancing large language models (LLMs) are known for their capability to understand and process natural language and so present a potential solution to support this process. This study explores the capabilities of five LLMs for detecting sensitive messages in the mental well-being domain within two online datasets and assesses their performance in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores, and consistency. Our findings indicate that LLMs have the potential to be integrated into the moderation workflow as a convenient and precise detection tool. The best-performing model, GPT-4o, achieved an average accuracy of 99.5\% and an F1-score of 0.99. We discuss the advantages and potential challenges of using LLMs in the moderation workflow and suggest that future research should address the ethical considerations of utilising this technology.


Large Language Models versus Classical Machine Learning: Performance in COVID-19 Mortality Prediction Using High-Dimensional Tabular Data

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Background: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of classical machine learning models (CMLs) and large language models (LLMs) in predicting mortality associated with COVID-19 by utilizing a high-dimensional tabular dataset. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 9,134 COVID-19 patients collected across four hospitals. Seven CML models, including XGBoost and random forest (RF), were trained and evaluated. The structured data was converted into text for zero-shot classification by eight LLMs, including GPT-4 and Mistral-7b. Additionally, Mistral-7b was fine-tuned using the QLoRA approach to enhance its predictive capabilities. Results: Among the CML models, XGBoost and RF achieved the highest accuracy, with F1 scores of 0.87 for internal validation and 0.83 for external validation. In the LLM category, GPT-4 was the top performer with an F1 score of 0.43. Fine-tuning Mistral-7b significantly improved its recall from 1% to 79%, resulting in an F1 score of 0.74, which was stable during external validation. Conclusion: While LLMs show moderate performance in zero-shot classification, fine-tuning can significantly enhance their effectiveness, potentially aligning them closer to CML models. However, CMLs still outperform LLMs in high-dimensional tabular data tasks.


Exploring Bias and Prediction Metrics to Characterise the Fairness of Machine Learning for Equity-Centered Public Health Decision-Making: A Narrative Review

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Background: The rapid advancement of Machine Learning (ML) represents novel opportunities to enhance public health research, surveillance, and decision-making. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of algorithmic bias, systematic errors in predicted population health outcomes, resulting from the public health application of ML. The objective of this narrative review is to explore the types of bias generated by ML and quantitative metrics to assess these biases. Methods : We performed search on PubMed, MEDLINE, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Digital Library, Science Direct, and Springer Nature. We used keywords to identify studies describing types of bias and metrics to measure these in the domain of ML and public and population health published in English between 2008 and 2023, inclusive. Results: A total of 72 articles met the inclusion criteria. Our review identified the commonly described types of bias and quantitative metrics to assess these biases from an equity perspective. Conclusion : The review will help formalize the evaluation framework for ML on public health from an equity perspective.


Time series classification with random convolution kernels based transforms: pooling operators and input representations matter

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

This article presents a new approach based on MiniRocket, called SelF-Rocket, for fast time series classification (TSC). Unlike existing approaches based on random convolution kernels, it dynamically selects the best couple of input representations and pooling operator during the training process. SelF-Rocket achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on the University of California Riverside (UCR) TSC benchmark datasets.


CMOB: Large-Scale Cancer Multi-Omics Benchmark with Open Datasets, Tasks, and Baselines

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Machine learning has shown great potential in the field of cancer multi-omics studies, offering incredible opportunities for advancing precision medicine. However, the challenges associated with dataset curation and task formulation pose significant hurdles, especially for researchers lacking a biomedical background. Here, we introduce the CMOB, the first large-scale cancer multi-omics benchmark integrates the TCGA platform, making data resources accessible and usable for machine learning researchers without significant preparation and expertise.To date, CMOB includes a collection of 20 cancer multi-omics datasets covering 32 cancers, accompanied by a systematic data processing pipeline. CMOB provides well-processed dataset versions to support 20 meaningful tasks in four studies, with a collection of benchmarks. We also integrate CMOB with two complementary resources and various biological tools to explore broader research avenues.All resources are open-accessible with user-friendly and compatible integration scripts that enable non-experts to easily incorporate this complementary information for various tasks. We conduct extensive experiments on selected datasets to offer recommendations on suitable machine learning baselines for specific applications. Through CMOB, we aim to facilitate algorithmic advances and hasten the development, validation, and clinical translation of machine-learning models for personalized cancer treatments. CMOB is available on GitHub (\url{https://github.com/chenzRG/Cancer-Multi-Omics-Benchmark}).


Real-time Accident Anticipation for Autonomous Driving Through Monocular Depth-Enhanced 3D Modeling

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The primary goal of traffic accident anticipation is to foresee potential accidents in real time using dashcam videos, a task that is pivotal for enhancing the safety and reliability of autonomous driving technologies. In this study, we introduce an innovative framework, AccNet, which significantly advances the prediction capabilities beyond the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) 2D-based methods by incorporating monocular depth cues for sophisticated 3D scene modeling. Addressing the prevalent challenge of skewed data distribution in traffic accident datasets, we propose the Binary Adaptive Loss for Early Anticipation (BA-LEA). This novel loss function, together with a multi-task learning strategy, shifts the focus of the predictive model towards the critical moments preceding an accident. {We rigorously evaluate the performance of our framework on three benchmark datasets--Dashcam Accident Dataset (DAD), Car Crash Dataset (CCD), and AnAn Accident Detection (A3D), and DADA-2000 Dataset--demonstrating its superior predictive accuracy through key metrics such as Average Precision (AP) and mean Time-To-Accident (mTTA).


Improved Diversity-Promoting Collaborative Metric Learning for Recommendation

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Collaborative Metric Learning (CML) has recently emerged as a popular method in recommendation systems (RS), closing the gap between metric learning and collaborative filtering. Following the convention of RS, existing practices exploit unique user representation in their model design. This paper focuses on a challenging scenario where a user has multiple categories of interests. Under this setting, the unique user representation might induce preference bias, especially when the item category distribution is imbalanced. To address this issue, we propose a novel method called \textit{Diversity-Promoting Collaborative Metric Learning} (DPCML), with the hope of considering the commonly ignored minority interest of the user. The key idea behind DPCML is to introduce a set of multiple representations for each user in the system where users' preference toward an item is aggregated by taking the minimum item-user distance among their embedding set. Specifically, we instantiate two effective assignment strategies to explore a proper quantity of vectors for each user. Meanwhile, a \textit{Diversity Control Regularization Scheme} (DCRS) is developed to accommodate the multi-vector representation strategy better. Theoretically, we show that DPCML could induce a smaller generalization error than traditional CML. Furthermore, we notice that CML-based approaches usually require \textit{negative sampling} to reduce the heavy computational burden caused by the pairwise objective therein. In this paper, we reveal the fundamental limitation of the widely adopted hard-aware sampling from the One-Way Partial AUC (OPAUC) perspective and then develop an effective sampling alternative for the CML-based paradigm. Finally, comprehensive experiments over a range of benchmark datasets speak to the efficacy of DPCML. Code are available at \url{https://github.com/statusrank/LibCML}.


NoPhish: Efficient Chrome Extension for Phishing Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The growth of digitalization services via web browsers has simplified our daily routine of doing business. But at the same time, it has made the web browser very attractive for several cyber-attacks. Web phishing is a well-known cyberattack that is used by attackers camouflaging as trustworthy web servers to obtain sensitive user information such as credit card numbers, bank information, personal ID, social security number, and username and passwords. In recent years many techniques have been developed to identify the authentic web pages that users visit and warn them when the webpage is phishing. In this paper, we have developed an extension for Chrome the most favorite web browser, that will serve as a middleware between the user and phishing websites. The Chrome extension named "NoPhish" shall identify a phishing webpage based on several Machine Learning techniques. We have used the training dataset from "PhishTank" and extracted the 22 most popular features as rated by the Alexa database. The training algorithms used are Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and k-Nearest Neighbor. The performance results show that Random Forest delivers the best precision.