Fairness metrics are a core tool in the fair machine learning literature (FairML), used to determine that ML models are, in some sense, "fair."

We introduce a new task called Adaptable Error Detection (AED), which aims to identify behavior errors in few-shot imitation (FSI) policies based on visual observations in novel environments. The potential to cause serious damage to surrounding areas limits the application of FSI policies in real-world scenarios.

Data-driven decision making relies on estimating the effect of interventions, i.e. causal effect estimation . For example, a doctor must decide which medicine she will give her patient, ideally the one with the greatest effect on positive outcomes.

In previous work, for example, Fréchet bounds were studied in the financial context ( e.g., see

To exploit the PDAGs for achieving interventional fairness, previous methods have been built on variable selection or causal effect identification, but limited to reduced prediction accuracy or strong assumptions. In this paper, we propose a general min-max optimization framework that can achieve interventional fairness with promising prediction accuracy and can be extended to maximally oriented PDAGs (MPDAGs) with added background knowledge.

Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) aim to infer whether a target data record has been utilized for model training or not.

Differential privacy (DP) is a widely used approach for mitigating privacy risks when training machine learning models on sensitive data. DP mechanisms add noise during training to limit the risk of information leakage. The scale of the added noise is critical, as it determines the trade-off between privacy and utility.

Multi-person pose estimation and tracking have been actively researched by the computer vision community due to their practical applicability. However, existing human pose estimation and tracking datasets have only been successful in typical scenarios, such as those without motion blur or with well-lit conditions.