Learning exists in the context of data, yet notions of confidence typically focus on model predictions, not label quality. Confident learning (CL) is an alternative approach which focuses instead on label quality by characterizing and identifying label errors in datasets, based on the principles of pruning noisy data, counting with probabilistic thresholds to estimate noise, and ranking examples to train with confidence. Whereas numerous studies have developed these principles independently, here, we combine them, building on the assumption of a class-conditional noise process to directly estimate the joint distribution between noisy (given) labels and uncorrupted (unknown) labels. This results in a generalized CL which is provably consistent and experimentally performant. We present sufficient conditions where CL exactly finds label errors, and show CL performance exceeding seven recent competitive approaches for learning with noisy labels on the CIFAR dataset. Uniquely, the CL framework is not coupled to a specific data modality or model (e.g., we use CL to find several label errors in the presumed error-free MNIST dataset and improve sentiment classification on text data in Amazon Reviews). We also employ CL on ImageNet to quantify ontological class overlap (e.g., estimating 645 missile images are mislabeled as their parent class projectile), and moderately increase model accuracy (e.g., for ResNet) by cleaning data prior to training. These results are replicable using the open-source cleanlab release.

Mental fatigue increases the risk of operator error in language comprehension tasks. In order to prevent operator performance degradation, we used EEG signals to assess the mental fatigue of operators in human-computer systems. This study presents an experimental design for fatigue detection in language comprehension tasks. We obtained EEG signals from a 14-channel wireless EEG detector in 15 healthy participants. Each participant was given a cognitive test of a language comprehension task, in the form of multiple choice questions, in which pronoun references were selected between nominal and surrogate sentences. In this paper, the 2400 EEG fragments collected are divided into three data sets according to different utilization rates, namely 1200s data set with 50% utilization rate, 1500s data set with 62.5% utilization rate, and 1800s data set with 75% utilization rate. In the aspect of feature extraction, different EEG features were extracted, including time domain features, frequency domain features and entropy features, and the effects of different features and feature combinations on classification accuracy were explored. In terms of classification, we introduced the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method as the preferred method, It was compared with Least Squares Support Vector Machines(LSSVM),Support Vector Machines(SVM),Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest(RF), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Decision Tree(DT).According to the results, the classification accuracy of convolutional neural network (CNN) is higher than that of other classification methods. The classification results show that the classification accuracy of 1200S dataset is higher than the other two datasets. The combination of Frequency and entropy feature and CNN has the highest classification accuracy, which is 85.34%.

When deploying a predictive model, it is important to understand its prediction accuracy on future test points, so both good point estimates and accurate confidence intervals for prediction error are essential. Cross-validation (CV) is a widely-used approach for these two tasks, but in spite of its seeming simplicity, its operating properties remain opaque. Considering first estimation, it turns out be challenging to precisely state the estimand corresponding to the cross-validation point estimate. In this work, we show that the the estimand of CV is not the accuracy of the model fit on the data at hand, but is instead the average accuracy over many hypothetical data sets. Specifically, we show that the CV estimate of error has larger mean squared error (MSE) when estimating the prediction error of the final model than when estimating the average prediction error of models across many unseen data sets for the special case of linear regression. Turning to confidence intervals for prediction error, we show that naïve intervals based on CV can fail badly, giving coverage far below the nominal level; we provide a simple example soon in Section 1.1. The source of this behavior is the estimation of the variance used to compute the width of the interval: it does not account for the correlation between the error estimates in different folds, which arises because each data point is used for both training and testing. As a result, the estimate of variance is too small and the intervals are too narrow. To address this issue, we develop a modification of cross-validation, nested cross-validation (NCV), that achieves coverage near the nominal level, even in challenging cases where the usual cross-validation intervals have miscoverage rates two to three times larger than the nominal rate.

The potential presented by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for healthcare has long been recognised by the technical community. More recently, this potential has been recognised by policymakers, resulting in considerable public and private investment in the development of AI for healthcare across the globe. Despite this, excepting limited success stories, real-world implementation of AI systems into front-line healthcare has been limited. There are numerous reasons for this, but a main contributory factor is the lack of internationally accepted, or formalised, regulatory standards to assess AI safety and impact and effectiveness. This is a well-recognised problem with numerous ongoing research and policy projects to overcome it. Our intention here is to contribute to this problem-solving effort by seeking to set out a minimally viable framework for evaluating the safety, acceptability and efficacy of AI systems for healthcare. We do this by conducting a systematic search across Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar to identify all the relevant literature published between January 1970 and November 2020 related to the evaluation of: output performance; efficacy; and real-world use of AI systems, and synthesising the key themes according to the stages of evaluation: pre-clinical (theoretical phase); exploratory phase; definitive phase; and post-market surveillance phase (monitoring). The result is a framework to guide AI system developers, policymakers, and regulators through a sufficient evaluation of an AI system designed for use in healthcare.

Counterfactual statements describe events that did not or cannot take place. We consider the problem of counterfactual detection (CFD) in product reviews. For this purpose, we annotate a multilingual CFD dataset from Amazon product reviews covering counterfactual statements written in English, German, and Japanese languages. The dataset is unique as it contains counterfactuals in multiple languages, covers a new application area of e-commerce reviews, and provides high quality professional annotations. We train CFD models using different text representation methods and classifiers. We find that these models are robust against the selectional biases introduced due to cue phrase-based sentence selection. Moreover, our CFD dataset is compatible with prior datasets and can be merged to learn accurate CFD models. Applying machine translation on English counterfactual examples to create multilingual data performs poorly, demonstrating the language-specificity of this problem, which has been ignored so far.

In this paper, we present a new large-scale dataset for hairstyle recommendation, CelebHair, based on the celebrity facial attributes dataset, CelebA. Our dataset inherited the majority of facial images along with some beauty-related facial attributes from CelebA. Additionally, we employed facial landmark detection techniques to extract extra features such as nose length and pupillary distance, and deep convolutional neural networks for face shape and hairstyle classification. Empirical comparison has demonstrated the superiority of our dataset to other existing hairstyle-related datasets regarding variety, veracity, and volume. Analysis and experiments have been conducted on the dataset in order to evaluate its robustness and usability.

The key challenge of image manipulation detection is how to learn generalizable features that are sensitive to manipulations in novel data, whilst specific to prevent false alarms on authentic images. Current research emphasizes the sensitivity, with the specificity overlooked. In this paper we address both aspects by multi-view feature learning and multi-scale supervision. By exploiting noise distribution and boundary artifact surrounding tampered regions, the former aims to learn semantic-agnostic and thus more generalizable features. The latter allows us to learn from authentic images which are nontrivial to taken into account by current semantic segmentation network based methods. Our thoughts are realized by a new network which we term MVSS-Net. Extensive experiments on five benchmark sets justify the viability of MVSS-Net for both pixel-level and image-level manipulation detection.

Emerging neuroscience technologies such as electrophysiology and calcium imaging can record from tens-of-thousands of neurons in the live animal brain while the animal is responding to stimuli and behaving freely. Scientists often seek to understand how neurons are communicating during certain stimuli or activities, something termed functional neural connectivity. To learn functional connections from large-scale neuroscience data, many have proposed using probabilistic graphical models (Yatsenko et al. 2015; Narayan et al. 2015; Chang et al. 2019), where each edge denotes conditional dependencies between nodes. Yet, applying such models in neuroscience poses a major challenge as only a small subset of neurons in the animal brain can be recorded at once, leading to abundant latent variables. Chandrasekaran et al. (2012) termed this the latent variable graphical model problem and proposed a convex program to solve this. While conceptually attractive, this approach poses several statistical, computational and practical challenges, discussed subsequently, for the task of learning functional neural connectivity from large-scale neuroscience data. Because of this, we are motivated to consider an incredibly simple solution to the latent variable graphical model problem: apply a hard thresholding operator to existing graph selection estimators. In this paper, we study this approach showing that thresholding has more desirable theoretical properties as well as superior empirical performance.

A common shortfall of supervised learning for medical imaging is the greedy need for human annotations, which is often expensive and time-consuming to obtain. This paper proposes a semi-supervised classification method for three kinds of apicomplexan parasites and non-infected host cells microscopic images, which uses a small number of labeled data and a large number of unlabeled data for training. There are two challenges in microscopic image recognition. The first is that salient structures of the microscopic images are more fuzzy and intricate than natural images' on a real-world scale. The second is that insignificant textures, like background staining, lightness, and contrast level, vary a lot in samples from different clinical scenarios. To address these challenges, we aim to learn a distinguishable and appearance-invariant representation by contrastive learning strategy. On one hand, macroscopic images, which share similar shape characteristics in morphology, are introduced to contrast for structure enhancement. On the other hand, different appearance transformations, including color distortion and flittering, are utilized to contrast for texture elimination. In the case where only 1% of microscopic images are labeled, the proposed method reaches an accuracy of 94.90% in a generalized testing set.

Complex data pipelines are increasingly common in diverse applications such as BI reporting and ML modeling. These pipelines often recur regularly (e.g., daily or weekly), as BI reports need to be refreshed, and ML models need to be retrained. However, it is widely reported that in complex production pipelines, upstream data feeds can change in unexpected ways, causing downstream applications to break silently that are expensive to resolve. Data validation has thus become an important topic, as evidenced by notable recent efforts from Google and Amazon, where the objective is to catch data quality issues early as they arise in the pipelines. Our experience on production data suggests, however, that on string-valued data, these existing approaches yield high false-positive rates and frequently require human intervention. In this work, we develop a corpus-driven approach to auto-validate \emph{machine-generated data} by inferring suitable data-validation "patterns" that accurately describe the underlying data domain, which minimizes false positives while maximizing data quality issues caught. Evaluations using production data from real data lakes suggest that Auto-Validate is substantially more effective than existing methods. Part of this technology ships as an Auto-Tag feature in Microsoft Azure Purview.