Digg is back again and has taken on yet another form: A website that aggregates news about artificial intelligence. Digg's job is to find that signal and bring it to you. AI is just the beginning, he said, calling it the noisiest, fastest-moving space on the internet. He promised that more verticals are coming, but he didn't say when Digg will start aggregating news about other topics. At the moment, the website follows 1,000 people directly involved in AI research, investing and media, built from X's social graph.

OpenAI has just launched Daybreak, a cybersecurity initiative that's clearly the company's competitor to Anthropic's Project Glasswing . If you'll recall, Glasswing uses Anthropic's unreleased AI model, Claude Mythos Preview, to provide its clients' cyber defense needs. It's been promising, so far: Mozilla revealed in April that Mythos helped it find and patch 271 vulnerabilities in the latest release of the Firefox browser. OpenAI says Daybreak uses its various AI models, including its specialized security agent Codex. In its announcement, the company explained that Daybreak is built around the premise that cyber defense should be built into software from the start and not just revolve around finding and fixing vulnerabilities.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has enabled complex reasoning abilities in large language models (LLMs). However, most RL algorithms suffer from performance saturation, preventing continued gains as RL training scales. This problem can be characterized by the collapse of entropy, a key diagnostic for exploration in RL. Existing attempts focus on preventing entropy collapse through regularization or clipping. However, their resulting entropy curves often exhibit instability in the long term, which hinders performance gains. In this paper, we introduce Entrocraft, a simple rejection-sampling approach that realizes user-customized entropy schedule by biasing the advantage distributions. Entrocraft requires no objective regularization and is advantage-estimator-agnostic. Theoretically, we relate per-step entropy change to the advantage distribution under minimal assumptions. This explains the behavior of existing RL and entropy-preserving methods. Entrocraft also enables a systematic study of entropy schedules, which reveals that linear annealing, which starts high and decays to a slightly lower target, performs best. Empirically, Entrocraft addresses performance saturation, significantly improving generalization, output diversity, and long-term training. It enables a 4B model to outperform an 8B baseline, sustains improvement for up to 4x longer before plateauing, and raises pass@K by 50% over the baseline.

Calibration measures whether a model's predicted confidence aligns with its empirical accuracy, and is central to the reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs) in high-stakes domains such as medicine and law. While much recent work focuses on improving LLM calibration, the equally important question of how to evaluate it in realistic settings remains underdeveloped. Open-ended question answering (QA), the most common deployment setting for modern LLMs, is where existing evaluation methods fall short: logit-based metrics need restricted output formats and internal probabilities; verbalized confidence is self-reported and often overconfident; and sampling-based methods rely on task-specific extraction rules without a clear finite-sample target. We introduce Sem-ECE (Semantic-Sampling Expected Calibration Error), a calibration evaluation framework for open-ended QA that samples answers from the model, groups them into semantic classes, and uses the resulting frequencies as confidence. We study two estimators within this framework: Sem$_1$-ECE, the same-sample self-consistency score, and Sem$_2$-ECE, a held-out variant that separates answer selection from confidence evaluation. We prove both are asymptotically unbiased, and further show that they agree on easy questions but diverge on hard ones with Sem$_2$ achieving strictly smaller calibration error, so their gap also serves as a diagnostic for question difficulty. Experiments on three open-ended QA benchmarks across five leading commercial LLMs match our theoretical predictions and show that Sem-ECE outperforms verbalized confidence and existing sampling-based methods, while complementing logit-based evaluation when internal probabilities are unavailable.

Unlike a standard PINN--which produces an approximate Deep neural networks (DNNs) or multi-layer perceptronssolution by minimizing a PDE-residual loss and thus yields (MLPs) offer various inherent advantages over traditionalonly a point estimate, failing to quantify uncertainty inapproaches of scientific computing and data analysis, suchduced by noisy or limited data, a Bayesian PINN returns a as finite element methods, wavelets and kernel methods, full posterior distribution over solutions by combining the which are often hampered by the irregular and nonlinearuncertain information from the likelihood (data) and the data structures and the high input dimensions. In contrast, DNNs are capable of approximating a rich class of functions prior. Bayesian neural networks, originating in the seminal works of MacKay (MacKay, 1995) and Neal (Neal, 1995), with aforementioned complexities and can also easily en-have been extensively studied over the past three decades codes additional complex physical structures, such as sym- (Lampinen & Vehtari, 2001; Titterington, 2004; Graves, metry and other invariant structures.

This paper investigates the learning theory of Transformer networks for regression tasks on the compact Euclidean domain $[0,1]^d$ and $d$-dimensional compact Riemannian manifolds. We propose a novel constructive approximation framework for Transformers that builds local approximations of the target function and aggregates them into a global approximation via softmax partition of unity. This approach leverages the attention mechanism to achieve spatial localization through affine transformations of the input. The softmax activation plays a crucial role in aggregating local approximations to a global output. From an approximation perspective, we prove that a dense Transformer equipped with only two encoder blocks and standard single-hidden-layer point-wise feed-forward networks can achieve a uniform $\varepsilon$-approximation error for $α$-Hölder continuous functions with $α\in (0,1]$ using $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-d/α})$ total parameters. Building upon this approximation guarantee, we establish a near minimax-optimal generalization error bound of order $\mathcal{O}\big(n^{-\frac{2α}{2α+d}} \log n\big)$ for the empirical risk minimizer, where $n$ is the training data size. The Transformer architecture studied in this paper is dense, shallow and wide, and employs softmax activation and sinusoidal positional encodings, closely reflecting practical implementations.

We design Local LMO - a new projection-free gradient-type method for constrained optimization. The key algorithmic idea is to replace the global linear minimization oracle over the constraint set used by Frank-Wolfe (FW) with a local linear minimization oracle over the intersection of the constraint set and a "small" ball centered at the current iterate. In particular, when minimizing $f:\mathbb{R}^d\to \mathbb{R}$ over a constraint $\emptyset\neq\mathcal{X}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d$, Local LMO performs the iteration \[x_{k+1}\in \arg\min_{z\in\mathcal{X}\cap\mathcal{B}(x_{k},t_k)}\langle\nabla f(x_{k}), z \rangle,\] where $x_0\in\mathcal{X}$, and $t_k>0$ is a suitably chosen radius which can be interpreted as an effective stepsize. While designed as an alternative to FW, Local LMO is perhaps best viewed as a generalization of Gradient Descent (GD) rather than a modification of FW. Indeed, it is easy to see that Local LMO reduces to GD in the unconstrained setting and, more generally, to GD restricted to an affine subspace if the constraint $\mathcal{X}$ is affine. We prove that this simple algorithmic scheme transfers the known (unaccelerated) convergence rates of Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) to the projection-free world in several important regimes, some of which are beyond the reach of FW. In contrast to FW theory, i) our guarantees hold without requiring the feasible set $\mathcal{X}$ to be bounded, ii) our theory does not require the "curvature" assumption, which allows us to establish a standard sublinear rate for convex functions with bounded gradients, iii) we obtain a linear rate in the smooth strongly convex regime. Furthermore, we obtain sharp sublinear rates in the smooth convex and non-convex regimes, in the $(L_0,L_1)$-smooth convex regime, and in stochastic and non-differentiable settings.

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as a powerful algorithm for improving the reasoning capabilities of language models, but often fails to improve small models due to sparse rewards on difficult tasks. Existing works mitigate this issue by leveraging a larger model, either to provide hints for rollouts or to provide dense reward signals through knowledge distillation (KD). However, this assumes the existence of such an oracle, and training one can significantly increase total training time. In this work, we propose CoDistill-GRPO, a co-distillation algorithm that simultaneously trains a large and a small model by maximizing carefully designed GRPO objectives. The two models learn from each other: the small model uses an on-policy KD reward to learn from the large model's distribution, while the large model is updated using rollouts generated by the small model with importance reweighting, reducing the computational overhead of rollout generation. We show that CoDistill-GRPO substantially improves small model performance over standard GRPO on mathematical benchmarks across both Qwen and Llama models. Specifically, with Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B, we observe an accuracy increase of over 11.6 percentage points over the base model and an additional 6.0 percentage points over GRPO on the Minerva dataset. Interestingly, the larger model (Qwen2.5-Math-7B) trained with CoDistill-GRPO nearly matches standard GRPO performance despite training on small-model rollouts. This highlights CoDistill-GRPO as a cost-effective alternative to GRPO for larger models, yielding an approximate 18% speedup, which may be of independent interest.

Muon and its variants have shown strong empirical performance in a variety of deep learning tasks. Existing convergence analyses of Muon rely on smoothness assumptions, though arguably the most successful function class for developing deep learning methods (such as AdaGrad, Shampoo, Schedule-Free and more) has been the class of convex and Lipschitz functions. In this paper we question whether the classical convex Lipschitz model is a useful one for understanding Muon. Our answer is no. We show that Muon does not converge on the class of convex and Lipschitz functions, regardless of the choice of learning rate schedule. We also show that error feedback restores convergence of Muon and all the non-Euclidean subgradient methods with momentum. However, this theoretical fix using error feedback degrades the performance of Muon in two representative settings for image classification (CIFAR-10) and language modeling (nanoGPT on FineWeb-Edu 10B). Our conclusion is that convex Lipschitz theory, despite having a prominent role in the design of practical methods for deep learning, is not the most suited one for Muon. This suggests that Muon's success must come from structure absent from this model, most plausibly related to smoothness.

Although the Laplace approximation offers a simple route to uncertainty quantification in deep neural networks, its reliance on inverting large Hessian matrices has motivated a range of computationally feasible low-dimensional or sparse approximations. A prominent class of such methods - sub-network Laplace approximations, constructs surrogates by restricting attention to a small subset of parameters. Existing approaches in this family typically rely on diagonal, layer-wise, or other architectural heuristics for subset selection, which ignore cross-parameter interactions and lack formal optimality guarantees. In this paper, we provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of the sub-network Laplace paradigm. We prove that all sub-network Laplace methods systematically underestimate the predictive variance of the full Laplace posterior, and that this bias decreases monotonically as the retained sub-matrix expands. Leveraging this insight, we propose two principled, analytically grounded sub-network Hessian approximations: \textit{Gradient-Laplace} selects parameters with the largest average squared gradients of the model output with respect to the parameters over a reference dataset; while \textit{Greedy-Laplace} iteratively refines this selection by accounting for off-diagonal interactions in the precision matrix. We establish theoretical guarantees characterizing their optimality properties and show that Gradient-Laplace provably outperforms existing heuristic approaches. Extensive numerical studies across diverse settings indicate that these methods perform strongly relative to existing benchmarks.