Accurate polyp sizing during endoscopy is crucial for cancer risk assessment but is hindered by subjective methods and inadequate datasets lacking integrated 2D appearance, 3D structure, and real-world size information. We introduce PolypSense3D, the first multi-source benchmark dataset specifically targeting depth-aware polyp size measurement. It uniquely integrates over 43,000 frames from virtual simulations, physical phantoms, and clinical sequences, providing synchronized RGB, dense/sparse depth, segmentation masks, camera parameters, and millimeter-scale size labels derived via a novel forceps-assisted in-vivo annotation technique. To establish its value, we benchmark state-of-the-art segmentation and depth estimation models. Results quantify significant domain gaps between simulated/phantom and clinical data and reveal substantial error propagation from perception stages to final size estimation, with the best fully automated pipelines achieving an average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.95 mm on the clinical data subset. Publicly released under CCBY-SA 4.0 with code and evaluation protocols, PolypSense3D offers a standardized platform to accelerate research in robust, clinically relevant quantitative endoscopic vision.

Survey papers are foundational to the scholarly progress of research communities, offering structured overviews that guide both novices and experts across disciplines. However, the recent surge of AI-generated surveys, especially enabled by large language models (LLMs), has transformed this traditionally labor-intensive genre into a low-effort, high-volume output. While such automation lowers entry barriers, it also introduces a critical threat: the phenomenon we term the "survey paper DDoS attack" to the research community. This refers to the unchecked proliferation of superficially comprehensive but often redundant, low-quality, or even hallucinated survey manuscripts, which floods preprint platforms, overwhelms researchers, and erodes trust in the scientific record. In this position paper, we argue that we must stop uploading massive amounts of AI-generated survey papers (i.e., survey paper DDoS attack) to the research community, by instituting strong norms for AI-assisted review writing. We call for restoring expert oversight and transparency in AI usage and, moreover, developing new infrastructures such as Dynamic Live Surveys, community-maintained, version-controlled repositories that blend automated updates with human curation. Through quantitative trend analysis, quality audits, and cultural impact discussion, we show that safeguarding the integrity of surveys is no longer optional but imperative to the research community.

The Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) is one of the simplest generative neural networks capable of learning input distributions. Despite its simplicity, the analysis of its performance in learning from the training data is only well understood in cases that essentially reduce to singular value decomposition of the data. Here, we consider the limit of a large dimension of the input space and a constant number of hidden units. In this limit, we simplify the standard RBM training objective into a form that is equivalent to the multi-index model with non-separable regularization. This opens a path to analyze training of the RBM using methods that are established for multi-index models, such as Approximate Message Passing (AMP) and its state evolution, and the analysis of Gradient Descent (GD) via the dynamical mean-field theory. We then give rigorous asymptotics of the training dynamics of RBMs on data generated by the spiked covariance model as a prototype of a structure suitable for unsupervised learning. We show in particular that RBMs reach the optimal computational weak recovery threshold, aligning with the Baik-Ben Arous-Péché (BBP) transition, in the spiked covariance model.

Neural Probabilistic Circuits (NPCs), a new class of concept bottleneck models, comprise an attribute recognition model and a probabilistic circuit for reasoning. By integrating the outputs from these two modules, NPCs produce compositional and interpretable predictions. While offering enhanced interpretability and high performance on downstream tasks, the neural-network-based attribute recognition model remains a black box. This vulnerability allows adversarial attacks to manipulate attribute predictions by introducing carefully crafted, subtle perturbations to input images, potentially compromising the final predictions. In this paper, we theoretically analyze the adversarial robustness of NPC and demonstrate that it only depends on the robustness of the attribute recognition model and is independent of the robustness of the probabilistic circuit. Moreover, we propose RNPC, the first robust neural probabilistic circuit against adversarial attacks on the recognition module.

The substantial memory demands of pre-training and fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) require memory-efficient optimization algorithms. One promising approach is layer-wise optimization, which treats each transformer block as a single layer and optimizes it sequentially, while freezing the other layers to save optimizer states and activations. Although effective, these methods ignore the varying importance of the modules within each layer, leading to suboptimal performance. Moreover, layer-wise sampling provides only limited memory savings, as at least one full layer must remain active during optimization. To overcome these limitations, we propose Module-wise Importance SAmpling (MISA), a novel method that divides each layer into smaller modules and assigns importance scores to each module. MISA uses a weighted random sampling mechanism to activate modules, provably reducing gradient variance compared to layer-wise sampling. Additionally, we establish an O(1/ K)convergence rate under non-convex and stochastic conditions, where K is the total number of block updates, and provide a detailed memory analysis showcasing MISA's superiority over existing baseline methods.

Plus: The Pentagon says it used Grok in strikes on Iran. For decades, physicists have hunted for weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), a leading candidate for dark matter. But their search has run into a new problem: neutrinos. These tiny particles from the sun and other stars can create a "neutrino fog" that drowns out any signal of dark matter. Hitting the neutrino fog does not, however, mean an end to the search. Researchers just have to shift the focus of their hunt.

Image classifiers are information-discarding machines, by design. Yet, how these models discard information remains mysterious. We hypothesize that one way for image classifiers to reach high accuracy is to zoom to the most discriminative region in the image and then extract features from there to predict image labels, discarding the rest of the image. Studying six popular networks ranging from AlexNet to CLIP, we find that proper framing of the input image can lead to the correct classification of 98.91% of ImageNet images. Furthermore, we uncover positional biases in various datasets, especially a strong center bias in two popular datasets: ImageNet-A and ObjectNet. Finally, leveraging our insights into the potential of zooming, we propose a test-time augmentation (TTA) technique that improves classification accuracy by forcing models to explicitly perform zoom-in operations before making predictions. Our method is more interpretable, accurate, and faster than MEMO, a state-of-the-art (SOTA) TTA method. We introduce ImageNet-Hard, a new benchmark that challenges SOTA classifiers including large vision-language models even when optimal zooming is allowed.

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a dominant AI paradigm due to their exceptional text understanding and generation capabilities. However, their tendency to generate inconsistent or erroneous outputs challenges their reliability, especially in high-stakes domains requiring accuracy and trustworthiness. Existing research primarily focuses on detecting and mitigating model misbehavior in general-purpose scenarios, often overlooking the potential of integrating domain-specific knowledge. In this work, we advance misbehavior detection by incorporating domain knowledge. The core idea is to design a general specification language that enables domain experts to customize domain-specific constraints in a lightweight and intuitive manner, supporting later runtime monitoring of LLM outputs.

Event cameras offer unique advantages in scenarios involving high speed, low light, and high dynamic range, yet their asynchronous and sparse nature poses significant challenges to efficient spatiotemporal representation learning. Specifically, despite notable progress in the field, effectively modeling the full spatiotemporal context, selectively attending to salient dynamic regions, and robustly adapting to the variable density and dynamic nature of event data remain key challenges. Motivated by these challenges, this paper proposes EventMG, a lightweight, efficient, multilevel Mamba-Graph architecture designed for learning high-quality spatiotemporal event representations. EventMG employs a multilevel approach, jointly modeling information at the micro (single event) and macro (event cluster) levels to comprehensively capture the multi-scale characteristics of event data. At the micro-level, it focuses on spatiotemporal details, employing State Space Model (SSM) based Mamba, to precisely capture long-range dependencies among numerous event nodes. Concurrently, at the macro-level, Component Graphs are introduced to efficiently encode the local semantics and global topology of dense event regions. Furthermore, to better accommodate the dynamic and sparse characteristics of data, we propose the Spatiotemporal-aware Event Scanning Technology (SEST), integrating the Adaptive Perturbation Network (APN) and Multidirectional Scanning Module (MSM), which substantially enhances the model's ability to perceive and focus on key spatiotemporal patterns. By employing this novel collaborative paradigm, EventMG demonstrates the ability to effectively capture multi-level spatiotemporal characteristics of event data while maintaining a low parameter count and linear computational complexity, suggesting a promising direction for event representation learning.

Recent language models exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, yet the influence of long-context capacity on reasoning remains underexplored. In this work, we hypothesize that current limitations in reasoning stem, in part, from insufficient long-context capacity, motivated by empirical observations such as i) higher context window length often leads to stronger reasoning performance, and ii) failed reasoning cases resemble failed long-context cases. To test this hypothesis, we examine whether enhancing a model's long-context ability before Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) leads to improved reasoning performance. Specifically, we compared models with identical architectures and fine-tuning data but varying levels of long-context capacity. Our results reveal a consistent trend: models with stronger long-context capacity achieve significantly higher accuracy on reasoning benchmarks after SFT. Notably, these gains persist even on tasks with short input lengths, indicating that long-context training offers generalizable benefits for reasoning performance. These findings suggest that long-context modeling is not just essential for processing lengthy inputs, but also serves as a critical foundation for reasoning. We advocate for treating long-context capacity as a first-class objective in the design of future language models.