Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Generative AI


Epidemic Modeling with Generative Agents

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

This study offers a new paradigm of individual-level modeling to address the grand challenge of incorporating human behavior in epidemic models. Using generative artificial intelligence in an agent-based epidemic model, each agent is empowered to make its own reasonings and decisions via connecting to a large language model such as ChatGPT. Through various simulation experiments, we present compelling evidence that generative agents mimic real-world behaviors such as quarantining when sick and self-isolation when cases rise. Collectively, the agents demonstrate patterns akin to multiple waves observed in recent pandemics followed by an endemic period. Moreover, the agents successfully flatten the epidemic curve. This study creates potential to improve dynamic system modeling by offering a way to represent human brain, reasoning, and decision making. One-Sentence Summary: A new modeling technique using generative AI applied to an epidemic to incorporate human reasoning and decision making.


A Semi-Automated Solution Approach Selection Tool for Any Use Case via Scopus and OpenAI: a Case Study for AI/ML in Oncology

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

In today's vast literature landscape, a manual review is very time-consuming. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a semi-automated tool for solution method review and selection. It caters to researchers, practitioners, and decision-makers while serving as a benchmark for future work. The tool comprises three modules: (1) paper selection and scoring, using a keyword selection scheme to query Scopus API and compute relevancy; (2) solution method extraction in papers utilizing OpenAI API; (3) sensitivity analysis and post-analyzes. It reveals trends, relevant papers, and methods. AI in the oncology case study and several use cases are presented with promising results, comparing the tool to manual ground truth.


Exploring Antitrust and Platform Power in Generative AI

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The concentration of power in a few digital technology companies has become a subject of increasing interest in both academic and non-academic discussions. One of the most noteworthy contributions to the debate is Lina Khan's Amazon's Antitrust Paradox. In this work, Khan contends that Amazon has systematically exerted its dominance in online retail to eliminate competitors and subsequently charge above-market prices. This work contributed to Khan's appointment as the chair of the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), one of the most influential antitrust organisations. Today, several ongoing antitrust lawsuits in the US and Europe involve major technology companies like Apple, Google/Alphabet, and Facebook/Meta. In the realm of generative AI, we are once again witnessing the same companies taking the lead in technological advancements, leaving little room for others to compete. This article examines the market dominance of these corporations in the technology stack behind generative AI from an antitrust law perspective.


ChatGPT saw its first-ever user decline in June

Engadget

After a meteoric rise in popularity late last year and into early 2023, it looks like OpenAI's chatbot is beginning to lose some steam. According to data internet analytics firm Similarweb shared with The Washington Post, last month mobile and desktop traffic to ChatGPT's website fell by 9.7 percent globally. If Similarweb's data is accurate, the drop marks the first time the chatbot has seen a user decline. In June, app tracker Sensor Tower also saw downloads of ChatGPT's iOS client fall off after peaking earlier in the month. OpenAI did not immediately respond to Engadget's comment request.


On the Challenges of Deploying Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data in the Enterprise

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Generative AI technologies are gaining unprecedented popularity, causing a mix of excitement and apprehension through their remarkable capabilities. In this paper, we study the challenges associated with deploying synthetic data, a subfield of Generative AI. Our focus centers on enterprise deployment, with an emphasis on privacy concerns caused by the vast amount of personal and highly sensitive data. We identify 40+ challenges and systematize them into five main groups -- i) generation, ii) infrastructure & architecture, iii) governance, iv) compliance & regulation, and v) adoption. Additionally, we discuss a strategic and systematic approach that enterprises can employ to effectively address the challenges and achieve their goals by establishing trust in the implemented solutions.


An Overview on Generative AI at Scale with Edge-Cloud Computing

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

As a specific category of artificial intelligence (AI), generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) generates new content that resembles what is created by humans. The rapid development of GenAI systems has created a huge amount of new data on the Internet, posing new challenges to current computing and communication frameworks. Currently, GenAI services rely on the traditional cloud computing framework due to the need for large computation resources. However, such services will encounter high latency because of data transmission and a high volume of requests. On the other hand, edge-cloud computing can provide adequate computation power and low latency at the same time through the collaboration between edges and the cloud. Thus, it is attractive to build GenAI systems at scale by leveraging the edge-cloud computing paradigm. In this overview paper, we review recent developments in GenAI and edge-cloud computing, respectively. Then, we use two exemplary GenAI applications to discuss technical challenges in scaling up their solutions using edge-cloud collaborative systems. Finally, we list design considerations for training and deploying GenAI systems at scale and point out future research directions.


Opening up ChatGPT: Tracking openness, transparency, and accountability in instruction-tuned text generators

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Large language models that exhibit instruction-following behaviour represent one of the biggest recent upheavals in conversational interfaces, a trend in large part fuelled by the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT, a proprietary large language model for text generation fine-tuned through reinforcement learning from human feedback (LLM+RLHF). We review the risks of relying on proprietary software and survey the first crop of open-source projects of comparable architecture and functionality. The main contribution of this paper is to show that openness is differentiated, and to offer scientific documentation of degrees of openness in this fast-moving field. We evaluate projects in terms of openness of code, training data, model weights, RLHF data, licensing, scientific documentation, and access methods. We find that while there is a fast-growing list of projects billing themselves as 'open source', many inherit undocumented data of dubious legality, few share the all-important instruction-tuning (a key site where human annotation labour is involved), and careful scientific documentation is exceedingly rare. Degrees of openness are relevant to fairness and accountability at all points, from data collection and curation to model architecture, and from training and fine-tuning to release and deployment.


Deep Generative Models for Decision-Making and Control

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Deep model-based reinforcement learning methods offer a conceptually simple approach to the decision-making and control problem: use learning for the purpose of estimating an approximate dynamics model, and offload the rest of the work to classical trajectory optimization. However, this combination has a number of empirical shortcomings, limiting the usefulness of model-based methods in practice. The dual purpose of this thesis is to study the reasons for these shortcomings and to propose solutions for the uncovered problems. We begin by generalizing the dynamics model itself, replacing the standard single-step formulation with a model that predicts over probabilistic latent horizons. The resulting model, trained with a generative reinterpretation of temporal difference learning, leads to infinite-horizon variants of the procedures central to model-based control, including the model rollout and model-based value estimation.


A Comprehensive Survey on Generative Diffusion Models for Structured Data

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

In recent years, generative diffusion models have achieved a rapid paradigm shift in deep generative models by showing groundbreaking performance across various applications. Meanwhile, structured data, encompassing tabular and time series data, has been received comparatively limited attention from the deep learning research community, despite its omnipresence and extensive applications. Thus, there is still a lack of literature and its reviews on structured data modelling via diffusion models, compared to other data modalities such as visual and textual data. To address this gap, we present a comprehensive review of recently proposed diffusion models in the field of structured data. First, this survey provides a concise overview of the score-based diffusion model theory, subsequently proceeding to the technical descriptions of the majority of pioneering works that used structured data in both data-driven general tasks and domain-specific applications. Thereafter, we analyse and discuss the limitations and challenges shown in existing works and suggest potential research directions. We hope this review serves as a catalyst for the research community, promoting developments in generative diffusion models for structured data.


OpenAI co-founder warns 'superintelligent' AI must be controlled to prevent possible human extinction

FOX News

American Accountability Foundation spokesman Robert Donachie says the left is trying to use AI to'push their agenda on the American people.' A co-founder of artificial intelligence leader OpenAI is warning that superintelligence must be controlled in order to prevent the extinction of the human race. "Superintelligence will be the most impactful technology humanity has ever invented, and could help us solve many of the world's most important problems. But the vast power of superintelligence could also be very dangerous, and could lead to the disempowerment of humanity or even human extinction," Ilya Sutskever and head of alignment Jan Leike wrote in a Tuesday blog post, saying they believe such advancements could arrive as soon as this decade. They said managing such risks would require new institutions for governance and solving the problem of superintelligence alignment: ensuring AI systems much smarter than humans "follow human intent."