Late last month, after a year-plus wait, OpenAI quietly released the latest version of its image-generating AI program, DALL-E 3. The announcement was filled with stunning demos--including a minute-long video demonstrating how the technology could, given only a few chat prompts, create and merchandise a character for a children's story. But perhaps the widest-reaching and most consequential update came in two sentences slipped in at the end: "DALL-E 3 is designed to decline requests that ask for an image in the style of a living artist. Creators can now also opt their images out from training of our future image generation models." The language is a tacit response to hundreds of pages of litigation and countless articles accusing tech firms of stealing artists' work to train their AI software, and provides a window into the next stage of the battle between creators and AI companies. The second sentence, in particular, cuts to the core of debates over whether tech giants like OpenAI, Google, and Meta should be allowed to use human-made work to train AI models without the creator's permission--models that, artists say, are stealing their ideas and work opportunities.

Nowcasting day-ahead marginal emissions factors is increasingly important for power systems with high flexibility and penetration of distributed energy resources. With a significant share of firm generation from natural gas and coal power plants, forecasting day-ahead emissions in the current energy system has been widely studied. In contrast, as we shift to an energy system characterized by flexible power markets, dispatchable sources, and competing low-cost generation such as large-scale battery or hydrogen storage, system operators will be able to choose from a mix of different generation as well as emission pathways. To fully develop the emissions implications of a given dispatch schedule, we need a near real-time workflow with two layers. The first layer is a market model that continuously solves a security-constrained economic dispatch model. The second layer determines the marginal emissions based on the output of the market model, which is the subject of this paper. We propose using multi-headed convolutional neural networks to generate day-ahead forecasts of marginal and average emissions for a given independent system operator.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented performance in Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks. However, many existing studies have shown that they could be misused to generate undesired content. In response, before releasing LLMs for public access, model developers usually align those language models through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) or Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF). Consequently, those aligned large language models refuse to generate undesired content when facing potentially harmful/unethical requests. A natural question is "could alignment really prevent those open-sourced large language models from being misused to generate undesired content?". In this work, we provide a negative answer to this question. In particular, we show those open-sourced, aligned large language models could be easily misguided to generate undesired content without heavy computations or careful prompt designs. Our key idea is to directly manipulate the generation process of open-sourced LLMs to misguide it to generate undesired content including harmful or biased information and even private data. We evaluate our method on 4 open-sourced LLMs accessible publicly and our finding highlights the need for more advanced mitigation strategies for open-sourced LLMs. Warning: This paper contains examples of harmful language generated by LLMs. Since the release of ChatGPT (Brown et al., 2020; OpenAI, 2023a;b), extensive attention has been paid to the development and application of Large Language Models (LLMs). Over the past year, many advanced LLMs (Touvron et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2023; Dettmers et al., 2023; Zeng et al., 2022) have been open-sourced on model-sharing platforms such as HuggingFace (HuggingFace, 2023a). On the other hand, in practice, most LLMs are trained on publicly available online corpora (OpenAI, 2023b; Touvron et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2023). Consequently, LLMs have unavoidably viewed harmful content during the training phase, which naturally raises the concern that LLMs can be misused to generate such content, e.g., retrieving information about harmful topics like cybercrime (Kang et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023; Greshake et al., 2023; Zou et al., 2023). In response, LLM developers (e.g., OpenAI) commonly align LLMs through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) or Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) so that LLMs will not generate undesired content (OpenAI, 2023b; Touvron et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023). For instance, OpenAI adopted SFT and RLHF to develop powerful LLMs such as InstructGPT (Ouyang et al., 2022) and ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2023a) with remarkable improvement in understanding human instructions and avoiding undesired output. Si et al. (2023) adopted prompt tuning to remove biased content in responses generated by GPT-3 (Brown et al., 2020).

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has become a pivot technique in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. In RLHF practice, preference data plays a crucial role in bridging human proclivity and LLMs. However, the scarcity of diverse, naturalistic datasets of human preferences on LLM outputs at scale poses a great challenge to RLHF as well as feedback learning research within the open-source community. Current preference datasets, either proprietary or limited in size and prompt variety, result in limited RLHF adoption in open-source models and hinder further exploration. We meticulously devise annotation instructions and employ GPT-4 to offer detailed feedback in both numerical and textual forms. Experimental results indicate that our models outperform existing open-source models, achieving top performance across multiple benchmarks. Large language models (LLMs), represented by ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2022) and GPT-4 (OpenAI, 2023), have demonstrated proficiency in generating fluent text as well as solving various languageoriented tasks. Trained on massive corpora through likelihood maximization techniques, these LLMs have exhibited remarkable generalization and equipped the ability to execute diverse tasks in response to user directives (Ouyang et al., 2022; Wei et al., 2022; Sanh et al., 2022). Unfortunately, relying solely on likelihood maximization during training leads to well-known issues - LLMs may generate convincing but incorrect or unsafe content that deviates from human preferences (Stiennon et al., 2020; Ouyang et al., 2022; Perez et al., 2022). To further align LLMs with human preferences, reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) (Ouyang et al., 2022; Askell et al., 2021; Bai et al., 2022a; Touvron et al., 2023b) has been introduced and widely adopted by leading corporations. RLHF builds upon preference data, which rates and compares different responses given the same prompt. Typically, RLHF trains a reward model on preference data and then applies RL algorithms such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) (Schulman et al., 2017) on LLMs to optimize the rewards (OpenAI, 2022; 2023; Touvron et al., 2023b; Bai et al., 2022a). While proprietary models have largely capitalized on RLHF's potential to produce outputs that are both more useful and safer, a significant gap persists in the open-source community. As a result, few open-source models adopt RLHF as it demonstrates marginal gains, which critically hinders successful RLHF practice and further research.

Users are increasingly being warned to check AI-generated content for correctness. Still, as LLMs (and other generative models) generate more complex output, such as summaries, tables, or code, it becomes harder for the user to audit or evaluate the output for quality or correctness. Hence, we are seeing the emergence of tool-assisted experiences to help the user double-check a piece of AI-generated content. We refer to these as co-audit tools. Co-audit tools complement prompt engineering techniques: one helps the user construct the input prompt, while the other helps them check the output response. As a specific example, this paper describes recent research on co-audit tools for spreadsheet computations powered by generative models. We explain why co-audit experiences are essential for any application of generative AI where quality is important and errors are consequential (as is common in spreadsheet computations). We propose a preliminary list of principles for co-audit, and outline research challenges.

Safety lies at the core of developing and deploying large language models (LLMs). Experimental results show that all LLMs produce significantly more unsafe responses for non-English queries than English ones, indicating the necessity of developing safety alignment for non-English languages. In addition, we propose several simple and effective prompting methods to improve the multilingual safety of ChatGPT by evoking safety knowledge and improving cross-lingual generalization of safety alignment. Our prompting method can significantly reduce the ratio of unsafe responses from 19.1% to 9.7% for non-English queries Recent advances in scaling large language models (LLMs) have made breakthroughs in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) area. With the rapid increase of model parameters and training data, LLMs have gained emergent abilities in various tasks, including writing assistance Gao et al. (2022), code generation Gao et al. (2023), machine translation Jiao et al. (2023), and so on. Due to their impressive performance, a number of LLMs have been launched by commercial companies and academic institutions, including OpenAI's GPT models Brown et al. (2020); OpenAI (2022), Google's Bard Pichai (2023), and Meta's LLaMA Touvron et al. (2023a;b). Such extensive deployment underscores an imperative of paramount significance: ensuring the safety of LLMs. There has been a number of work for aligning LLMs with human ethics and preferences to improve their safety, including data filtering (Xu et al., 2020; Welbl et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022), supervised fine-tuning (Ouyang et al., 2022), reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) (Christiano et al., 2017), and red teaming (Perez et al., 2022; Ganguli et al., 2022a). Most of the existing work on safety alignment has focused on the interaction in English OpenAI (2023). However, as globally deployed services, LLMs, such as ChatGPT, have users around the world and are frequently engaged in non-English communication with users from non-English-speaking regions.

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are fundamentally reshaping computing, with large language models (LLMs) now effectively being able to generate and interpret source code and natural language instructions. These emergent capabilities have sparked urgent questions in the computing education community around how educators should adapt their pedagogy to address the challenges and to leverage the opportunities presented by this new technology. In this working group report, we undertake a comprehensive exploration of LLMs in the context of computing education and make five significant contributions. First, we provide a detailed review of the literature on LLMs in computing education and synthesise findings from 71 primary articles. Second, we report the findings of a survey of computing students and instructors from across 20 countries, capturing prevailing attitudes towards LLMs and their use in computing education contexts. Third, to understand how pedagogy is already changing, we offer insights collected from in-depth interviews with 22 computing educators from five continents who have already adapted their curricula and assessments. Fourth, we use the ACM Code of Ethics to frame a discussion of ethical issues raised by the use of large language models in computing education, and we provide concrete advice for policy makers, educators, and students. Finally, we benchmark the performance of LLMs on various computing education datasets, and highlight the extent to which the capabilities of current models are rapidly improving. Our aim is that this report will serve as a focal point for both researchers and practitioners who are exploring, adapting, using, and evaluating LLMs and LLM-based tools in computing classrooms.

The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has catalyzed revolutionary changes across various sectors, notably in healthcare. Among the significant developments in this field are the applications of generative AI models, specifically transformers and diffusion models. These models have played a crucial role in analyzing diverse forms of data, including medical imaging (encompassing image reconstruction, image-to-image translation, image generation, and image classification), protein structure prediction, clinical documentation, diagnostic assistance, radiology interpretation, clinical decision support, medical coding, and billing, as well as drug design and molecular representation. Such applications have enhanced clinical diagnosis, data reconstruction, and drug synthesis. This review paper aims to offer a thorough overview of the generative AI applications in healthcare, focusing on transformers and diffusion models. Additionally, we propose potential directions for future research to tackle the existing limitations and meet the evolving demands of the healthcare sector. Intended to serve as a comprehensive guide for researchers and practitioners interested in the healthcare applications of generative AI, this review provides valuable insights into the current state of the art, challenges faced, and prospective future directions.

OpenAI recently announced an upgrade to ChatGPT (Apple, Android) that adds two features: AI voice options to hear the chatbot responding to your prompts, and image analysis capabilities. The image function is similar to what's already available for free with Google's Bard chatbot. Even after hours of testing the limits and capabilities of ChatGPT, OpenAI's chatbot still manages to surprise and scare me at the same time. Yes, I was quite impressed with the web browsing beta offered through ChatGPT Plus, but I remained anxious about the tool's ramifications for people who write for money online, among many other concerns. The new image feature arriving for OpenAI's subscribers left me with similarly mixed feelings.

ChatGPT took the world by storm when it hit the market, allowing people in all sorts of roles to soar through work. While interest has slowed down a bit, the utility certainly hasn't. But if you want to get the most out of ChatGPT, you need to know how to properly use it. That's where The Complete ChatGPT Artificial Intelligence OpenAI Training Bundle and it's reduced in price now through 9/30. This bundle includes four courses, including one for absolute beginners.