Machine learning has shown promise in network intrusion detection systems, yet its performance often degrades due to concept drift and imbalanced data. These challenges are compounded by the labor-intensive process of labeling network traffic, especially when dealing with evolving and rare attack types, which makes selecting the right data for adaptation difficult. To address these issues, we propose a generative active adaptation framework that minimizes labeling effort while enhancing model robustness. Our approach employs density-aware active sampling to identify the most informative samples for annotation and leverages deep generative models to synthesize diverse samples, thereby augmenting the training set and mitigating the effects of concept drift. We evaluate our end-to-end framework on both simulated IDS data and a real-world ISP dataset, demonstrating significant improvements in intrusion detection performance. Our method boosts the overall F1-score from 0.60 (without adaptation) to 0.86. Rare attacks such as Infiltration, Web Attack, and FTP-BruteForce, which originally achieve F1 scores of 0.001, 0.04, and 0.00, improve to 0.30, 0.50, and 0.71, respectively, with generative active adaptation in the CIC-IDS 2018 dataset. Our framework effectively enhances rare attack detection while reducing labeling costs, making it a scalable and adaptive solution for real-world intrusion detection.

Large language models (LLMs), initially developed for generative AI, are now evolving into agentic AI systems, which make decisions in complex, real-world contexts. Unfortunately, while their generative capabilities are well-documented, their decision-making processes remain poorly understood. This is particularly evident when models are handling exceptions, a critical and challenging aspect of decision-making made relevant by the inherent incompleteness of contracts. Here we demonstrate that LLMs, even ones that excel at reasoning, deviate significantly from human judgments because they adhere strictly to policies, even when such adherence is impractical, suboptimal, or even counterproductive. We then evaluate three approaches to tuning AI agents to handle exceptions: ethical framework prompting, chain-of-thought reasoning, and supervised fine-tuning. We find that while ethical framework prompting fails and chain-of-thought prompting provides only slight improvements, supervised fine-tuning, specifically with human explanations, yields markedly better results. Surprisingly, in our experiments, supervised fine-tuning even enabled models to generalize human-like decision-making to novel scenarios, demonstrating transfer learning of human-aligned decision-making across contexts. Furthermore, fine-tuning with explanations, not just labels, was critical for alignment, suggesting that aligning LLMs with human judgment requires explicit training on how decisions are made, not just which decisions are made. These findings highlight the need to address LLMs' shortcomings in handling exceptions in order to guide the development of agentic AI toward models that can effectively align with human judgment and simultaneously adapt to novel contexts.

Recent advancements in multimodal Generative AI have the potential to democratize specialized architectural tasks, such as interpreting technical drawings and creating 3D CAD models, which traditionally require expert knowledge. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two systems: GPT-4o and Claude 3.5, in the task of architectural 3D synthesis. We conduct a case study on two buildings from Palladio's Four Books of Architecture (1965): Villa Rotonda and Palazzo Porto. High-level architectural models and drawings of these buildings were prepared, inspired by Palladio's original texts and drawings. Through sequential text and image prompting, we assess the systems' abilities in (1) interpreting 2D and 3D representations of buildings from drawings, (2) encoding the buildings into a CAD software script, and (3) self-improving based on outputs. While both systems successfully generate individual parts, they struggle to accurately assemble these parts into the desired spatial relationships, with Claude 3.5 demonstrating better performance, particularly in self-correcting its output. This study contributes to ongoing research on benchmarking the strengths and weaknesses of off-the-shelf AI systems in performing intelligent human tasks that require discipline-specific knowledge. The findings highlight the potential of language-enabled AI systems to act as collaborative technical assistants in the architectural design process.

Over recent years, the rapid evolution and progress of generative models have opened new possibilities in manipulating images, audio, and text, both independently and in a multimodal context. These AI advancements have ignited considerable debate about the essence of these human-engineered "intelligences". Critics have termed large language models (LLMs) as "statistical parrots" (Bender et al., 2021) due to their reliance on data. However, others view them as advanced tools capable of emulating and exploring the intricate structures of the human brain (Zhao et al., 2023; Abbasiantaeb et al., 2024; Fayyaz et al., 2024). Despite this division, it has become increasingly clear that limiting these models to a few specialized areas greatly restricts their potential to fully grasp and portray the complexity of the world. Therefore the integration of sensory modalities through technology, particularly using AI, has emerged as a compelling frontier in computer science and cognitive research (Murari et al., 2020; Turato et al., 2022). As multimodal AI models advance, they increasingly offer innovative solutions for bridging human experiences and machine understanding across diverse sensory domains. These models, which merge information from different modalities enable machines to interpret complex real-world scenarios and provide more nuanced outputs. While recent research has predominantly focused on the intersection of audio and visual modalities, the potential for integrating taste and sound remains relatively unexplored.

Motivated by the pursuit of safe, reliable, and weather-tolerant urban air mobility (UAM) solutions, this work proposes a generative modeling approach for characterizing microweather wind velocities. Microweather, or the weather conditions in highly localized areas, is particularly complex in urban environments owing to the chaotic and turbulent nature of wind flows. Furthermore, traditional means of assessing local wind fields are not generally viable solutions for UAM applications: 1) field measurements that would rely on permanent wind profiling systems in operational air space are not practical, 2) physics-based models that simulate fluid dynamics at a sufficiently high resolution are not computationally tractable, and 3) data-driven modeling approaches that are largely deterministic ignore the inherent variability in turbulent flows that dictates UAM reliability. Thus, advancements in predictive capabilities are needed to help mitigate the unique operational safety risks that microweather winds pose for smaller, lighter weight UAM aircraft. This work aims to model microweather wind velocities in a manner that is computationally-efficient, captures random variability, and would only require a temporary, rather than permanent, field measurement campaign. Inspired by recent breakthroughs in conditional generative AI such as text-to-image generation, the proposed approach learns a probabilistic macro-to-microweather mapping between regional weather forecasts and measured local wind velocities using generative modeling (denoising diffusion probabilistic models, flow matching, and Gaussian mixture models). A simple proof of concept was implemented using a dataset comprised of local (micro) measurements from a Sonic Detection and Ranging (SoDAR) wind profiler along with (macro) forecast data from a nearby weather station over the same time period.

To lower the barrier of telling appealing and effective stories, researchers have spent considerable efforts to build AI-powered tools to facilitate their creation and communication with different strategies of human-AI collaboration [29]. In these tools, AI collaborators are often powered by heuristic-based methods [57], traditional machine learning models [13], or smaller-scale deep learning models [36]. Compared to the previous techniques for AI collaborators, the recently emerging large-scale generative AI models, including the text-to-image models [62] and large language models (LLMs) [69], can achieve better performance on various data storytelling-related tasks, such as data analysis [20] and text generation [72], and enhance the communication between humans and AI with conversations. These advantages indicate their potentials to be game-changers in the research direction of human-AI collaboration for data storytelling, including improving the experience of collaborating with AI and diversifying the collaboration patterns between humans and AI [29]. After two years of the public access of these models, it is a critical time point to reflect how this research discipline progresses in the new era of large-scale generative AI models and identify future opportunities. To achieve the goal, it is essential not only to focus on how these generative AI techniques are applied in existing tools, as explored in a previous survey [17], but more importantly, to compare the human-AI collaboration patterns in the latest tools in the generative AI era with those in earlier ones. Only through this comparison can we understand the shift in human-AI collaboration paradigms, identify the value of these powerful techniques in enhancing human-AI collaboration, and propose future research directions.

The use of large language model (LLM)-powered chatbots, such as ChatGPT, has become popular across various domains, supporting a range of tasks and processes. However, due to the intrinsic complexity of LLMs, effective prompting is more challenging than it may seem. This highlights the need for innovative educational and support strategies that are both widely accessible and seamlessly integrated into task workflows. Yet, LLM prompting is highly task- and domain-dependent, limiting the effectiveness of generic approaches. In this study, we explore whether LLM-based methods can facilitate learning assessments by using ad-hoc guidelines and a minimal number of annotated prompt samples. Our framework transforms these guidelines into features that can be identified within learners' prompts. Using these feature descriptions and annotated examples, we create few-shot learning detectors. We then evaluate different configurations of these detectors, testing three state-of-the-art LLMs and ensembles. We run experiments with cross-validation on a sample of original prompts, as well as tests on prompts collected from task-naive learners. Our results show how LLMs perform on feature detection. Notably, GPT- 4 demonstrates strong performance on most features, while closely related models, such as GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Turbo (Instruct), show inconsistent behaviors in feature classification. These differences highlight the need for further research into how design choices impact feature selection and prompt detection. Our findings contribute to the fields of generative AI literacy and computer-supported learning assessment, offering valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners.

Accordingly, education researchers and practitioners have increasingly turned to AI literacy as an important learning objective. However, the definition of AI literacy remains vague. Researchers have used the term to describe learning interventions that differ by in school contexts, learning objectives, and types of AI technologies they use. Furthermore, the research of AI literacy is shifting significantly in the wake of generative AI. Thus, it is crucial to review the field and develop a conceptual framework that captures the diverse conceptualizations of AI literacy. The concept of AI literacy and recognition of its potential significance are well-established [75, 127]. One of the pioneering works by Touretzky et al. in 2019 laid out "five big ideas" for the AI4K12 initiative: "computers perceive the world using sensors", "agents maintain models/representations of the world and use them for reasoning", "computers can learn from data", "making agents interact with humans is a substantial challenge for AI developers", and "AI applications can impact society in both positive and negative ways" [127]. This paper had a major influence on subsequent AI literacy curriculum design. The next year, another prominent work by Long and Magerko defined AI literacy as "a set

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is profoundly transforming human society and concurrently presenting a series of ethical, legal, and social issues. The effective governance of AI has become a crucial global concern. Since 2022, the extensive deployment of generative AI, particularly large language models, marked a new phase in AI governance. Continuous efforts are being made by the international community in actively addressing the novel challenges posed by these AI developments. As consensus on international governance continues to be established and put into action, the practical importance of conducting a global assessment of the state of AI governance is progressively coming to light. In this context, we initiated the development of the AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index). Adhering to the design principle, "the level of governance should match the level of development," the inaugural evaluation of the AGILE Index commences with an exploration of four foundational pillars: the development level of AI, the AI governance environment, the AI governance instruments, and the AI governance effectiveness. It covers 39 indicators across 18 dimensions to comprehensively assess the AI governance level of 14 representative countries globally. The index is utilized to delve into the status of AI governance to date in 14 countries for the first batch of evaluation. The aim is to depict the current state of AI governance in these countries through data scoring, assist them in identifying their governance stage and uncovering governance issues, and ultimately offer insights for the enhancement of their AI governance systems.

Synthetic tabular data have widespread applications in industrial domains such as healthcare, finance, and supply chains, owing to their potential to protect privacy and mitigate data scarcity. However, generating realistic synthetic tabular data while preserving inter-column logical relationships remains a significant challenge for the existing generative models. To address these challenges, we propose LLM-TabFlow, a novel approach that leverages Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning to capture complex inter-column relationships and compress tabular data, while using Score-based Diffusion to model the distribution of the compressed data in latent space. Additionally, we introduce an evaluation framework, which is absent in literature, to fairly assess the performance of synthetic tabular data generation methods in real-world contexts. Using this framework, we conduct extensive experiments on two real-world industrial datasets, evaluating LLM-TabFlow against other five baseline methods, including SMOTE (an interpolation-based approach) and other state-of-the-art generative models. Our results show that LLM-TabFlow outperforms all baselines, fully preserving inter-column relationships while achieving the best balance between data fidelity, utility, and privacy. This study is the first to explicitly address inter-column relationship preservation in synthetic tabular data generation, offering new insights for developing more realistic and reliable tabular data generation methods.