Automated clinical risk prediction from electronic health records (EHRs) demands modeling both structured diagnostic codes and unstructured narrative notes. However, most prior approaches either handle these modalities separately or rely on simplistic fusion strategies that ignore the directional, hierarchical causal interactions by which narrative observations precipitate diagnoses and propagate risk across admissions. In this paper, we propose THCM-CAL, a Temporal-Hierarchical Causal Model with Conformal Calibration. Our framework constructs a multimodal causal graph where nodes represent clinical entities from two modalities: Textual propositions extracted from notes and ICD codes mapped to textual descriptions. Through hierarchical causal discovery, THCM-CAL infers three clinically grounded interactions: intra-slice same-modality sequencing, intra-slice cross-modality triggers, and inter-slice risk propagation. To enhance prediction reliability, we extend conformal prediction to multi-label ICD coding, calibrating per-code confidence intervals under complex co-occurrences. Experimental results on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV demonstrate the superiority of THCM-CAL.

Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL) is a powerful self-supervised learning framework that performs data augmentation through graph perturbations, with growing applications in the analysis of biological networks such as Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs). The artificial perturbations commonly used in GCL, such as node dropping, induce structural changes that can diverge from biological reality. This concern has contributed to a broader trend in graph representation learning toward augmentation-free methods, which view such structural changes as problematic and to be avoided. However, this trend overlooks the fundamental insight that structural changes from biologically meaningful perturbations are not a problem to be avoided but a rich source of information, thereby ignoring the valuable opportunity to leverage data from real biological experiments. Motivated by this insight, we propose SupGCL (Supervised Graph Contrastive Learning), a new GCL method for GRNs that directly incorporates biological perturbations from gene knockdown experiments as supervision. SupGCL is a probabilistic formulation that continuously generalizes conventional GCL, linking artificial augmentations with real perturbations measured in knockdown experiments and using the latter as explicit supervisory signals. To assess effectiveness, we train GRN representations with SupGCL and evaluate their performance on downstream tasks. The evaluation includes both node-level tasks, such as gene function classification, and graph-level tasks on patient-specific GRNs, such as patient survival hazard prediction. Across 13 tasks built from GRN datasets derived from patients with three cancer types, SupGCL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Graph representation learning has recently attracted attention in various fields to learn a meaningful latent space to represent the connectivity and attributes in given graphs (Ju et al., 2024). The application of graph representation learning to Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs), which contain information about intracellular functions and processes, is particularly important in the fields of biology and drug discovery. It is expected to contribute to the identification of therapeutic targets and the elucidation of disease mechanisms. Representation learning for GRNs has been applied to tasks such as transcription factor inference (Y u et al., 2025) and predicting drug responses in cancer cell lines (Liu et al., 2022). Advances in gene expression measurement and analysis technologies have enabled the construction of patient-specific GRNs, highlighting gene regulation patterns that differ from the population as a whole (Nakazawa et al., 2021). Hereafter, this paper will refer to such individualized networks simply as GRNs.

--Inherent in virtually every iterative machine learning algorithm is the problem of hyper-parameter tuning which includes three major design parameters: (a) the complexity of the model, e.g., the number of neurons in a neural network, (b) the initial conditions, which heavily affect the behavior of the algorithm, and (c) the dissimilarity measure used to quantify its performance. We introduce an online prototype-based learning algorithm that can be viewed as a progressively growing competitive-learning neural network architecture for classification and clustering. The learning rule of the proposed approach is formulated as an online gradient-free stochastic approximation algorithm that solves a sequence of appropriately defined optimization problems, simulating an annealing process. The annealing nature of the algorithm contributes to avoiding poor local minima, offers robustness with respect to the initial conditions, and provides a means to progressively increase the complexity of the learning model, through an intuitive bifurcation phenomenon. The proposed approach is interpretable, requires minimal hyper-parameter tuning, and allows online control over the performance-complexity trade-off. Finally, we show that Bregman divergences appear naturally as a family of dissimilarity measures that play a central role in both the performance and the computational complexity of the learning algorithm. EARNING from data samples has become an important component of artificial intelligence. While virtually all learning problems can be formulated as constrained stochastic optimization problems, the optimization methods can be intractable, typically dealing with mixed constraints and very large, or even infinite-dimensional spaces [1]. For this reason, feature extraction, model selection and design, and analysis of optimization methods, have been the cornerstone of machine learning algorithms from their genesis until today. Deep learning methods, currently dominating the field of machine learning due to their performance in multiple applications, attempt to learn feature representations from data, using biologically-inspired models in artificial neural networks [2], [3]. Manuscript published in the IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (TNNLS).

Delays frequently occur in real-world environments, yet standard reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms often assume instantaneous perception of the environment. We study random sensor delays in POMDPs, where observations may arrive out-of-sequence, a setting that has not been previously addressed in RL. We analyze the structure of such delays and demonstrate that naive approaches, such as stacking past observations, are insufficient for reliable performance. To address this, we propose a model-based filtering process that sequentially updates the belief state based on an incoming stream of observations. We then introduce a simple delay-aware framework that incorporates this idea into model-based RL, enabling agents to effectively handle random delays. Applying this framework to Dreamer, we compare our approach to delay-aware baselines developed for MDPs. Our method consistently outperforms these baselines and demonstrates robustness to delay distribution shifts during deployment. Additionally, we present experiments on simulated robotic tasks, comparing our method to common practical heuristics and emphasizing the importance of explicitly modeling observation delays.

Abstract-- Long-horizon, high-dynamic motion tracking on humanoids remains brittle because absolute joint commands cannot compensate model-plant mismatch, leading to error accumulation. We propose RobotDancing, a simple, scalable framework that predicts residual joint targets to explicitly correct dynamics discrepancies. The pipeline is end-to-end--training, sim-to-sim validation, and zero-shot sim-to-real--and uses a single-stage reinforcement learning (RL) setup with a unified observation, reward, and hyperparameter configuration. RobotDancing can track multi-minute, high-energy behaviors (jumps, spins, cartwheels) and deploys zero-shot to hardware with high motion tracking quality. I. INTRODUCTION Humanoid robots are increasingly expected to execute long-horizon, highly dynamic behaviors such as dance, where small tracking errors compound rapidly and destabilize control. A principal source of such drift is the mismatch between idealized reference trajectories and the robot's true physics (actuation limits, friction, inertia, latency).

A deep dive into the open literature shows that there are t hree fundamental limitations to current ML approaches, namely blackbox brittleness (which renders models uninterpretable and unreliable under distribution shift [2]), causal blindness (which conflates correlation with causation [3]), and alignment failures (which produce systems optimizing objectives misaligned with human values [4]) . These deficiencies stem from a profound philosophical poverty in how ML conceptualizes knowledge, reasoning, and values. The first fundamental limitation, b lackbox brittleness, manifests when trained models fail on seemingly trivial variations of their training distribution. For example, a vision model that accurately identifies stop signs under normal conditions might misclassify them entirely when small adversarial perturbations are applied [5] . Not surprisingly, t h e same brittleness extends beyond adversarial examples to everyday distribution shifts (e.g., natural language processing models exhibit performance degradation when processing text from different cultural contexts, etc.) [6] .