We cast the problem as one of maximum likelihood density estimation, andin that framework introduce an algorithm that searches for independent components using both temporal and spatial cues. We call the resulting algorithm "Contextual ICA," after the (Bell and Sejnowski 1995) Infomax algorithm, which we show to be a special case of cICA. Because cICA can make use of the temporal structure of its input, it is able separate in a number of situations where standard methods cannot, including sources with low kurtosis, coloredGaussian sources, and sources which have Gaussian histograms. 1 The Blind Source Separation Problem Consider a set of n indepent sources

The essential property of BBNs is summarized by the Markov condition, which asserts that each variable is independent of its non-descendants given its parents.

These include Boltzmann machines (Hinton and Sejnowski 1986),binary sigmoidal belief networks (Neal 1992) and Helmholtz machines (Hinton et al. 1995; Dayan et al. 1995). However, some hidden variables, such as translation or scaling in images of shapes, are best represented using continuous values.Continuous-valued Boltzmann machines have been developed (Movellan and McClelland 1993), but these suffer from long simulation settling times and the requirement of a "negative phase" during learning. Tibshirani (1992) and Bishop et al. (1996) consider learning mappings from a continuous latent variable space to a higher-dimensional input space. MacKay (1995) has developed "density networks" that can model both continuous and categorical latent spaces using stochasticity at the topmost network layer. In this paper I consider a new hierarchical top-down connectionist model that has stochastic hidden variables at all layers; moreover, these variables can adapt to be continuous or categorical. The proposed top-down model can be viewed as a continuous-valued belief network, whichcan be simulated by performing a quick top-down pass (Pearl 1988).

In most treatments of the regression problem it is assumed that the distribution of target data can be described by a deterministic function of the inputs, together with additive Gaussian noise having constantvariance. The use of maximum likelihood to train such models then corresponds to the minimization of a sum-of-squares error function. In many applications a more realistic model would allow the noise variance itself to depend on the input variables. However, the use of maximum likelihood to train such models would give highly biased results. In this paper we show how a Bayesian treatment can allow for an input-dependent variance while overcoming thebias of maximum likelihood. 1 Introduction In regression problems it is important not only to predict the output variables but also to have some estimate of the error bars associated with those predictions.

The full Bayesian method for applying neural networks to a prediction problemis to set up the prior/hyperprior structure for the net and then perform the necessary integrals. However, these integrals arenot tractable analytically, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are slow, especially if the parameter space is high-dimensional. Using Gaussian processes we can approximate the weight space integral analytically, so that only a small number of hyperparameters need be integrated over by MCMC methods. We have applied this idea to classification problems, obtaining excellent resultson the real-world problems investigated so far. 1 INTRODUCTION To make predictions based on a set of training data, fundamentally we need to combine our prior beliefs about possible predictive functions with the data at hand. In the Bayesian approach to neural networks a prior on the weights in the net induces a prior distribution over functions.

Neural Computing Research Group Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, U.K. http://www.ncrg.aston.ac.uk/ Abstract The techniques of Bayesian inference have been applied with great success to many problems in neural computing including evaluation of regression functions, determination of error bars on predictions, and the treatment of hyper-parameters. However, the problem of model comparison is a much more challenging one for which current techniques have significant limitations. In this paper we show how an extended form of Markov chain Monte Carlo, called chaining, is able to provide effective estimates of the relative probabilities of different models. We present results from the robot arm problem and compare them with the corresponding results obtained using the standard Gaussian approximation framework. Initially this is chosen to be some prior distribution p(wIM), which can be combined with a likelihood function p( Dlw, M) using Bayes' theorem to give a posterior distribution p(wID, M) in the form ( ID M) p(Dlw,M)p(wIM) p w, p(DIM) (1) where D is the data set. Predictions of the model are obtained by performing integrations weighted by the posterior distribution.

For neural networks with a wide class of weight-priors, it can be shown that in the limit of an infinite number of hidden units the prior over functions tends to a Gaussian process. In this paper analytic formsare derived for the covariance function of the Gaussian processes corresponding to networks with sigmoidal and Gaussian hidden units. This allows predictions to be made efficiently using networks with an infinite number of hidden units, and shows that, somewhat paradoxically, it may be easier to compute with infinite networks than finite ones. 1 Introduction To someone training a neural network by maximizing the likelihood of a finite amount of data it makes no sense to use a network with an infinite number of hidden units; the network will "overfit" the data and so will be expected to generalize poorly. However, the idea of selecting the network size depending on the amount of training data makes little sense to a Bayesian; a model should be chosen that reflects the understanding of the problem, and then application of Bayes' theorem allows inference to be carried out (at least in theory) after the data is observed. In the Bayesian treatment of neural networks, a question immediately arises as to how many hidden units are believed to be appropriate for a task. Neal (1996) has argued compellingly that for real-world problems, there is no reason to believe that neural network models should be limited to nets containing only a "small" number of hidden units. He has shown that it is sensible to consider a limit where the number of hidden units in a net tends to infinity, and that good predictions can be obtained from such models using the Bayesian machinery. He has also shown that for fixed hyperparameters, a large class of neural network models will converge to a Gaussian process prior over functions in the limit of an infinite number of hidden units.

It is shown that conventional computers can be exponentiallx faster than planar Hopfield networks: although there are planar Hopfield networks that take exponential time to converge, a stable state of an arbitrary planar Hopfield network can be found by a conventional computer in polynomial time.

In the Bayes approach to statistical inference [Berger, 1985] one assumes that the prior uncertainty about parameters of an unknown data generating mechanism can be encoded in a probability distribution, the so called prior. Using the prior and the likelihood of the data given the parameters, the posterior distribution of the parameters can be derived from Bayes rule. From this posterior, various estimates for functions ofthe parameter, like predictions about unseen data, can be calculated. However, in general, those predictions cannot be realised by specific parameter values, but only by an ensemble average over parameters according to the posterior probability. Hence,exact implementations of Bayes method for neural networks require averages over network parameters which in general can be performed by time consuming 226 M.Opper and O. Winther Monte Carlo procedures.

This paper develops arguments for a family of temporal log-linear models to represent spatiotemporal correlations among the spiking events in a group of neurons. The models can represent not just pairwise correlations but also correlations of higher order. Methods are discussed for inferring the existence or absence of correlations and estimating their strength. A frequentist and a Bayesian approach to correlation detection are compared.