We classify .NET files as either benign or malicious by examining certain directed graphs extracted from the files via decompilation. Each graph is viewed probabilistically as a Markov chain where each node heuristically represents the possible state of the running file, and by computing the PageRank vector (Perron vector with transport) we can assign a probability measure over the nodes of the given graph. We train a random forest with features derived from computing Lebesgue antiderivatives of functions defined over the vertex sets of the graphs listed above against the PageRank measure. The model was trained on 2.5 million samples of .NET and has an accuracy of 98.3\% on test data. The median time needed for decompilation and scoring was 24ms.

Naive Bayes is the most simple algorithm that you can apply to your data. As the name suggests, here this algorithm makes an assumption as all the variables in the dataset is "Naive" i.e not correlated to each other. Naive Bayes is a very popular classification algorithm that is mostly used to get the base accuracy of the dataset. Let's assume that you are walking on the playground. Now you see some red object in front of you.

Still confused about deep learning, how it works, what is its shortcomings, and what is its origins? Paraphrasing Zoubin: Deep learning is neural networks rebranded. Compute power enables us to run many layers of weighted computational neurons, hence the phrase "deep". They are data hungry, computationally intensive, uninterpretable black boxes that can be easily fooled. But ... They can do amazing things and using them is becoming easier.

Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) hold great promise as a flexible and principled solution to deal with uncertainty when learning from finite data. Among approaches to realize probabilistic inference in deep neural networks, variational Bayes (VB) is theoretically grounded, generally applicable, and computationally efficient. With wide recognition of potential advantages, why is it that variational Bayes has seen very limited practical use for BNNs in real applications? We argue that variational inference in neural networks is fragile: successful implementations require careful initialization and tuning of prior variances, as well as controlling the variance of Monte Carlo gradient estimates. We fix VB and turn it into a robust inference tool for Bayesian neural networks. We achieve this with two innovations: first, we introduce a novel deterministic method to approximate moments in neural networks, eliminating gradient variance; second, we introduce a hierarchical prior for parameters and a novel empirical Bayes procedure for automatically selecting prior variances. Combining these two innovations, the resulting method is highly efficient and robust. On the application of heteroscedastic regression we demonstrate strong predictive performance over alternative approaches.

The pattern theory of Grenander is a mathematical framework where the patterns are represented by probability models on random variables of algebraic structures. In this paper, we review three families of probability models, namely, the discriminative models, the descriptive models, and the generative models. A discriminative model is in the form of a classifier. It specifies the conditional probability of the class label given the input signal. The descriptive model specifies the probability distribution of the signal, based on an energy function defined on the signal. A generative model assumes that the signal is generated by some latent variables via a transformation. We shall review these models within a common framework and explore their connections. We shall also review the recent developments that take advantage of the high approximation capacities of deep neural networks.

In the context of recent deep clustering studies, discriminative models dominate the literature and report the most competitive performances. These models learn a deep discriminative neural network classifier in which the labels are latent. Typically, they use multinomial logistic regression posteriors and parameter regularization, as is very common in supervised learning. It is generally acknowledged that discriminative objective functions (e.g., those based on the mutual information or the KL divergence) are more flexible than generative approaches (e.g., K-means) in the sense that they make fewer assumptions about the data distributions and, typically, yield much better unsupervised deep learning results. On the surface, several recent discriminative models may seem unrelated to K-means. This study shows that these models are, in fact, equivalent to K-means under mild conditions and common posterior models and parameter regularization. We prove that, for the commonly used logistic regression posteriors, maximizing the $L_2$ regularized mutual information via an approximate alternating direction method (ADM) is equivalent to a soft and regularized K-means loss. Our theoretical analysis not only connects directly several recent state-of-the-art discriminative models to K-means, but also leads to a new soft and regularized deep K-means algorithm, which yields competitive performance on several image clustering benchmarks.

The resulting collision avoidance strategy can be represented as a numeric table. This methodology has been used in the development of the Airborne Collision Avoidance System X (ACAS X) family of collision avoidance systems for manned and unmanned aircraft, but the high dimensionality of the state space leads to very large tables. To improve storage efficiency, a deep neural network is used to approximate the table. With the use of an asymmetric loss function and a gradient descent algorithm, the parameters for this network can be trained to provide accurate estimates of table values while preserving the relative preferences of the possible advisories for each state. By training multiple networks to represent subtables, the network also decreases the required runtime for computing the collision avoidance advisory. Simulation studies show that the network improves the safety and efficiency of the collision avoidance system. Because only the network parameters need to be stored, the required storage space is reduced by a factor of 1000, enabling the collision avoidance system to operate using current avionics systems.

We propose a general-purpose approach to discovering active learning (AL) strategies from data. These strategies are transferable from one domain to another and can be used in conjunction with many machine learning models. To this end, we formalize the annotation process as a Markov decision process, design universal state and action spaces and introduce a new reward function that precisely model the AL objective of minimizing the annotation cost We seek to find an optimal (non-myopic) AL strategy using reinforcement learning. We evaluate the learned strategies on multiple unrelated domains and show that they consistently outperform state-of-the-art baselines. Modern supervised machine learning (ML) methods require large annotated datasets for training purposes and the cost of producing them can easily become prohibitive. Active learning (AL) mitigates the problem by selecting intelligently and adaptively a subset of the data to be annotated. To do so, AL typically relies on informativeness measures that identify unlabelled datapoints whose labels are most likely to help to improve the performance of the trained model. As a result, good performance is achieved using far fewer annotations than by randomly labelling data. Most AL selection strategies are hand-designed either on the basis of researcher's expertise and intuition or by approximating theoretical criteria (Settles, 2012).

Dropout regularization of deep neural networks has been a mysterious yet effective tool to prevent overfitting. Explanations for its success range from the prevention of "co-adapted" weights to it being a form of cheap Bayesian inference. We propose a novel framework for understanding multiplicative noise in neural networks, considering continuous distributions as well as Bernoulli (i.e. dropout). We show that multiplicative noise induces structured shrinkage priors on a network's weights. We derive the equivalence through reparametrization properties of scale mixtures and not via any approximation. Given the equivalence, we then show that dropout's usual Monte Carlo training objective approximates marginal MAP estimation. We analyze this MAP objective under strong shrinkage, showing the expanded parametrization (i.e. likelihood noise) is more stable than a hierarchical representation. Lastly, we derive analogous priors for ResNets, RNNs, and CNNs and reveal their equivalent implementation as noise.

We formulate stochastic gradient descent (SGD) as a Bayesian filtering problem. Inference in the Bayesian setting naturally gives rise to BRMSprop and BAdam: Bayesian variants of RMSprop and Adam. Remarkably, the Bayesian approach recovers many features of state-of-the-art adaptive SGD methods, including amoungst others root-mean-square normalization, Nesterov acceleration and AdamW. As such, the Bayesian approach provides one explanation for the empirical effectiveness of state-of-the-art adaptive SGD algorithms. Empirically comparing BRMSprop and BAdam with naive RMSprop and Adam on MNIST, we find that Bayesian methods have the potential to considerably reduce test loss and classification error.