Model-assisted interval designs such as the Keyboard design are transparent and easy to implement in phase I oncology trials. However, interim decisions based solely on data from the current dose may overlook informative signals from neighbouring doses, leading to unnecessary escalation or de-escalation. We propose the shared Keyboard design, a Bayesian model-assisted design that replaces the independent beta--binomial updating scheme at each dose with a posterior induced by a Beta kernel process using kernel-weighted pseudo-counts. The design preserves the decision structure of the Keyboard design while enabling controlled borrowing across nearby doses. To prioritise overdose control, we propose an asymmetric kernel that assigns greater weight to toxicities observed at higher doses during escalation. We further extend the proposed design to accommodate adaptive dose insertion when the initial dose grid is inadequate and time-to-event outcomes when late-onset toxicities are present. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate substantial improvements in both accuracy and safety for identifying the maximum tolerated dose. In settings involving dose insertion, the proposed design identifies inserted target doses more effectively than adaptive dose modification while maintaining a comparable modification rate.

Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED) selects experiments to maximize information gain about model parameters. However, in decision-critical settings, reducing parameter uncertainty does not necessarily improve downstream decisions, as only specific parameter directions relevant to the objective truly matter. We propose GoBOED, a goal-driven BOED framework that directly optimizes experimental designs for a specified decision-making objective. GoBOED combines an amortized variational posterior surrogate with a differentiable convex decision layer, enabling gradient-based design optimization that is fully decision-focused. We theoretically show that GoBOED gradients are insensitive to parameter directions irrelevant to the decision objective, providing a formal justification for why goal-driven design achieves equivalent decision quality over a wider set of experimental designs than information-gain maximization. Empirically, across source localization, epidemic management, and pharmacokinetic control, GoBOED identifies designs that better align with downstream decision objectives and reveals that near-optimal design windows are substantially wider than those predicted by goal-agnostic BOED approaches.

Score matching is an alternative to maximum likelihood estimation when the normalizing constant is unknown or too costly to evaluate. However, vanilla score matching has shown to be inefficient relative to maximum likelihood estimation for multimodal distributions with well-separated modes, which are commonly encountered in practical applications. We compare a novel diffusion-based denoising score matching estimator (DDSME) to the vanilla score matching estimator (SME) in this scenario. In particular, we prove statistical guarantees for both estimators, showing that the error bound for the vanilla SME worsens when the separation between the modes increases, which can be avoided in case of the DDSME with suitable hyperparameter tuning. This provides a novel theoretical explanation for the superior behavior of diffusion-based score matching over the vanilla version.

Machine learning methods provide a methodological innovation that can help screen for cardiovascular disease through noninvasive and readily available measurement modalities. Recent investments in using electrocardiogram (ECG) data to screen for structural heart disease (SHD) are one example, where ECGs provide a low-cost, available modality for screening. This has led to the EchoNext dataset, a paired ECG-echocardiogram data repository for testing new methods of SHD detection. However, relatively few studies have investigated how more probabilistic classification through Bayesian inference may improve uncertainty quantification in this setting. Moreover, few studies have considered how triage systems can be developed to alleviate healthcare bottlenecks, such as the review of data from underserved, rural clinics by expert sonographers for SHD assessment. In this study, we leverage existing ECG-echocardiogram data to compare frequentist and Bayesian neural network classifiers. We show that the Bayesian approach is comparable or better than frequentist methods in SHD classification, and that they have a more robust uncertainty quantification attached to them. We provide an example of how this uncertainty-aware classification scheme can be used for screening SHD, providing a proof-of-concept for how machine learning can help with triage in getting individuals expert sonographer input when SHD is highly likely or measurements are highly uncertain.

Large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable mechanism to elicit domain-informed prior information for high-dimensional variable selection. However, existing methods such as LLM-Lasso are sensitive to weight quality, with performance degrading substantially when LLM-generated weights are inaccurate. To address this challenge, we first introduce a framework for quantifying the quality of LLM-generated weights, enabling rigorous evaluation of LLM-informed methods across varying weight regimes. We then propose the LLM Sparsity Prior (LSP), which integrates LLM-generated weights into the prior inclusion probabilities of Spike-and-Slab and Spike-and-Slab Lasso models via two interpretable hyperparameters governing global sparsity and weight concentration. Hierarchical hyperpriors on these parameters allow the model to dynamically discount uninformative or misleading weights, improving robustness without sacrificing gains when weights are accurate. Finally, we develop principled prompt engineering strategies and validate the method on a private medical dataset studying Acute Kidney Injury. LSP improves prediction accuracy and identifies clinically relevant features missed by the baselines, with robustness to prompt variation and particular effectiveness in low-data regimes.

Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) constitute a central modeling tool to enable principled reasoning about cause-effect interactions in complex systems. However, since the causal structure underlying a group of variables is often unknown and interventions may be infeasible or ethically challenging to implement, there is a need to address the task of inferring DAGs from observational data. However, most classical structure identification approaches face two key obstacles: the combinatorial challenge of enforcing acyclicity, which severely limits scalability, and identifiability challenges arising from latent confounding or heterogeneous noise. This tutorial offers an overview of recent signal processing and optimization advances that address these issues by recasting DAG structure learning as a continuous, score-based estimation problem over adjacency matrices. We begin with a didactic introduction to structural equation models and the formulation of causal graph recovery, followed by a historical survey of score-based methods ranging from early combinatorial search schemes and greedy heuristics to modern continuous frameworks that leverage smooth characterizations of acyclicity. Building on this foundation, we describe concomitant DAG estimation methods that jointly infer sparse causal structure and exogenous noise levels, improving robustness under heteroscedasticity and distribution shifts by rendering the estimator noise adaptive. All in all, the tutorial introduces readers to challenges and opportunities for signal processing research at the crossroads of causal inference, high-dimensional statistics, and scalable graph learning, while outlining emerging directions including online, nonlinear, and neural causal discovery.

Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model estimation is a well-established strategy to rank a collection of items given a dataset of pairwise comparisons. Although the theoretical performance of BTL estimation methods, such as spectral and maximum likelihood estimation, is well studied in the regime of uniformly sampled graphs, generalizing such results to a wider class of random graphs has proved challenging. In this work, we investigate the entry-wise error of spectral algorithms against a semi-random adversary that can arbitrarily boost the sampling probabilities of certain edges. We find that the performance of the unweighted spectral method is heavily dependent on the spectral properties of the generated graph. Furthermore, we show that asymptotic performance approaching that of uniformly sampled graphs can be recovered by appropriately reweighting the observed edges to counteract the adversary and restore the spectral gap. Finally, we provide numerical simulations that support our theoretical findings.

The test-negative design (TND) is a resource-efficient observational study design that can assess vaccine effectiveness and exposure-proximal immune correlates of disease. The TND enrolls symptomatic individuals seeking diagnostic testing and compares case status by an exposure variable, such as vaccination status or immune marker level, that is measured at testing. While the TND reduces confounding by healthcare-seeking behavior, other sources of confounding may remain. TND studies may also have missing data in the exposure variable due to incomplete records or two-phase sampling designs. We present a targeted maximum likelihood estimation approach involving a semiparametric logistic regression model that targets a causal conditional risk ratio of symptomatic disease in the healthcare-seeking population. Under causal and missing at random assumptions, our method produces an efficient, asymptotically linear estimator that provides flexible, data-driven confounding control and valid causal inference when analyzing TND studies with missing exposure variable data. We evaluate our method's finite sample properties using plasmode simulations of a two-phase TND immune correlates study. We also apply our method to assess COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and antibody marker correlates of COVID-19 from TND study cohorts derived from the Moderna Coronavirus Efficacy phase 3 trial.

Causal discovery from multivariate time series is challenging when causal effects may occur both across time and within the same sampling interval. This issue is especially important in applications such as neuroscience, where the sampling rate may be coarse relative to the underlying dynamics and contemporaneous effects need not form an acyclic graph. We study causal discovery in linear Gaussian structural VAR models under an equal noise variance assumption, meaning that the structural noise terms have a common variance. Unlike the DAG-based cross-sectional equal noise variance setting, the time-series setting considered here does not generally yield point identification of a unique causal graph. Instead, multiple structural VAR parameterizations can induce the same stationary observed process law. We introduce a notion of observational equivalence tailored to this setting and show that the corresponding equivalence class is characterized by orthogonal transformations of the structural equations together with a global positive scale. This characterization leads to an equivalence-aware model discrepancy, the observational alignment discrepancy, which compares structural models modulo transformations that preserve the observed law. Building on this theory, we propose ENVAR, a sparsity-based procedure that searches over the induced observational equivalence class for a sparse normalized structural representative. We evaluate the proposed methodology on synthetic structural VAR data and on an fMRI dataset.

Symbolic regression with genetic programming (GPSR) may suffer from overfitting and structural bloat, especially when noise is present. In this paper we evaluate description length (DL) and fractional Bayes factor (FBF) criteria as principled, data-efficient alternatives to heuristics for selecting compact expressions that generalise well. We implement DL using a Fisher-information-based parameter encoding and compare it to AIC and BIC across multiple datasets, including noisy synthetic benchmarks and real-world regression problems. We study three search/selection strategies: (i) multi-objective search for accuracy and program length followed by DL/FBF selection; (ii) multi-objective search using DL directly as an objective; and (iii) single-objective optimisation with DL/FBF as the fitness. Across datasets we find that DL/FBF post-selection improves test performance compared to AIC/BIC baseline and that BIC in combination with the same function complexity penalty from DL/FBF produces similar results. In contrast, using DL/FBF directly as a fitness function in single-objective GPSR frequently induces premature convergence to overly simple models. We conclude with practical guidance for using DL/FBF as robust model-selection tools in genetic programming workflows.