Evaluation metrics to analyze the performance of models Industry relevance of linear and logistic regression Mathematics behind KNN, SVM and Naive Bayes algorithms Implementation of KNN, SVM and Naive Bayes using sklearn Attribute selection methods- Gini Index and Entropy Mathematics behind Decision trees and random forest Boosting algorithms:- Adaboost, Gradient Boosting and XgBoost Different Algorithms for Clustering Different methods to deal with imbalanced data Correlation Filtering Content and Collaborative based filtering Singular Value Decomposition Different algorithms used for Time Series forecasting Hands on Real-World examples. To make sense out of this course, you should be well aware of linear algebra, calculus, statistics, probability and python programming language. To make sense out of this course, you should be well aware of linear algebra, calculus, statistics, probability and python programming language. This course is a perfect fit for you. This course will take you step by step into the world of Machine Learning.

We propose a network architecture capable of reliably estimating uncertainty of regression based predictions without sacrificing accuracy. The current state-of-the-art uncertainty algorithms either fall short of achieving prediction accuracy comparable to the mean square error optimization or underestimate the variance of network predictions. We propose a decoupled network architecture that is capable of accomplishing both at the same time. We achieve this by breaking down the learning of prediction and prediction interval (PI) estimations into a two-stage training process. We use a custom loss function for learning a PI range around optimized mean estimation with a desired coverage of a proportion of the target labels within the PI range. We compare the proposed method with current state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification algorithms on synthetic datasets and UCI benchmarks, reducing the error in the predictions by 23 to 34% while maintaining 95% Prediction Interval Coverage Probability (PICP) for 7 out of 9 UCI benchmark datasets. We also examine the quality of our predictive uncertainty by evaluating on Active Learning and demonstrating 17 to 36% error reduction on UCI benchmarks.

The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model is a popular method for creating mixed-membership clusters. Despite having been originally developed for text analysis, LDA has been used for a wide range of other applications. We propose a new formulation for the LDA model which incorporates covariates. In this model, a negative binomial regression is embedded within LDA, enabling straight-forward interpretation of the regression coefficients and the analysis of the quantity of cluster-specific elements in each sampling units (instead of the analysis being focused on modeling the proportion of each cluster, as in Structural Topic Models). We use slice sampling within a Gibbs sampling algorithm to estimate model parameters. We rely on simulations to show how our algorithm is able to successfully retrieve the true parameter values and the ability to make predictions for the abundance matrix using the information given by the covariates. The model is illustrated using real data sets from three different areas: text-mining of Coronavirus articles, analysis of grocery shopping baskets, and ecology of tree species on Barro Colorado Island (Panama). This model allows the identification of mixed-membership clusters in discrete data and provides inference on the relationship between covariates and the abundance of these clusters.

We revisit convergence rates for maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) under finite mixture models. The Wasserstein distance has become a standard loss function for the analysis of parameter estimation in these models, due in part to its ability to circumvent label switching and to accurately characterize the behaviour of fitted mixture components with vanishing weights. However, the Wasserstein metric is only able to capture the worst-case convergence rate among the remaining fitted mixture components. We demonstrate that when the log-likelihood function is penalized to discourage vanishing mixing weights, stronger loss functions can be derived to resolve this shortcoming of the Wasserstein distance. These new loss functions accurately capture the heterogeneity in convergence rates of fitted mixture components, and we use them to sharpen existing pointwise and uniform convergence rates in various classes of mixture models. In particular, these results imply that a subset of the components of the penalized MLE typically converge significantly faster than could have been anticipated from past work. We further show that some of these conclusions extend to the traditional MLE. Our theoretical findings are supported by a simulation study to illustrate these improved convergence rates.

Because its concise and its minimal, it does not include topics like GANs. Reinforcement learning etc. tt also does not cover Bayesian approaches n detail What is the difference between machine learning and deep learning?

Anomaly detection is a widely studied task for a broad variety of data types; among them, multiple time series appear frequently in applications, including for example, power grids and traffic networks. Detecting anomalies for multiple time series, however, is a challenging subject, owing to the intricate interdependencies among the constituent series. We hypothesize that anomalies occur in low density regions of a distribution and explore the use of normalizing flows for unsupervised anomaly detection, because of their superior quality in density estimation. Moreover, we propose a novel flow model by imposing a Bayesian network among constituent series. A Bayesian network is a directed acyclic graph (DAG) that models causal relationships; it factorizes the joint probability of the series into the product of easy-to-evaluate conditional probabilities. We call such a graph-augmented normalizing flow approach GANF and propose joint estimation of the DAG with flow parameters. We conduct extensive experiments on real-world datasets and demonstrate the effectiveness of GANF for density estimation, anomaly detection, and identification of time series distribution drift.

Gene expression datasets consist of thousand of genes with relatively small samplesizes (i.e. are large-$p$-small-$n$). Moreover, dependencies of various orders co-exist in the datasets. In the Undirected probabilistic Graphical Model (UGM) framework the Glasso algorithm has been proposed to deal with high dimensional micro-array datasets forcing sparsity. Also, modifications of the default Glasso algorithm are developed to overcome the problem of complex interaction structure. In this work we advocate the use of a simple score-based Hill Climbing algorithm (HC) that learns Gaussian Bayesian Networks (BNs) leaning on Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). We compare HC with Glasso and its modifications in the UGM framework on their capability to reconstruct GRNs from micro-array data belonging to the Escherichia Coli genome. We benefit from the analytical properties of the Joint Probability Density (JPD) function on which both directed and undirected PGMs build to convert DAGs to UGMs. We conclude that dependencies in complex data are learned best by the HC algorithm, presenting them most accurately and efficiently, simultaneously modelling strong local and weaker but significant global connections coexisting in the gene expression dataset. The HC algorithm adapts intrinsically to the complex dependency structure of the dataset, without forcing a specific structure in advance. On the contrary, Glasso and modifications model unnecessary dependencies at the expense of the probabilistic information in the network and of a structural bias in the JPD function that can only be relieved including many parameters.

In former articles, we have been looking at many different concepts related to Bayesian Networks: how to represent them in a compact manner, their reasoning patterns, and I-Map. In this article, we will take a look at D-separation and try to understand it both intuitively and mathematically.

Though we're living through a time of extraordinary innovation in GPU-accelerated machine learning, the latest research papers frequently (and prominently) feature algorithms that are decades, in certain cases 70 years old. Some might contend that many of these older methods fall into the camp of'statistical analysis' rather than machine learning, and prefer to date the advent of the sector back only so far as 1957, with the invention of the Perceptron. Given the extent to which these older algorithms support and are enmeshed in the latest trends and headline-grabbing developments in machine learning, it's a contestable stance. So let's take a look at some of the'classic' building blocks underpinning the latest innovations, as well as some newer entries that are making an early bid for the AI hall of fame. In 2017 Google Research led a research collaboration culminating in the paper Attention Is All You Need.

Variational inference (VI) is a technique to approximate difficult to compute posteriors by optimization. In contrast to MCMC, VI scales to many observations. In the case of complex posteriors, however, state-of-the-art VI approaches often yield unsatisfactory posterior approximations. This paper presents Bernstein flow variational inference (BF-VI), a robust and easy-to-use method, flexible enough to approximate complex multivariate posteriors. BF-VI combines ideas from normalizing flows and Bernstein polynomial-based transformation models. In benchmark experiments, we compare BF-VI solutions with exact posteriors, MCMC solutions, and state-of-the-art VI methods including normalizing flow based VI. We show for low-dimensional models that BF-VI accurately approximates the true posterior; in higher-dimensional models, BF-VI outperforms other VI methods. Further, we develop with BF-VI a Bayesian model for the semi-structured Melanoma challenge data, combining a CNN model part for image data with an interpretable model part for tabular data, and demonstrate for the first time how the use of VI in semi-structured models.