Machine learning is the study of computer algorithms that can automatically improve based on data and experience. Machine learning algorithms build a model from sample data, called training data, to make predictions or judgments without being explicitly programmed to do so. A variety of wellknown machine learning algorithms have been developed for use in the field of computer science to analyze data. This paper introduced a new machine learning algorithm called impact learning. Impact learning is a supervised learning algorithm that can be consolidated in both classification and regression problems. It can furthermore manifest its superiority in analyzing competitive data. This algorithm is remarkable for learning from the competitive situation and the competition comes from the effects of autonomous features. It is prepared by the impacts of the highlights from the intrinsic rate of natural increase (RNI). We, moreover, manifest the prevalence of the impact learning over the conventional machine learning algorithm.

With the increasing growth of information through smart devices, increasing the quality level of human life requires various computational paradigms presentation including the Internet of Things, fog, and cloud. Between these three paradigms, the cloud computing paradigm as an emerging technology adds cloud layer services to the edge of the network so that resource allocation operations occur close to the end-user to reduce resource processing time and network traffic overhead. Hence, the resource allocation problem for its providers in terms of presenting a suitable platform, by using computational paradigms is considered a challenge. In general, resource allocation approaches are divided into two methods, including auction-based methods(goal, increase profits for service providers-increase user satisfaction and usability) and optimization-based methods(energy, cost, network exploitation, Runtime, reduction of time delay). In this paper, according to the latest scientific achievements, a comprehensive literature study (CLS) on artificial intelligence methods based on resource allocation optimization without considering auction-based methods in various computing environments are provided such as cloud computing, Vehicular Fog Computing, wireless, IoT, vehicular networks, 5G networks, vehicular cloud architecture,machine-to-machine communication(M2M),Train-to-Train(T2T) communication network, Peer-to-Peer(P2P) network. Since deep learning methods based on artificial intelligence are used as the most important methods in resource allocation problems; Therefore, in this paper, resource allocation approaches based on deep learning are also used in the mentioned computational environments such as deep reinforcement learning, Q-learning technique, reinforcement learning, online learning, and also Classical learning methods such as Bayesian learning, Cummins clustering, Markov decision process.

Standard causal inference characterizes treatment effect through averages, but the counterfactual distributions could be different in not only the central tendency but also spread and shape. To provide a comprehensive evaluation of treatment effects, we focus on estimating quantile treatment effects (QTEs). Existing methods that invert a nonsmooth estimator of the cumulative distribution functions forbid inference on probability density functions (PDFs), but PDFs can reveal more nuanced characteristics of the counterfactual distributions. We adopt a semiparametric conditional distribution regression model that allows inference on any functionals of counterfactual distributions, including PDFs and multiple QTEs. To account for the observational nature of the data and ensure an efficient model, we adjust for a double balancing score that augments the propensity score with individual covariates. We provide a Bayesian estimation framework that appropriately propagates modeling uncertainty. We show via simulations that the use of double balancing score for confounding adjustment improves performance over adjusting for any single score alone, and the proposed semiparametric model estimates QTEs more accurately than other semiparametric methods. We apply the proposed method to the North Carolina birth weight dataset to analyze the effect of maternal smoking on infant's birth weight.

Rule-based classification models described in the language of logic directly predict boolean values, rather than modeling a probability and translating it into a prediction as done in statistical models. The vast majority of existing uncertainty quantification approaches rely on models providing continuous output not available to rule-based models. In this work, we propose an uncertainty quantification framework in the form of a meta-model that takes any binary classifier with binary output as a black box and estimates the prediction accuracy of that base model at a given input along with a level of confidence on that estimation. The confidence is based on how well that input region is explored and is designed to work in any OOD scenario. We demonstrate the usefulness of this uncertainty model by building an abstaining classifier powered by it and observing its performance in various scenarios.

Unlearn.AI, Inc., 75 Hawthorne St. Ste 560, San Francisco, CA 94105 (Dated: November 7, 2022) Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) are probabilistic generative models that can be trained by maximum likelihood in principle, but are usually trained by an approximate algorithm called Contrastive Divergence (CD) in practice. In general, a CD-k algorithm estimates an average with respect to the model distribution using a sample obtained from a k-step Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithm (e.g., block Gibbs sampling) starting from some initial configuration. Choices of k typically vary from 1 to 100. This technical report explores if it's possible to leverage a simple approximate sampling algorithm with a modified version of CD in order to train an RBM with k=0. As usual, the method is illustrated on MNIST.

Deep learning models for semantic segmentation are prone to poor performance in real-world applications due to the highly challenging nature of the task. Model uncertainty quantification (UQ) is one way to address this issue of lack of model trustworthiness by enabling the practitioner to know how much to trust a segmentation output. Current UQ methods in this application domain are mainly restricted to Bayesian based methods which are computationally expensive and are only able to extract central moments of uncertainty thereby limiting the quality of their uncertainty estimates. We present a simple framework for high-resolution predictive uncertainty quantification of semantic segmentation models that leverages a multi-moment functional definition of uncertainty associated with the model's feature space in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The multiple uncertainty functionals extracted from this framework are defined by the local density dynamics of the model's feature space and hence automatically align themselves at the tail-regions of the intrinsic probability density function of the feature space (where uncertainty is the highest) in such a way that the successively higher order moments quantify the more uncertain regions. This leads to a significantly more accurate view of model uncertainty than conventional Bayesian methods. Moreover, the extraction of such moments is done in a single-shot computation making it much faster than Bayesian and ensemble approaches (that involve a high number of forward stochastic passes of the model to quantify its uncertainty). We demonstrate these advantages through experimental evaluations of our framework implemented over four different state-of-the-art model architectures that are trained and evaluated on two benchmark road-scene segmentation datasets (Camvid and Cityscapes).

Training energy-based models (EBMs) with noise-contrastive estimation (NCE) is theoretically feasible but practically challenging. Effective learning requires the noise distribution to be approximately similar to the target distribution, especially in high-dimensional domains. Previous works have explored modelling the noise distribution as a separate generative model, and then concurrently training this noise model with the EBM. While this method allows for more effective noise-contrastive estimation, it comes at the cost of extra memory and training complexity. Instead, this thesis proposes a self-adapting NCE algorithm which uses static instances of the EBM along its training trajectory as the noise distribution. During training, these static instances progressively converge to the target distribution, thereby circumventing the need to simultaneously train an auxiliary noise model. Moreover, we express this self-adapting NCE algorithm in the framework of Bregman divergences and show that it is a generalization of maximum likelihood learning for EBMs. The performance of our algorithm is evaluated across a range of noise update intervals, and experimental results show that shorter update intervals are conducive to higher synthesis quality.

The joint optimization of the reconstruction and classification error is a hard non convex problem, especially when a non linear mapping is utilized. In order to overcome this obstacle, a novel optimization strategy is proposed, in which a Convolutional Autoencoder for dimensionality reduction and a classifier composed by a Fully Connected Network, are combined to simultaneously produce supervised dimensionality reduction and predictions. It turned out that this methodology can also be greatly beneficial in enforcing explainability of deep learning architectures. Additionally, the resulting Latent Space, optimized for the classification task, can be utilized to improve traditional, interpretable classification algorithms. The experimental results, showed that the proposed methodology achieved competitive results against the state of the art deep learning methods, while being much more efficient in terms of parameter count. Finally, it was empirically justified that the proposed methodology introduces advanced explainability regarding, not only the data structure through the produced latent space, but also about the classification behaviour.

The rise of big data analytics has automated the decision-making of companies and increased supply chain agility. In this paper, we study the supply chain contract design problem faced by a data-driven supplier who needs to respond to the inventory decisions of the downstream retailer. Both the supplier and the retailer are uncertain about the market demand and need to learn about it sequentially. The goal for the supplier is to develop data-driven pricing policies with sublinear regret bounds under a wide range of possible retailer inventory policies for a fixed time horizon. To capture the dynamics induced by the retailer's learning policy, we first make a connection to non-stationary online learning by following the notion of variation budget. The variation budget quantifies the impact of the retailer's learning strategy on the supplier's decision-making. We then propose dynamic pricing policies for the supplier for both discrete and continuous demand. We also note that our proposed pricing policy only requires access to the support of the demand distribution, but critically, does not require the supplier to have any prior knowledge about the retailer's learning policy or the demand realizations. We examine several well-known data-driven policies for the retailer, including sample average approximation, distributionally robust optimization, and parametric approaches, and show that our pricing policies lead to sublinear regret bounds in all these cases. At the managerial level, we answer affirmatively that there is a pricing policy with a sublinear regret bound under a wide range of retailer's learning policies, even though she faces a learning retailer and an unknown demand distribution. Our work also provides a novel perspective in data-driven operations management where the principal has to learn to react to the learning policies employed by other agents in the system.

The propensity score is defined as the conditional probability of being assigned to a treatment (exposure) given one's observed confounding variables. It is very commonly used in methods for estimating causal effects from observational data, such as inverse probability weighting [1], propensity matching [2, 3], propensity stratification [4], as well as many doubly-robust methods [5, 6, 7, 8] Rosenbaum and Rubin [2] set up theoretical guaranties ensuring that adjusting for the propensity score, instead of the covariates themselves, is sufficient in order to achieve the conditional exchangeability needed to estimate a causal effect. However, while these theoretical guarantees require the true conditional probabilities, when applied in practice, not every model that inputs data and outputs a number between zero and one, correctly estimates true probabilities. The scores might not reliably represent true probabilities. A prediction model that accurately outputs probabilities is referred to as calibrated (note this is unrelated to a previous notion of "propensity score calibration" from [9]). Calibration can be empirically evaluated with calibration curve (reliability curves), comparing the predicted scores with their corresponding rate of labels [10].