This idea was further extended in (Xie et al., 2017), where Symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrices are widely used sub-manifold learning for dimension reduction is used before data structures in many disciplines, e.g. in medical imaging the tangent space approximation. However, the first-order approximations (Penne et al., 2006) and computer vision as covariance region can lead to undesirable distortion, especially in descriptors (Tuzel et al., 2006; Jayasumana et al., 2015), regions far from the tangent space origin (Tuzel et al., 2008; as well as in brain-computer interface (BCI) (Congedo et al., Jayasumana et al., 2015). The mean of the SPD matrices is a 2017), etc. Endowed with an appropriate metric, SPD matrices frequently used candidate for the tangent space origin, however, form a curved Riemannian manifold. Consequently, many popular no theoretical proof exists to guarantee the mean yields the best machine learning algorithms such as linear discriminant tangent space approximation for the data (Tuzel et al., 2008).

The evolution of social media platforms have empowered everyone to access information easily. Social media users can easily share information with the rest of the world. This may sometimes encourage spread of fake news, which can result in undesirable consequences. In this work, we train models which can identify health news related to COVID-19 pandemic as real or fake. Our models achieve a high F1-score of 98.64%. Our models achieve second place on the leaderboard, tailing the first position with a very narrow margin 0.05% points.

Naïve Bayes is a classification technique that serves as the basis for implementing several classifier modeling algorithms. Naïve Bayes-based classifiers are considered some of the simplest, fastest, and easiest-to-use machine learning techniques, yet are still effective for real-world applications. Naïve Bayes is based on Bayes' theorem, formulated by 18th-century statistician Thomas Bayes. This theorem assesses the probability that an event will occur based on conditions related to the event. For example, an individual with Parkinson's disease typically has voice variations; hence such symptoms are considered related to the prediction of a Parkinson's diagnosis.

In many cases, it is difficult to generate highly accurate models for time series data using a known parametric model structure. In response, an increasing body of research focuses on using neural networks to model time series approximately. A common assumption in training neural networks on time series is that the errors at different time steps are uncorrelated. However, due to the temporality of the data, errors are actually autocorrelated in many cases, which makes such maximum likelihood estimation inaccurate. In this paper, we propose to learn the autocorrelation coefficient jointly with the model parameters in order to adjust for autocorrelated errors. For time series regression, large-scale experiments indicate that our method outperforms the Prais-Winsten method, especially when the autocorrelation is strong. Furthermore, we broaden our method to time series forecasting and apply it with various state-of-the-art models. Results across a wide range of real-world datasets show that our method enhances performance in almost all cases.

The growing energy and performance costs of deep learning have driven the community to reduce the size of neural networks by selectively pruning components. Similarly to their biological counterparts, sparse networks generalize just as well, if not better than, the original dense networks. Sparsity can reduce the memory footprint of regular networks to fit mobile devices, as well as shorten training time for ever growing networks. In this paper, we survey prior work on sparsity in deep learning and provide an extensive tutorial of sparsification for both inference and training. We describe approaches to remove and add elements of neural networks, different training strategies to achieve model sparsity, and mechanisms to exploit sparsity in practice. Our work distills ideas from more than 300 research papers and provides guidance to practitioners who wish to utilize sparsity today, as well as to researchers whose goal is to push the frontier forward. We include the necessary background on mathematical methods in sparsification, describe phenomena such as early structure adaptation, the intricate relations between sparsity and the training process, and show techniques for achieving acceleration on real hardware. We also define a metric of pruned parameter efficiency that could serve as a baseline for comparison of different sparse networks. We close by speculating on how sparsity can improve future workloads and outline major open problems in the field.

The use of Deep Learning hardware algorithms for embedded applications is characterized by challenges such as constraints on device power consumption, availability of labeled data, and limited internet bandwidth for frequent training on cloud servers. To enable low power implementations, we consider efficient bitwidth reduction and pruning for the class of Deep Learning algorithms known as Discriminative Deep Belief Networks (DDBNs) for embedded-device classification tasks. We train DDBNs with both generative and discriminative objectives under an approximate computing framework and analyze their power-at-performance for supervised and semi-supervised applications. We also investigate the out-of-distribution performance of DDBNs when the inference data has the same class structure yet is statistically different from the training data owing to dynamic real-time operating environments. Based on our analysis, we provide novel insights and recommendations for choice of training objectives, bitwidth values, and accuracy sensitivity with respect to the amount of labeled data for implementing DDBN inference with minimum power consumption on embedded hardware platforms subject to accuracy tolerances.

Bayesian Networks (BNs) have become a powerful technology for reasoning under uncertainty, particularly in areas that require causal assumptions that enable us to simulate the effect of intervention. The graphical structure of these models can be determined by causal knowledge, learnt from data, or a combination of both. While it seems plausible that the best approach in constructing a causal graph involves combining knowledge with machine learning, this approach remains underused in practice. This paper describes and evaluates a set of information fusion methods that have been implemented in the open-source Bayesys structure learning system. The methods enable users to specify pre-existing knowledge and rule-based information that can be obtained from heterogeneous sources, to constrain or guide structure learning. Each method is assessed in terms of structure learning impact, including graphical accuracy, model fitting, complexity and runtime. The results are illustrated both with limited and big data, with application to three BN structure learning algorithms available in Bayesys, and reveal interesting inconsistencies about their effectiveness where the results obtained from graphical measures often contradict those obtained from model fitting measures. While the overall results show that information fusion methods become less effective with big data due to higher learning accuracy rendering knowledge less important, some information fusion methods do perform better with big data. Lastly, amongst the main conclusions is the observation that reduced search space obtained from knowledge constraints does not imply reduced computational complexity, which can happen when the constraints set up a tension between what the data indicate and what the constraints are trying to enforce.

Sparse principal component analysis (PCA) is a popular tool for dimensional reduction of high-dimensional data. Despite its massive popularity, there is still a lack of theoretically justifiable Bayesian sparse PCA that is computationally scalable. A major challenge is choosing a suitable prior for the loadings matrix, as principal components are mutually orthogonal. We propose a spike and slab prior that meets this orthogonality constraint and show that the posterior enjoys both theoretical and computational advantages. Two computational algorithms, the PX-CAVI and the PX-EM algorithms, are developed. Both algorithms use parameter expansion to deal with the orthogonality constraint and to accelerate their convergence speeds. We found that the PX-CAVI algorithm has superior empirical performance than the PX-EM algorithm and two other penalty methods for sparse PCA. The PX-CAVI algorithm is then applied to study a lung cancer gene expression dataset. $\mathsf{R}$ package $\mathsf{VBsparsePCA}$ with an implementation of the algorithm is available on The Comprehensive R Archive Network.

A Machine Learning interview calls for a rigorous interview process where the candidates are judged on various aspects such as technical and programming skills, knowledge of methods and clarity of basic concepts. If you aspire to apply for machine learning jobs, it is crucial to know what kind of interview questions generally recruiters and hiring managers may ask. This is an attempt to help you crack the machine learning interviews at major product based companies and start-ups. Usually, machine learning interviews at major companies require a thorough knowledge of data structures and algorithms. In the upcoming series of articles, we shall start from the basics of concepts and build upon these concepts to solve major interview questions. Machine learning interviews comprise of many rounds, which begin with a screening test. This comprises solving questions either on the white-board, or solving it on online platforms like HackerRank, LeetCode etc. Here, we have compiled a list of ...

We consider the question of sequential prediction under the log-loss in terms of cumulative regret. Namely, given a hypothesis class of distributions, learner sequentially predicts the (distribution of the) next letter in sequence and its performance is compared to the baseline of the best constant predictor from the hypothesis class. The well-specified case corresponds to an additional assumption that the data-generating distribution belongs to the hypothesis class as well. Here we present results in the more general misspecified case. Due to special properties of the log-loss, the same problem arises in the context of competitive-optimality in density estimation, and model selection. For the $d$-dimensional Gaussian location hypothesis class, we show that cumulative regrets in the well-specified and misspecified cases asymptotically coincide. In other words, we provide an $o(1)$ characterization of the distribution-free (or PAC) regret in this case -- the first such result as far as we know. We recall that the worst-case (or individual-sequence) regret in this case is larger by an additive constant ${d\over 2} + o(1)$. Surprisingly, neither the traditional Bayesian estimators, nor the Shtarkov's normalized maximum likelihood achieve the PAC regret and our estimator requires special "robustification" against heavy-tailed data. In addition, we show two general results for misspecified regret: the existence and uniqueness of the optimal estimator, and the bound sandwiching the misspecified regret between well-specified regrets with (asymptotically) close hypotheses classes.