Causal analysis and classification of injury severity applying non-parametric methods for traffic crashes has received limited attention. This study presents a methodological framework for causal inference, using Granger causality analysis, and injury severity classification of traffic crashes, occurring on interstates, with different machine learning techniques including decision trees (DT), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and deep neural network (DNN). The data used in this study were obtained for traffic crashes on all interstates across the state of Texas from a period of six years between 2014 and 2019. The output of the proposed severity classification approach includes three classes for fatal and severe injury (KA) crashes, non-severe and possible injury (BC) crashes, and property damage only (PDO) crashes. While Granger Causality helped identify the most influential factors affecting crash severity, the learning-based models predicted the severity classes with varying performance. The results of Granger causality analysis identified the speed limit, surface and weather conditions, traffic volume, presence of workzones, workers in workzones, and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, among others, as the most important factors affecting crash severity. The prediction performance of the classifiers yielded varying results across the different classes. Specifically, while decision tree and random forest classifiers provided the greatest performance for PDO and BC severities, respectively, for the KA class, the rarest class in the data, deep neural net classifier performed superior than all other algorithms, most likely due to its capability of approximating nonlinear models. This study contributes to the limited body of knowledge pertaining to causal analysis and classification prediction of traffic crash injury severity using non-parametric approaches.

Power curves capture the relationship between wind speed and output power for a specific wind turbine. Accurate regression models of this function prove useful in monitoring, maintenance, design, and planning. In practice, however, the measurements do not always correspond to the ideal curve: power curtailments will appear as (additional) functional components. Such multivalued relationships cannot be modelled by conventional regression, and the associated data are usually removed during pre-processing. The current work suggests an alternative method to infer multivalued relationships in curtailed power data. Using a population-based approach, an overlapping mixture of probabilistic regression models is applied to signals recorded from turbines within an operational wind farm. The model is shown to provide an accurate representation of practical power data across the population.

We propose a new approach to explain Bayesian Networks. The approach revolves around a new definition of a probabilistic argument and the evidence it provides. We define a notion of independent arguments, and propose an algorithm to extract a list of relevant, independent arguments given a Bayesian Network, a target node and a set of observations. To demonstrate the relevance of the arguments, we show how we can use the extracted arguments to approximate message passing. Finally, we show a simple scheme to explain the arguments in natural language.

Traditional statistical estimation, or statistical inference in general, is static, in the sense that the estimate of the quantity of interest does not change the future evolution of the quantity. In some sequential estimation problems however, we encounter the situation where the future values of the quantity to be estimated depend on the estimate of its current value. Examples include stock price prediction by big investors, interactive product recommendation, and behavior prediction in multi-agent systems. We may call such problems as dynamic inference. In this work, a formulation of this problem under a Bayesian probabilistic framework is given, and the optimal estimation strategy is derived as the solution to minimize the overall inference loss. How the optimal estimation strategy works is illustrated through two examples, stock trend prediction and vehicle behavior prediction. When the underlying models for dynamic inference are unknown, we can consider the problem of learning for dynamic inference. This learning problem can potentially unify several familiar machine learning problems, including supervised learning, imitation learning, and reinforcement learning.

We study the problem of causal structure learning with no assumptions on the functional relationships and noise. We develop DAG-FOCI, a computationally fast algorithm for this setting that is based on the FOCI variable selection algorithm in \cite{azadkia2019simple}. DAG-FOCI requires no tuning parameter and outputs the parents and the Markov boundary of a response variable of interest. We provide high-dimensional guarantees of our procedure when the underlying graph is a polytree. Furthermore, we demonstrate the applicability of DAG-FOCI on real data from computational biology \cite{sachs2005causal} and illustrate the robustness of our methods to violations of assumptions.

The Bayesian brain hypothesis postulates that the brain accurately operates on statistical distributions according to Bayes' theorem. The random failure of presynaptic vesicles to release neurotransmitters may allow the brain to sample from posterior distributions of network parameters, interpreted as epistemic uncertainty. It has not been shown previously how random failures might allow networks to sample from observed distributions, also known as aleatoric or residual uncertainty. Sampling from both distributions enables probabilistic inference, efficient search, and creative or generative problem solving. We demonstrate that under a population-code based interpretation of neural activity, both types of distribution can be represented and sampled with synaptic failure alone. We first define a biologically constrained neural network and sampling scheme based on synaptic failure and lateral inhibition. Within this framework, we derive dropout based epistemic uncertainty, then prove an analytic mapping from synaptic efficacy to release probability that allows networks to sample from arbitrary, learned distributions represented by a receiving layer. Second, our result leads to a local learning rule by which synapses adapt their release probabilities. Our result demonstrates complete Bayesian inference, related to the variational learning method of dropout, in a biologically constrained network using only locally-learned synaptic failure rates. Introduction The Bayesian Brain hypothesis has led to a number of important insights about neural coding in the brain (Knill and Pouget, 2004; Friston, 2010, 2012; Pouget et al., 2013; Lee and Mumford, 2003) by characterizing neural representation and processing in terms of formal probabilistic inference and sampling. Furthermore, the introduction of related probabilistic representations and sampling processes in modern deep learning variational models has led to improved performance on a range of different tasks (Zhang et al., 2019; Blei et al., 2017; Kingma and Welling, 2014; Detorakis et al., 2019). The widely-used dropout technique in deep learning can be seen as a form of variational inference and sampling (Srivastava et al., 2014; Gal and Ghahramani, 2016) with direct analogy to the random failure of synapses in the brain. This link has led to biologically-motivated models of variational deep learning that use network weight dropout to simulate synaptic failure (Mostafa and Cauwenberghs, 2018; Wan et al., 2013; Neftci et al., 2016). In this paper, we build on these and other recent findings in machine learning and neurobiology to show how the brain can accurately represent the two primary components of probabilistic inference, distributions of observed data and distributions of unobserved values (such as model parameters), with the single, biologically established mechanism of synaptic failure.

View Vinayak Chaturvedi’s profile on LinkedIn, the world’s largest professional community. Vinayak has 2 jobs listed on their profile. See the complete profile on LinkedIn and discover Vinayak’s connections and jobs at similar companies.

In recent years, large-scale Bayesian learning draws a great deal of attention. However, in big-data era, the amount of data we face is growing much faster than our ability to deal with it. Fortunately, it is observed that large-scale datasets usually own rich internal structure and is somewhat redundant. In this paper, we attempt to simplify the Bayesian posterior via exploiting this structure. Specifically, we restrict our interest to the so-called well-clustered datasets and construct an \emph{approximate posterior} according to the clustering information. Fortunately, the clustering structure can be efficiently obtained via a particular clustering algorithm. When constructing the approximate posterior, the data points in the same cluster are all replaced by the centroid of the cluster. As a result, the posterior can be significantly simplified. Theoretically, we show that under certain conditions the approximate posterior we construct is close (measured by KL divergence) to the exact posterior. Furthermore, thorough experiments are conducted to validate the fact that the constructed posterior is a good approximation to the true posterior and much easier to sample from.

Hierarchical models with gamma hyperpriors provide a flexible, sparse-promoting framework to bridge $L^1$ and $L^2$ regularizations in Bayesian formulations to inverse problems. Despite the Bayesian motivation for these models, existing methodologies are limited to \textit{maximum a posteriori} estimation. The potential to perform uncertainty quantification has not yet been realized. This paper introduces a variational iterative alternating scheme for hierarchical inverse problems with gamma hyperpriors. The proposed variational inference approach yields accurate reconstruction, provides meaningful uncertainty quantification, and is easy to implement. In addition, it lends itself naturally to conduct model selection for the choice of hyperparameters. We illustrate the performance of our methodology in several computed examples, including a deconvolution problem and sparse identification of dynamical systems from time series data.

Inspired by the foundational works by Spivak and Fong and Cruttwell et al., we introduce a categorical framework to formalize Bayesian inference and learning. The two key ideas at play here are the notions of Bayesian inversions and the functor GL as constructed by Cruttwell et al.. In this context, we find that Bayesian learning is the simplest case of the learning paradigm. We then obtain categorical formulations of batch and sequential Bayes updates while also verifying that the two coincide in a specific example.