Decision Tree Learning
Build a decision tree in SAS
Decision trees are a fundamental machine learning technique that every data scientist should know. Luckily, the construction and implementation of decision trees in SAS is straightforward and easy to produce. The data that we will use for this example is found in the fantastic UCI Machine Learning Repository. The data set is titled "Bank Marketing Dataset," and it can be found at: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Bank This data set represents a direct marketing campaign (phone calls) conducted by a Portuguese banking institution.
Learning Attribute-Based and Relationship-Based Access Control Policies with Unknown Values
Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) and Relationship-based access control (ReBAC) provide a high level of expressiveness and flexibility that promote security and information sharing, by allowing policies to be expressed in terms of attributes of and chains of relationships between entities. Algorithms for learning ABAC and ReBAC policies from legacy access control information have the potential to significantly reduce the cost of migration to ABAC or ReBAC. This paper presents the first algorithms for mining ABAC and ReBAC policies from access control lists (ACLs) and incomplete information about entities, where the values of some attributes of some entities are unknown. We show that the core of this problem can be viewed as learning a concise three-valued logic formula from a set of labeled feature vectors containing unknowns, and we give the first algorithm (to the best of our knowledge) for that problem.
A Performance-Explainability Framework to Benchmark Machine Learning Methods: Application to Multivariate Time Series Classifiers
Fauvel, Kevin, Masson, Véronique, Fromont, Élisa
In order to match these requirements and conduct experiments to validate the usefulness of the explanations Our research aims to propose a new performanceexplainability by the end-users, there is a need to have a comprehensive analytical framework to assess and assessment of the explainability of the existing methods.
Rectified Decision Trees: Exploring the Landscape of Interpretable and Effective Machine Learning
Li, Yiming, Bai, Jiawang, Li, Jiawei, Yang, Xue, Jiang, Yong, Xia, Shu-Tao
Interpretability and effectiveness are two essential and indispensable requirements for adopting machine learning methods in reality. In this paper, we propose a knowledge distillation based decision trees extension, dubbed rectified decision trees (ReDT), to explore the possibility of fulfilling those requirements simultaneously. Specifically, we extend the splitting criteria and the ending condition of the standard decision trees, which allows training with soft labels while preserving the deterministic splitting paths. We then train the ReDT based on the soft label distilled from a well-trained teacher model through a novel jackknife-based method. Accordingly, ReDT preserves the excellent interpretable nature of the decision trees while having a relatively good performance. The effectiveness of adopting soft labels instead of hard ones is also analyzed empirically and theoretically. Surprisingly, experiments indicate that the introduction of soft labels also reduces the model size compared with the standard decision trees from the aspect of the total nodes and rules, which is an unexpected gift from the `dark knowledge' distilled from the teacher model.
Robust Similarity and Distance Learning via Decision Forests
Tomita, Tyler M., Vogelstein, Joshua T.
Canonical distances such as Euclidean distance often fail to capture the appropriate relationships between items, subsequently leading to subpar inference and prediction. Many algorithms have been proposed for automated learning of suitable distances, most of which employ linear methods to learn a global metric over the feature space. While such methods offer nice theoretical properties, interpretability, and computationally efficient means for implementing them, they are limited in expressive capacity. Methods which have been designed to improve expressiveness sacrifice one or more of the nice properties of the linear methods. To bridge this gap, we propose a highly expressive novel decision forest algorithm for the task of distance learning, which we call Similarity and Metric Random Forests (SMERF). We show that the tree construction procedure in SMERF is a proper generalization of standard classification and regression trees. Thus, the mathematical driving forces of SMERF are examined via its direct connection to regression forests, for which theory has been developed. Its ability to approximate arbitrary distances and identify important features is empirically demonstrated on simulated data sets. Last, we demonstrate that it accurately predicts links in networks.
📱Adversarial Attacks on SMS Spam Detectors
Note: The methodology behind the approach discussed in this post stems from a collaborative publication between myself and Irene Anthi. Spam SMS text messages often show up unexpectedly on our phone screens. That's aggravating enough, but it gets worse. Whoever is sending you a spam text message is usually trying to defraud you. Most spam text messages don't come from another phone.
The Aha! Moments In 4 Popular Machine Learning Algorithms
Each step, the Decision Tree algorithm attempts to find a method to build the tree such that the entropy is minimized. Think of entropy more formally as the amount of'disorder' or'confusion' a certain divider (the conditions) has, and its opposite as'information gain' -- how much a divider adds information and insight to the model. Feature splits that have the highest information gain (as well as a lowest entropy) are placed at the top. Note that condition 1 has clean separation, and therefore low entropy and high information gain. The same cannot be said for condition 3, which is why it is placed near the bottom of the Decision Tree.
Rethinking Default Values: a Low Cost and Efficient Strategy to Define Hyperparameters
Mantovani, Rafael Gomes, Rossi, André Luis Debiaso, Alcobaça, Edesio, Gertrudes, Jadson Castro, Junior, Sylvio Barbon, de Carvalho, André Carlos Ponce de Leon Ferreira
Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been successfully employed by a vast range of practitioners with different backgrounds. One of the reasons for ML popularity is the capability to consistently delivers accurate results, which can be further boosted by adjusting hyperparameters (HP). However, part of practitioners has limited knowledge about the algorithms and does not take advantage of suitable HP settings. In general, HP values are defined by trial and error, tuning, or by using default values. Trial and error is very subjective, time costly and dependent on the user experience. Tuning techniques search for HP values able to maximize the predictive performance of induced models for a given dataset, but with the drawback of a high computational cost and target specificity. To avoid tuning costs, practitioners use default values suggested by the algorithm developer or by tools implementing the algorithm. Although default values usually result in models with acceptable predictive performance, different implementations of the same algorithm can suggest distinct default values. To maintain a balance between tuning and using default values, we propose a strategy to generate new optimized default values. Our approach is grounded on a small set of optimized values able to obtain predictive performance values better than default settings provided by popular tools. The HP candidates are estimated through a pool of promising values tuned from a small and informative set of datasets. After performing a large experiment and a careful analysis of the results, we concluded that our approach delivers better default values. Besides, it leads to competitive solutions when compared with the use of tuned values, being easier to use and having a lower cost.Based on our results, we also extracted simple rules to guide practitioners in deciding whether using our new methodology or a tuning approach.
Score-Based Explanations in Data Management and Machine Learning
We describe some approaches to explanations for observed outcomes in data management and machine learning. They are based on the assignment of numerical scores to predefined and potentially relevant inputs. More specifically, we consider explanations for query answers in databases, and for results from classification models. The described approaches are mostly of a causal and counterfactual nature. We argue for the need to bring domain and semantic knowledge into score computations; and suggest some ways to do this.
Feature Selection Methods for Cost-Constrained Classification in Random Forests
Jagdhuber, Rudolf, Lang, Michel, Rahnenführer, Jörg
Cost-sensitive feature selection describes a feature selection problem, where features raise individual costs for inclusion in a model. These costs allow to incorporate disfavored aspects of features, e.g. failure rates of as measuring device, or patient harm, in the model selection process. Random Forests define a particularly challenging problem for feature selection, as features are generally entangled in an ensemble of multiple trees, which makes a post hoc removal of features infeasible. Feature selection methods therefore often either focus on simple pre-filtering methods, or require many Random Forest evaluations along their optimization path, which drastically increases the computational complexity. To solve both issues, we propose Shallow Tree Selection, a novel fast and multivariate feature selection method that selects features from small tree structures. Additionally, we also adapt three standard feature selection algorithms for cost-sensitive learning by introducing a hyperparameter-controlled benefit-cost ratio criterion (BCR) for each method. In an extensive simulation study, we assess this criterion, and compare the proposed methods to multiple performance-based baseline alternatives on four artificial data settings and seven real-world data settings. We show that all methods using a hyperparameterized BCR criterion outperform the baseline alternatives. In a direct comparison between the proposed methods, each method indicates strengths in certain settings, but no one-fits-all solution exists. On a global average, we could identify preferable choices among our BCR based methods. Nevertheless, we conclude that a practical analysis should never rely on a single method only, but always compare different approaches to obtain the best results.