Novel technologies in automated machine learning ease the complexity of algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization. Hyperparameters are important for machine learning models as they significantly influence the performance of machine learning models. Many optimization techniques have achieved notable success in hyperparameter tuning and surpassed the performance of human experts. However, depending on such techniques as blackbox algorithms can leave machine learning practitioners without insight into the relative importance of different hyperparameters. In this paper, we consider building the relationship between the performance of the machine learning models and their hyperparameters to discover the trend and gain insights, with empirical results based on six classifiers and 200 datasets. Our results enable users to decide whether it is worth conducting a possibly time-consuming tuning strategy, to focus on the most important hyperparameters, and to choose adequate hyperparameter spaces for tuning. The results of our experiments show that gradient boosting and Adaboost outperform other classifiers across 200 problems. However, they need tuning to boost their performance. Overall, the results obtained from this study provide a quantitative basis to focus efforts toward guided automated hyperparameter optimization and contribute toward the development of better-automated machine learning frameworks.

Till now we have learned about linear regression, logistic regression, and they were pretty hard to understand. Let's now start with Decision tree's and I assure you this is probably the easiest algorithm in Machine Learning. There's not much mathematics involved here. Since it is very easy to use and interpret it is one of the most widely used and practical methods used in Machine Learning. Root Nodes – It is the node present at the beginning of a decision tree from this node the population starts dividing according to various features.

Rest is essential for a high-level physiological and psychological performance. It is also necessary for the muscles to repair, rebuild, and strengthen. There is a significant correlation between the quality of rest and the resting posture. Therefore, identification of the resting position is of paramount importance to maintain a healthy life. Resting postures can be classified into four basic categories: Lying on the back (supine), facing of the left / right sides and free-fall position. The later position is already considered to be an unhealthy posture by researchers equivocally and hence can be eliminated. In this paper, we analyzed the other three states of resting position based on the data collected from the physiological parameters: Electrogastrogram (EGG), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Respiration Rate, Heart Rate, and Oxygen Saturation (SpO2). Based on these parameters, the resting position is classified using a hybrid stacked ensemble machine learning model designed using the Decision tree, Random Forest, and Xgboost algorithms. Our study demonstrates a 100% accurate prediction of the resting position using the hybrid model. The proposed method of identifying the resting position based on physiological parameters has the potential to be integrated into wearable devices. This is a low cost, highly accurate and autonomous technique to monitor the body posture while maintaining the user privacy by eliminating the use of RGB camera conventionally used to conduct the polysomnography (sleep Monitoring) or resting position studies.

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) is used in more applications, the need to consider and mitigate biases from the learned models has followed. Most works in developing fair learning algorithms focus on the offline setting. However, in many real-world applications data comes in an online fashion and needs to be processed on the fly. Moreover, in practical application, there is a trade-off between accuracy and fairness that needs to be accounted for, but current methods often have multiple hyperparameters with non-trivial interaction to achieve fairness. In this paper, we propose a flexible ensemble algorithm for fair decision-making in the more challenging context of evolving online settings. This algorithm, called FARF (Fair and Adaptive Random Forests), is based on using online component classifiers and updating them according to the current distribution, that also accounts for fairness and a single hyperparameters that alters fairness-accuracy balance. Experiments on real-world discriminated data streams demonstrate the utility of FARF.

Gradient Boosting algorithms tackle one of the biggest problems in Machine Learning: bias. Decision Trees is a simple and flexible algorithm. An underfit Decision Tree has low depth, meaning it splits the dataset only a few of times in an attempt to separate the data. Because it doesn't separate the dataset into more and more distinct observations, it can't capture the true patterns in it. When it comes to tree-based algorithms Random Forests was revolutionary, because it used Bagging to reduce the overall variance of the model with an ensemble of random trees.

We have entered a new era of machine learning (ML), where the most accurate algorithm with superior predictive power may not even be deployable, unless it is admissible under the regulatory constraints. This has led to great interest in developing fair, transparent and trustworthy ML methods. The purpose of this article is to introduce a new information-theoretic learning framework (admissible machine learning) and algorithmic risk-management tools (InfoGram, L-features, ALFA-testing) that can guide an analyst to redesign off-the-shelf ML methods to be regulatory compliant, while maintaining good prediction accuracy. We have illustrated our approach using several real-data examples from financial sectors, biomedical research, marketing campaigns, and the criminal justice system.

We present a novel implementation of classification using the machine learning / artificial intelligence method called boosted decision trees (BDT) on field programmable gate arrays (FPGA). The firmware implementation of binary classification requiring 100 training trees with a maximum depth of 4 using four input variables gives a latency value of about 10 ns, independent of the clock speed from 100 to 320 MHz in our setup. The low timing values are achieved by restructuring the BDT layout and reconfiguring its parameters. The FPGA resource utilization is also kept low at a range from 0.01% to 0.2% in our setup. A software package called fwXmachina achieves this implementation. Our intended user is an expert of custom electronics-based trigger systems in high energy physics experiments or anyone that needs decisions at the lowest latency values for real-time event classification. Two problems from high energy physics are considered, in the separation of electrons vs. photons and in the selection of vector boson fusion-produced Higgs bosons vs. the rejection of the multijet processes.

Learn how to solve real life problem using the Machine learning techniques Machine Learning models such as Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, KNN etc. Advanced Machine Learning models such as Decision trees, XGBoost, Random Forest, SVM etc. Understanding of basics of statistics and concepts of Machine Learning How to do basic statistical operations and run ML models in Python Indepth knowledge of data collection and data preprocessing for Machine Learning problem How to convert business problem into a Machine learning problem

This article is about how to automatic explain every logics behind every predictions from the decision tree model created by Python's Scikit-Learn. In my case, end users not only want to have prediction results. They also want to know logics behind the prediction to decide next actions. The ability of Machine Learning to predict is very useful. In some cases we also need to know the reason behind that prediction.

Random forests have long been considered as powerful model ensembles in machine learning. By training multiple decision trees, whose diversity is fostered through data and feature subsampling, the resulting random forest can lead to more stable and reliable predictions than a single decision tree. This however comes at the cost of decreased interpretability: while decision trees are often easily interpretable, the predictions made by random forests are much more difficult to understand, as they involve a majority vote over hundreds of decision trees. In this paper, we examine different types of reasons that explain "why" an input instance is classified as positive or negative by a Boolean random forest. Notably, as an alternative to sufficient reasons taking the form of prime implicants of the random forest, we introduce majoritary reasons which are prime implicants of a strict majority of decision trees. For these different abductive explanations, the tractability of the generation problem (finding one reason) and the minimization problem (finding one shortest reason) are investigated. Experiments conducted on various datasets reveal the existence of a trade-off between runtime complexity and sparsity. Sufficient reasons - for which the identification problem is DP-complete - are slightly larger than majoritary reasons that can be generated using a simple linear- time greedy algorithm, and significantly larger than minimal majoritary reasons that can be approached using an anytime P ARTIAL M AX SAT algorithm.