Fairness testing aims at mitigating unintended discrimination in the decision-making process of data-driven AI systems. Individual discrimination may occur when an AI model makes different decisions for two distinct individuals who are distinguishable solely according to protected attributes, such as age and race. Such instances reveal biased AI behaviour, and are called Individual Discriminatory Instances (IDIs). In this paper, we propose an approach for the selection of the initial seeds to generate IDIs for fairness testing. Previous studies mainly used random initial seeds to this end. However this phase is crucial, as these seeds are the basis of the follow-up IDIs generation. We dubbed our proposed seed selection approach I&D. It generates a large number of initial IDIs exhibiting a great diversity, aiming at improving the overall performance of fairness testing. Our empirical study reveal that I&D is able to produce a larger number of IDIs with respect to four state-of-the-art seed generation approaches, generating 1.68X more IDIs on average. Moreover, we compare the use of I&D to train machine learning models and find that using I&D reduces the number of remaining IDIs by 29% when compared to the state-of-the-art, thus indicating that I&D is effective for improving model fairness

Class imbalance poses a major challenge for machine learning as most supervised learning models might exhibit bias towards the majority class and under-perform in the minority class. Cost-sensitive learning tackles this problem by treating the classes differently, formulated typically via a user-defined fixed misclassification cost matrix provided as input to the learner. Such parameter tuning is a challenging task that requires domain knowledge and moreover, wrong adjustments might lead to overall predictive performance deterioration. In this work, we propose a novel cost-sensitive boosting approach for imbalanced data that dynamically adjusts the misclassification costs over the boosting rounds in response to model's performance instead of using a fixed misclassification cost matrix. Our method, called AdaCC, is parameter-free as it relies on the cumulative behavior of the boosting model in order to adjust the misclassification costs for the next boosting round and comes with theoretical guarantees regarding the training error. Experiments on 27 real-world datasets from different domains with high class imbalance demonstrate the superiority of our method over 12 state-of-the-art cost-sensitive boosting approaches exhibiting consistent improvements in different measures, for instance, in the range of [0.3%-28.56%] for AUC, [3.4%-21.4%] for balanced accuracy, [4.8%-45%] for gmean and [7.4%-85.5%] for recall.

When discussing classifiers, decision trees are often thought of as easily interpretable models when compared to numerous more complex classifiers, especially those of the blackbox variety. And this is generally true. This is especially true of rather comparatively simple models created from simple data. This is much-less true of complex decision trees crafted from large amounts of (high-dimensional) data. Even otherwise straightforward decision trees which are of great depth and/or breadth, consisting of heavy branching, can be difficult to trace.

This study investigates the impact of machine learning models on the generation of counterfactual explanations by conducting a benchmark evaluation over three different types of models: decision-tree (fully transparent, interpretable, white-box model), a random forest (a semi-interpretable, grey-box model), and a neural network (a fully opaque, black-box model). We tested the counterfactual generation process using four algorithms (DiCE, WatcherCF, prototype, and GrowingSpheresCF) in the literature in five different datasets (COMPAS, Adult, German, Diabetes, and Breast Cancer). Our findings indicate that: (1) Different machine learning models have no impact on the generation of counterfactual explanations; (2) Counterfactual algorithms based uniquely on proximity loss functions are not actionable and will not provide meaningful explanations; (3) One cannot have meaningful evaluation results without guaranteeing plausibility in the counterfactual generation process. Algorithms that do not consider plausibility in their internal mechanisms will lead to biased and unreliable conclusions if evaluated with the current state-of-the-art metrics; (4) A qualitative analysis is strongly recommended (together with a quantitative analysis) to ensure a robust analysis of counterfactual explanations and the potential identification of biases.

The evolution of digital technology and the increasing popularity of sports inspired the innovators to take the experience of users with a proclivity towards sports to a whole new different level, by introducing Fantasy Sports Platforms FSPs. The application of Data Science and Analytics is Ubiquitous in the Modern World. Data Science and Analytics open doors to gain a deeper understanding and help in the decision making process. We firmly believed that we could adopt Data Science to predict the winning fantasy cricket team on the FSP, Dream 11. We built a predictive model that predicts the performance of players in a prospective game. We used a combination of Greedy and Knapsack Algorithms to prescribe the combination of 11 players to create a fantasy cricket team that has the most significant statistical odds of finishing as the strongest team thereby giving us a higher chance of winning the pot of bets on the Dream 11 FSP. We used PyCaret Python Library to help us understand and adopt the best Regressor Algorithm for our problem statement to make precise predictions. Further, we used Plotly Python Library to give us visual insights into the team, and players performances by accounting for the statistical, and subjective factors of a prospective game. The interactive plots help us to bolster the recommendations of our predictive model. You either win big, win small, or lose your bet based on the performance of the players selected for your fantasy team in the prospective game, and our model increases the probability of you winning big.

Data Science and Analytics have Basketball, Soccer, Tennis, and Cricket. In the modern world, optimized almost every domain that exists in the market. In Sports Analytics is found to be used in almost every our survey we tend to focus mainly how the field of organized sport that is played. Today, we have Sports Analytics has been adopted in the field of sports, how it has Analytics put into use in all primary sports right from Team-contributed to the transformation of the game right from the Selection and On-ground Decision making to business assessment of on-field players and their selection to aspects of the sport. The development of this domain had its prediction of winning team and to the marketing of tickets roots primarily from Statistics, Game Theory, and Decision and business aspects of big sports tournaments. We will Theory, and today, the field also uses Machine Learning and present the analytical tools, algorithms and methodologies Modern Analytical Approaches to decisions on the team and adopted in the field of Sports Analytics for different sports the game itself.

The advancements in machine learning techniques have encouraged researchers to apply these techniques to a myriad of software engineering tasks that use source code analysis, such as testing and vulnerability detection. Such a large number of studies hinders the community from understanding the current research landscape. This paper aims to summarize the current knowledge in applied machine learning for source code analysis. We review studies belonging to twelve categories of software engineering tasks and corresponding machine learning techniques, tools, and datasets that have been applied to solve them. To do so, we conducted an extensive literature search and identified 479 primary studies published between 2011 and 2021. We summarize our observations and findings with the help of the identified studies. Our findings suggest that the use of machine learning techniques for source code analysis tasks is consistently increasing. We synthesize commonly used steps and the overall workflow for each task and summarize machine learning techniques employed. We identify a comprehensive list of available datasets and tools useable in this context. Finally, the paper discusses perceived challenges in this area, including the availability of standard datasets, reproducibility and replicability, and hardware resources.

In many machine learning applications, e.g., tree-based ensembles, floating point numbers are extensively utilized due to their expressiveness. Nowadays performing data analysis on embedded devices from dynamic data masses becomes available, but such systems often lack hardware capabilities to process floating point numbers, introducing large overheads for their processing. Even if such hardware is present in general computing systems, using integer operations instead of floating point operations promises to reduce operation overheads and improve the performance. In this paper, we provide \mdname, a full precision floating point comparison for random forests, by only using integer and logic operations. To ensure the same functionality preserves, we formally prove the correctness of this comparison. Since random forests only require comparison of floating point numbers during inference, we implement \mdname~in low level realizations and therefore eliminate the need for floating point hardware entirely, by keeping the model accuracy unchanged. The usage of \mdname~basically boils down to a one-by-one replacement of conditions: For instance, a comparison statement in C: if(pX[3]<=(float)10.074347) becomes if((*(((int*)(pX))+3))<=((int)(0x41213087))). Experimental evaluation on X86 and ARMv8 desktop and server class systems shows that the execution time can be reduced by up to $\approx 30\%$ with our novel approach.

Academic and scientific research activities have a growing economic importance, requiring larger outlays and investments both in advanced and emerging nations. In both cases it is a matter of national prestige but more than that, of strategic relevance, since the presence of large numbers of highly educated citizens contributing to the advance of human knowledge has well-established impacts on technological and industrial capabilities. These, in turn, are highly relevant to ensure the competitiveness and the economic security of nations as well as yielding other benefits to the economy (Dasgupta and David (1994) and Salter and Martin (2001)). The care and promotion of research activities should thus be a focus of public policies aimed at ensuring social and economic development (Stephan (2012) and Etzkowitz (2013)). A particularly pressing issue in this matter is to assess the quality of the production generated by researchers in all fields of knowledge. On one hand, it is of interest to detect areas in which nationals have international impact, as to concentrate resources on them.

Neural networks (NNs) and decision trees (DTs) are both popular models of machine learning, yet coming with mutually exclusive advantages and limitations. To bring the best of the two worlds, a variety of approaches are proposed to integrate NNs and DTs explicitly or implicitly. In this survey, these approaches are organized in a school which we term as neural trees (NTs). This survey aims to present a comprehensive review of NTs and attempts to identify how they enhance the model interpretability. We first propose a thorough taxonomy of NTs that expresses the gradual integration and co-evolution of NNs and DTs. Afterward, we analyze NTs in terms of their interpretability and performance, and suggest possible solutions to the remaining challenges. Finally, this survey concludes with a discussion about other considerations like conditional computation and promising directions towards this field. A list of papers reviewed in this survey, along with their corresponding codes, is available at: https://github.com/zju-vipa/awesome-neural-trees