Token embeddings, a mapping from discrete lexical symbols to continuous vectors, are at the heart of any language model (LM). However, lexical symbol meanings can also be determined and even redefined by their structural role in a long context. In this paper, we ask: is it possible for a language model to be performant without any fixed token embeddings? Such a language model would have to rely entirely on the co-occurence and repetition of tokens in the context rather than the a priori identity of any token. To answer this, we study lexinvariant language models that are invariant to lexical symbols and therefore do not need fixed token embeddings in practice.

In this work, we investigate the expressiveness of the "conditional mutual information" (CMI) framework of Steinke and Zakynthinou [1] and the prospect of using it to provide a unified framework for proving generalization bounds in the realizable setting. We first demonstrate that one can use this framework to express non-trivial (but sub-optimal) bounds for any learning algorithm that outputs hypotheses from a class of bounded VC dimension. We then explore two directions of strengthening this bound: (i) Can the CMI framework express optimal bounds for VC classes?

In this work, we investigate the expressiveness of the "conditional mutual information" (CMI) framework of Steinke and Zakynthinou [1] and the prospect of using it to provide a unified framework for proving generalization bounds in the realizable setting. We first demonstrate that one can use this framework to express non-trivial (but sub-optimal) bounds for any learning algorithm that outputs hypotheses from a class of bounded VC dimension. We then explore two directions of strengthening this bound: (i) Can the CMI framework express optimal bounds for VC classes?

This paper addresses the problem of nearly optimal Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension (VC-dimension) and pseudo-dimension estimations of the derivative functions of deep neural networks (DNNs). Two important applications of these estimations include: 1) Establishing a nearly tight approximation result of DNNs in the Sobolev space; 2) Characterizing the generalization error of machine learning methods with loss functions involving function derivatives. This theoretical investigation fills the gap of learning error estimations for a wide range of physics-informed machine learning models and applications including generative models, solving partial differential equations, operator learning, network compression, distillation, regularization, etc.

We consider the problem of multiclass transductive online learning when the number of labels can be unbounded. Previous works by Ben-David et al. [1997] and Hanneke et al. [2023b] only consider the case of binary and finite label spaces, respectively. The latter work determined that their techniques fail to extend to the case of unbounded label spaces, and they pose the question of characterizing the optimal mistake bound for unbounded label spaces. We answer this question by showing that a new dimension, termed the Level-constrained Littlestone dimension, characterizes online learnability in this setting. Along the way, we show that the trichotomy of possible minimax rates of the expected number of mistakes established by Hanneke et al. [2023b] for finite label spaces in the realizable setting continues to hold even when the label space is unbounded.

We generalize the notion of average Lipschitz smoothness proposed by Ashlagi et al. [2021] by extending it to Hölder smoothness. This measure of the "effective smoothness" of a function is sensitive to the underlying distribution and can be dramatically smaller than its classic "worst-case" Hölder constant. We consider both the realizable and the agnostic (noisy) regression settings, proving upper and lower risk bounds in terms of the average Hölder smoothness; these rates improve upon both previously known rates even in the special case of average Lipschitz smoothness. Moreover, our lower bound is tight in the realizable setting up to log factors, thus we establish the minimax rate. From an algorithmic perspective, since our notion of average smoothness is defined with respect to the unknown underlying distribution, the learner does not have an explicit representation of the function class, hence is unable to execute ERM. Nevertheless, we provide distinct learning algorithms that achieve both (nearly) optimal learning rates. Our results hold in any totally bounded metric space, and are stated in terms of its intrinsic geometry. Overall, our results show that the classic worst-case notion of Hölder smoothness can be essentially replaced by its average, yielding considerably sharper guarantees.

In many applications, data is collected in batches, some of which may be corrupt or even adversarial. Recent work derived optimal robust algorithms for estimating finite distributions in this setting. We develop a general framework of robust learning from batches, and determine the limits of both distribution estimation, and notably, classification, over arbitrary, including continuous, domains. Building on this framework, we derive the first robust agnostic: (1) polynomial-time distribution estimation algorithms for structured distributions, including piecewisepolynomial, monotone, log-concave, and gaussian-mixtures, and also significantly improve their sample complexity; (2) classification algorithms, and also establish their near-optimal sample complexity; (3) computationally-efficient algorithms for the fundamental problem of interval-based classification that underlies nearly all natural-1-dimensional classification problems.