Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Computational Learning Theory


Learning Concepts Described by Weight Aggregation Logic

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We consider weighted structures, which extend ordinary relational structures by assigning weights, i.e. elements from a particular group or ring, to tuples present in the structure. We introduce an extension of first-order logic that allows to aggregate weights of tuples, compare such aggregates, and use them to build more complex formulas. We provide locality properties of fragments of this logic including Feferman-Vaught decompositions and a Gaifman normal form for a fragment called FOW1, as well as a localisation theorem for a larger fragment called FOWA1. This fragment can express concepts from various machine learning scenarios. Using the locality properties, we show that concepts definable in FOWA1 over a weighted background structure of at most polylogarithmic degree are agnostically PAC-learnable in polylogarithmic time after pseudo-linear time preprocessing.


Probably Approximately Correct Explanations of Machine Learning Models via Syntax-Guided Synthesis

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We propose a novel approach to understanding the decision making of complex machine learning models (e.g., deep neural networks) using a combination of probably approximately correct learning (PAC) and a logic inference methodology called syntax-guided synthesis (SyGuS). We prove that our framework produces explanations that with a high probability make only few errors and show empirically that it is effective in generating small, human-interpretable explanations.


A Simple Proof of Optimal Approximations

arXiv.org Machine Learning

The fundamental result of Li, Long, and Srinivasan on approximations of set systems has become a key tool across several communities such as learning theory, algorithms, combinatorics and data analysis (described as `the pinnacle of a long sequence of papers'). The goal of this paper is to give a simpler, self-contained, modular proof of this result for finite set systems. The only ingredient we assume is the standard Chernoff's concentration bound. This makes the proof accessible to a wider audience, readers not familiar with techniques from statistical learning theory, and makes it possible to be covered in a single self-contained lecture in an algorithms course.


Adiabatic Quantum Optimization Fails to Solve the Knapsack Problem

#artificialintelligence

In this work, we attempt to solve the integer-weight knapsack problem using the D-Wave 2000Q adiabatic quantum computer. The knapsack problem is a well-known NP-complete problem in computer science, with applications in economics, business, finance, etc. We attempt to solve a number of small knapsack problems whose optimal solutions are known; we find that adiabatic quantum optimization fails to produce solutions corresponding to optimal filling of the knapsack in all problem instances. We compare results obtained on the quantum hardware to the classical simulated annealing algorithm and two solvers employing a hybrid branch-and-bound algorithm. The simulated annealing algorithm also fails to produce the optimal filling of the knapsack, though solutions obtained by simulated and quantum annealing are no more similar to each other than to the correct solution.


Adiabatic Quantum Optimization Fails to Solve the Knapsack Problem

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

In this work, we attempt to solve the integer-weight knapsack problem using the D-Wave 2000Q adiabatic quantum computer. The knapsack problem is a well-known NP-complete problem in computer science, with applications in economics, business, finance, etc. We attempt to solve a number of small knapsack problems whose optimal solutions are known; we find that adiabatic quantum optimization fails to produce solutions corresponding to optimal filling of the knapsack in all problem instances. We compare results obtained on the quantum hardware to the classical simulated annealing algorithm and two solvers employing a hybrid branch-and-bound algorithm. The simulated annealing algorithm also fails to produce the optimal filling of the knapsack, though solutions obtained by simulated and quantum annealing are no more similar to each other than to the correct solution. We discuss potential causes for this observed failure of adiabatic quantum optimization.


A Gentle Introduction to Computational Learning Theory - AnalyticsWeek

#artificialintelligence

Computational learning theory, or statistical learning theory, refers to mathematical frameworks for quantifying learning tasks and algorithms. These are sub-fields of machine learning that a machine learning practitioner does not need to know in great depth in order to achieve good results on a wide range of problems. Nevertheless, it is a sub-field where having a high-level understanding of some of the more prominent methods may provide insight into the broader task of learning from data. In this post, you will discover a gentle introduction to computational learning theory for machine learning. A Gentle Introduction to Computational Learning Theory Photo by someone10x, some rights reserved.


Conjunctive Queries: Unique Characterizations and Exact Learnability

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We answer the question which conjunctive queries are uniquely characterized by polynomially many positive and negative examples, and how to construct such examples efficiently. As a consequence, we obtain a new efficient exact learning algorithm for a class of conjunctive queries. At the core of our contributions lie two new polynomial-time algorithms for constructing frontiers in the homomorphism lattice of finite structures. We also discuss implications for the unique characterizability and learnability of schema mappings and of description logic concepts.


A Gentle Introduction to Computational Learning Theory

#artificialintelligence

Computational learning theory, or statistical learning theory, refers to mathematical frameworks for quantifying learning tasks and algorithms. These are sub-fields of machine learning that a machine learning practitioner does not need to know in great depth in order to achieve good results on a wide range of problems. Nevertheless, it is a sub-field where having a high-level understanding of some of the more prominent methods may provide insight into the broader task of learning from data. In this post, you will discover a gentle introduction to computational learning theory for machine learning. A Gentle Introduction to Computational Learning Theory Photo by someone10x, some rights reserved.


Attribute-Efficient Learning of Halfspaces with Malicious Noise: Near-Optimal Label Complexity and Noise Tolerance

arXiv.org Machine Learning

This paper is concerned with computationally efficient learning of homogeneous sparse halfspaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$ under noise. Though recent works have established attribute-efficient learning algorithms under various types of label noise (e.g. bounded noise), it remains an open question when and how $s$-sparse halfspaces can be efficiently learned under the challenging malicious noise model, where an adversary may corrupt both the unlabeled examples and the labels. We answer this question in the affirmative by designing a computationally efficient active learning algorithm with near-optimal label complexity of $\tilde{O}\big({s \log^4 \frac d \epsilon} \big)$ and noise tolerance $\eta = \Omega(\epsilon)$, where $\epsilon \in (0, 1)$ is the target error rate, under the assumption that the distribution over (uncorrupted) unlabeled examples is isotropic log-concave. Our algorithm can be straightforwardly tailored to the passive learning setting, and we show that the sample complexity is $\tilde{O}\big({\frac 1 \epsilon s^2 \log^5 d} \big)$ which also enjoys the attribute efficiency. Our main techniques include attribute-efficient paradigms for instance reweighting and for empirical risk minimization, and a new analysis of uniform concentration for unbounded data -- all of them crucially take the structure of the underlying halfspace into account.


Departmental Teaching awards announced

Oxford Comp Sci

Prof. Gavin Lowe Excellent student feedback for teaching Concurrent Programming and Concurrency (with the latter moved to remote teaching during TT 2020).