Enhancing large language models by simply scaling up datasets has begun to yield diminishing returns, shifting the spotlight to data quality. Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) has emerged as a powerful technique for generating high-quality chain-of-thought data, yet conventional approaches typically retain only the topscoring trajectory from the search tree, discarding sibling nodes that often contain valuable partial insights, recurrent error patterns, and alternative reasoning strategies. This unconditional rejection of non-optimal reasoning branches may waste vast amounts of informative data in the whole search tree. We propose SIGMA (Sibling Guided Monte Carlo Augmentation), a novel framework that reintegrates these discarded sibling nodes to refine LLM reasoning. SIGMA forges semantic links among sibling nodes along each search path and applies a two-stage refinement: a critique model identifies overlooked strengths and weaknesses across the sibling set, and a revision model conducts text-based backpropagation to refine the top-scoring trajectory in light of this comparative feedback. By recovering and amplifying the underutilized but valuable signals from non-optimal reasoning branches, SIGMA substantially improves reasoning trajectories. On the challenging MATH benchmark, our SIGMA-tuned 7B model achieves 54.92% accuracy using only 30K samples, outperforming state-of-the-art models trained on 590K samples. This result highlights that our sibling-guided optimization not only significantly reduces data usage but also significantly boosts LLM reasoning.

Open-world reinforcement learning challenges agents to develop intelligent behavior in vast exploration spaces. Recent approaches like LS-Imagine have advanced the field by extending imagination horizons through jumpy state transitions, yet remain limited by fixed exploration mechanisms and static jump thresholds that cannot adapt across changing task phases, resulting in inefficient exploration and lower completion rates. Humans demonstrate remarkable capabilities in openworld decision-making through a chain-like process of task decomposition, selective memory utilization, and adaptive uncertainty regulation. Inspired by human decision-making processes, we present Cognitive Predictive Processing (CPP), a novel framework that integrates three neurologically-inspired systems: a phaseadaptive cognitive controller that dynamically decomposes tasks into exploration, approach, and completion phases with adaptive parameters; a dual-memory integration system implementing dual-modal memory that balances immediate context with selective long-term storage; and an uncertainty-modulated prediction regulator that continuously updates environmental predictions to modulate exploration behavior. Comprehensive experiments in MineDojo demonstrate that these humaninspired decision-making strategies enhance performance over recent techniques, with success rates improving by an average of 4.6% across resource collection tasks while reducing task completion steps by an average of 7.1%. Our approach bridges cognitive neuroscience and reinforcement learning, excelling in complex scenarios that require sustained exploration and strategic adaptation while demonstrating how neural-inspired models can solve key challenges in open-world AI systems.

Test-time compute has empowered multimodal large language models to generate extended reasoning chains, yielding strong performance on tasks such as multimodal math reasoning. However, we observe that this improved reasoning ability often comes with increased hallucination: as generations become longer, models tend to drift away from image-grounded content and rely more on language priors. Attention analysis reveals that longer reasoning chains reduce focus on visual inputs, contributing to hallucination. To systematically study this phenomenon, we introduce RH-AUC, a metric that quantifies how a model's perception accuracy changes with reasoning length, enabling evaluation of whether the model preserves visual grounding while reasoning. We also release RH-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark covering diverse multimodal tasks, designed to jointly assess the balance of reasoning ability and hallucination. We find that (i) larger models generally exhibit a better balance between reasoning and perception; (ii) reasoning and perception balance depends more on the types and domains of the training data than its volume. Our findings highlight the need for evaluation frameworks that account for both reasoning quality and perceptual reliability.

Self-e beha Despite vior volution, curre, is essential nt the adv ability ancements for the of embodied agents in reinforcement to autonomously domain with fine-tuning long-horizon, improv (RFT) e their real-w sho reasoning wing orld strong tasks.

Effective denoising is critical for managing complex visual inputs contaminated with noisy distractors in model-based reinforcement learning (RL). Current methods often oversimplify the decomposition of observations by neglecting the conditional dependence between task-relevant and task-irrelevant components given an observation. To address this limitation, we introduce CsDreamer, a modelbased RL approach built upon the world model of Collider-structure Recurrent State-Space Model (CsRSSM). CsRSSM incorporates colliders to comprehensively model the denoising inference process and explicitly capture the conditional dependence. Furthermore, it employs a decoupling regularization to balance the influence of this conditional dependence. By accurately inferring a task-relevant state space, CsDreamer improves learning efficiency during rollouts. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of CsRSSM in extracting task-relevant information, leading to CsDreamer outperforming existing approaches in environments characterized by complex noise interference.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable success in video understanding tasks. Yet, a key question remains: do they comprehend visual information, or merely learn superficial mappings between visual and textual patterns? Understanding visual cues, particularly those related to physics and common sense, is crucial for AI systems interacting with the physical world. However, existing VLM evaluations primarily rely on positivecontrol tests using real-world videos that resemble training distributions. While VLMs perform well on such benchmarks, it is unclear whether they grasp underlying visual and contextual signals or simply exploit visual-language correlations. To fill this gap, we propose incorporating negative-control tests, i.e., videos depicting physically impossible or logically inconsistent scenarios, and evaluating whether models can recognize these violations.

To quantify this stagnation, we introduce LIVEVQA, the first-of-its-kind dataset featuring 107,143 samples and 12 categories data specifically designed to support research in both seeking and updating with live visual knowledge. Drawing from recent news articles, video platforms, and academic publications in April 2024-May 2025, LIVEVQA enables evaluation of how models handle latest visual information beyond their knowledge boundaries and how current methods help to update them. Our comprehensive benchmarking of 17 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals significant performance gaps on content beyond knowledge cutoff, and tool-use or agentic visual seeking framework drastically gain an average of 327% improvement. Furthermore, we explore parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods to update MLLMs with new visual knowledge. We dive deeply to the critical balance between adapter capacity and model capability when updating MLLMs with new visual knowledge. All the experimental dataset and source code are publicly available at: https://livevqa.github.io.

Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable capabilities by integrating visual perception with language understanding, enabling applications such as image-grounded dialogue, visual question answering, and scientific analysis. However, most MLLMs adopt a static inference paradigm, encoding the entire image into fixed visual tokens upfront, which limits their ability to iteratively refine understanding or adapt to context during inference. This contrasts sharply with human perception, which is dynamic, selective, and feedback-driven. In this work, we introduce a novel framework for inference-time visual token scaling that enables MLLMs to perform iterative, verifier-guided reasoning over visual content. We formulate the problem as a Markov Decision Process, involving a reasoner that proposes visual actions and a verifier--trained via multi-step Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)--that evaluates these actions and determines when reasoning should terminate. To support this, we present a new dataset, VTS, comprising supervised reasoning trajectories (VTS-SFT) and preference-labeled reasoning comparisons (VTS-DPO). Our method significantly outperforms existing approaches across diverse visual reasoning benchmarks, offering not only improved accuracy but also more interpretable and grounded reasoning processes. These results demonstrate the promise of dynamic inference mechanisms for enabling fine-grained, context-aware visual reasoning in next-generation MLLMs. Code and datasets are publicly released at https://vts-v.github.io/.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant performance gains through test-time scaling methods. However, existing approaches often incur redundant computations due to the accumulation of historical dependency information during inference. To address this challenge, we leverage the memoryless property of Markov processes to minimize reliance on historical context and propose a Markovian reasoning process. This foundational Markov chain structure enables seamless integration with various test-time scaling methods, thereby improving their scaling efficiency. By further scaling up the Markovian reasoning chain through integration with techniques such as tree search and reflective refinement, we uncover an emergent atomic reasoning structure, where reasoning trajectories are decomposed into a series of self-contained, low-complexity atomic units. We name this design Atom of Thoughts (AOT). Extensive experiments demonstrate that AOT consistently outperforms existing baselines as computational budgets increase. Importantly, AOT integrates seamlessly with existing reasoning frameworks and different LLMs (both reasoning and non-reasoning), facilitating scalable, high-performance inference.We submit our code alongside this paper and will make it publicly available to facilitate reproducibility and future research.

Contextual Markov Decision Processes (cMDP) model this challenge, but existing methods often require explicit context variables (e.g., friction, gravity), limiting their use when contexts are latent or hard to measure. We introduce Dynamics-Aligned Latent Imagination (DALI), a framework integrated within the Dreamer architecture that infers latent context representations from agent-environment interactions. By training a self-supervised encoder to predict forward dynamics, DALI generates actionable representations conditioning the world model and policy, bridging perception and control. We theoretically prove this encoder is essential for efficient context inference and robust generalization. DALI's latent space enables counterfactual consistency: Perturbing a gravity-encoding dimension alters imagined rollouts in physically plausible ways. On challenging cMDP benchmarks, DALI achieves significant gains over contextunaware baselines, often surpassing context-aware baselines in extrapolation tasks, enabling zero-shot generalization to unseen contextual variations.