In the last decade the emphasis on improving the operational performance of domain independent automated planners has been in developing complex techniques which merge a range of different strategies. This quest for operational advantage, driven by the regular international planning competitions, has not made it easy to study, understand and predict what combinations of techniques will have what effect on a planner’s behaviour in a particular application domain. In this paper, we consider two machine learning techniques for planner performance improvement, and exploit a modular approach to their combination in order to facilitate the analysis of the impact of each individual component. We believe this can contribute to the development of more transparent planning engines, which are designed using modular, interchangeable, and well-founded components. Specifically, we combined two previously unrelated learning techniques, entanglements and relational decision trees, to guide a “vanilla” search algorithm. We report on a large experimental analysis which demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach in terms of performance improvements, resulting in a very competitive planning configuration despite the use of a more modular and transparent architecture. This gives insights on the strengths and weaknesses of the considered approaches, that will help their future exploitation.

Snake in the Box (SIB) is the problem of finding the longest simple path along the edges of an n -dimensional cube, subject to certain constraints. SIB has important applications in coding theory and communications. State of the art algorithms for solving SIB apply uninformed search with symmetry breaking techniques. We formalize this problem as a search problem and propose several admissible heuristics to solve it. Using the proposed heuristics is shown to have a huge impact on the number of nodes expanded and, in some configurations, on runtime. These results encourage further research in using heuristic search to solve SIB, and to solve maximization problems more generally.

Multi-context Systems (MCSs) are a formalism for systems consisting of knowledge bases (possibly heterogeneous and non-monotonic) that are interlinked via bridge rules, where the global system semantics emerges from the local semantics of the knowledge bases (also called contexts) in an equilibrium. While MCSs and related formalisms are inherently targeted for distributed set- tings, no truly distributed algorithms for their evaluation were available. We address this short- coming and present a suite of such algorithms which includes a basic algorithm DMCS, an ad- vanced version DMCSOPT that exploits topology-based optimizations, and a streaming algorithm DMCS-STREAMING that computes equilibria in packages of bounded size. The algorithms be- have quite differently in several respects, as experienced in thorough experimental evaluation of a system prototype. From the experimental results, we derive a guideline for choosing the appropriate algorithm and running mode in particular situations, determined by the parameter settings.

In relational databases, relations between objects, represented by binary matrices or tensors, may be arbitrarily complex. In practice however, there are recurring relational patterns such as transitive, permutation and sequential relationships, that seem to have a regular structure not captured by the classical notion of matrix rank or tensor rank. In this paper, we show that factorizing the relational tensor using a logistic or hinge loss instead of the more standard squared loss is more appropriate because it can accurately model many common relations with a fixed-size embedding that depends sub-linearly on the number of entities in the knowledge base. We illustrate this fact empirically by being able to efficiently predict missing links in several synthetic and real-world experiments. Further, we provide theoretical justification for logistic loss by studying its connection to a complexity measure from the field of information complexity called the sign rank. Sign rank is a more appropriate complexity measure as it has a low value for transitive, permutation, or sequential relationships, while being large for uniformly sampled binary matrices/tensors with a high probability.

Planning for and controlling a network of interacting devices requires a planner that accounts for the automatic timed transitions of devices, while meeting deadlines and achieving durative goals. Consider a planner for an imaging satellite with a camera that cannot tolerate exhaust. The planner would need to determine that opening a valve causes a chain reaction that ignites the engine, and thus needs to shield the camera. While planners exist that support deadlines and durative goals, currently, no planners can handle automatic timed transitions. We present tBurton, a temporal planner that supports these features, while additionally producing a temporally least-commitment plan. tBurton uses a divide and conquer approach: dividing the problem using causal-graph decomposition and conquering each factor with heuristic forward search. The `sub-plans' from each factor are then unified in a conflict directed search, guided by the causal graph structure. We describe why this approach is fast and efficient, and demonstrate its ability to improve the performance of existing planners on factorable problems through benchmarks from the International Planning Competition.

Modularity is an essential aspect of knowledge representation theory and practice. It has received substantial attention. We introduce model-based modular systems, an abstract framework for modular knowledge representation formalisms, similar in scope to multi-context systems but employing a simpler information-flow mechanism. We establish the precise relationship between the two frameworks, showing that they can simulate each other. We demonstrate that recently introduced modular knowledge representation formalisms integrating logic programming with satisfiability and, more generally, with constraint satisfaction can be cast as modular systems in our sense. These results show that our formalism offers a simple unifying framework for studies of modularity in knowledge representation.

We create a unified framework for analyzing and synthesizing plans with loops for solving problems with non-deterministic numeric effects and a limited form of partial observability. Three different action models---with deterministic, qualitative non-deterministic and Boolean non-deterministic semantics---are handled using a single abstract representation. We establish the conditions under which the correctness and termination of solutions, represented as abstract policies, can be verified. We also examine the feasibility of learning abstract policies from examples. We demonstrate our techniques on several planning problems and show that they apply to challenging real-world tasks such as doing the laundry with a PR2 robot. These results resolve a number of open questions about planning with loops and facilitate the development of new algorithms and applications.

Whereas people learn many different types of knowledge from diverse experiences over many years, most current machine learning systems acquire just a single function or data model from just a single data set. We propose a never-ending learning paradigm for machine learning, to better reflect the more ambitious and encompassing type of learning performed by humans. As a case study, we describe the Never-Ending Language Learner (NELL), which achieves some of the desired properties of a never-ending learner, and we discuss lessons learned. NELL has been learning to read the web 24 hours/day since January 2010, and so far has acquired a knowledge base with over 80 million confidence-weighted beliefs (e.g., servedWith(tea, biscuits) ). NELL has also learned millions of features and parameters that enable it to read these beliefs from the web. Additionally, it has learned to reason over these beliefs to infer new beliefs, and is able to extend its ontology by synthesizing new relational predicates. NELL can be tracked online at http://rtw.ml.cmu.edu, and followed on Twitter at @CMUNELL.

Knowledge representation and reasoning (KR) stems ing the representation and computational management of from a deep tradition in logic. In particular, it aims at building knowledge. The first KR conference was held 25 years ago systems that know about their world and are able to act in in 1989. The last KR edition KR 2014 was the 14th and was an informed way in it, as humans do. A crucial part of these held 25th year of the first KR conference.

There are very few reasoners which combine natural deduction and subsumption reasoning, and there are none which do so while supporting concurrency. Inference Graphs are a graph-based inference mechanism using an expressive first-order logic, capable of subsumption and natural deduction reasoning using concurrency. Evaluation of concurrency characteristics on a combination natural deduction and subsumption reasoning problem has shown linear speedup with the number of processors.