This technical report describes the multi-label classification (MLC) search space in the MEKA software, including the traditional/meta MLC algorithms, and the traditional/meta/pre-processing single-label classification (SLC) algorithms. The SLC search space is also studied because is part of MLC search space as several methods use problem transformation methods to create a solution (i.e., a classifier) for a MLC problem. This was done in order to understand better the MLC algorithms. Finally, we propose a grammar that formally expresses this understatement.

Many modern machine learning approaches require vast amounts of training data to learn new concepts; conversely, human learning often requires few examples--sometimes only one--from which the learner can abstract structural concepts. We present a novel approach to introducing new spatial structures to an AI agent, combining deep learning over qualitative spatial relations with various heuristic search algorithms. The agent extracts spatial relations from a sparse set of noisy examples of block-based structures, and trains convolutional and sequential models of those relation sets. To create novel examples of similar structures, the agent begins placing blocks on a virtual table, uses a CNN to predict the most similar complete example structure after each placement, an LSTM to predict the most likely set of remaining moves needed to complete it, and recommends one using heuristic search. We verify that the agent learned the concept by observing its virtual block-building activities, wherein it ranks each potential subsequent action toward building its learned concept. We empirically assess this approach with human participants' ratings of the block structures. Initial results and qualitative evaluations of structures generated by the trained agent show where it has generalized concepts from the training data, which heuristics perform best within the search space, and how we might improve learning and execution.

Diagnostic reasoning is a key component of many professions. To improve students' diagnostic reasoning skills, educational psychologists analyse and give feedback on epistemic activities used by these students while diagnosing, in particular, hypothesis generation, evidence generation, evidence evaluation, and drawing conclusions. However, this manual analysis is highly time-consuming. We aim to enable the large-scale adoption of diagnostic reasoning analysis and feedback by automating the epistemic activity identification. We create the first corpus for this task, comprising diagnostic reasoning self-explanations of students from two domains annotated with epistemic activities. Based on insights from the corpus creation and the task's characteristics, we discuss three challenges for the automatic identification of epistemic activities using AI methods: the correct identification of epistemic activity spans, the reliable distinction of similar epistemic activities, and the detection of overlapping epistemic activities. We propose a separate performance metric for each challenge and thus provide an evaluation framework for future research. Indeed, our evaluation of various state-of-the-art recurrent neural network architectures reveals that current techniques fail to address some of these challenges.

Human-robot communication in situated environments involves a complex interplay between knowledge representations across a wide variety of modalities. Crucially, linguistic information must be associated with representations of objects, locations, people, and goals, which may be represented in very different ways. In previous work, we developed a Consultant Framework that facilitates modality-agnostic access to information distributed across a set of heterogeneously represented knowledge sources. In this work, we draw inspiration from cognitive science to augment these distributed knowledge sources with Short Term Memory Buffers to create an STM-augmented algorithm for referring expression generation. We then discuss the potential performance benefits of this approach and insights from cognitive science that may inform future refinements in the design of our approach.

Some of the resources in this article originally appeared in one of my comments on a reddit post that became quite popular. Here's the original thread, and my new write-up is below. The first thing you'll need if you want to get better at algorithms and data structures is a solid base. This base can be learned one of several ways, either through a computer science program at university, some coding bootcamps focus a bit on the topics below, or you can learn on your own from books, videos, or online lectures. So you'll need a basic understanding of the following topics to get started: Learn about arrays, linked lists, binary trees, hash tables, graphs, stacks, queues, heaps, and other fundamental data structures.

The verification of planning domain models is crucial to ensure the safety, integrity and correctness of planning-based automated systems. This task is usually performed using model checking techniques. However, directly applying model checkers to verify planning domain models can result in false positives, i.e. counterexamples that are unreachable by a sound planner when using the domain under verification during a planning task. In this paper, we discuss the downside of unconstrained planning domain model verification. We then propose a fail-safe practice for designing planning domain models that can inherently guarantee the safety of the produced plans in case of undetected errors in domain models. In addition, we demonstrate how model checkers, as well as state trajectory constraints planning techniques, should be used to verify planning domain models so that unreachable counterexamples are not returned.

Relational Networks (RN) as introduced by Santoro et al. (2017) have demonstrated strong relational reasoning capabilities with a rather shallow architecture. Its single-layer design, however, only considers pairs of information objects, making it unsuitable for problems requiring reasoning across a higher number of facts. To overcome this limitation, we propose a multi-layer relation network architecture which enables successive refinements of relational information through multiple layers. We show that the increased depth allows for more complex relational reasoning by applying it to the bAbI 20 QA dataset, solving all 20 tasks with joint training and surpassing the state-of-the-art results.

Humans have consciousness as the ability to perceive events and objects: a mental model of the world developed from the most impoverished of visual stimuli, enabling humans to make rapid decisions and take actions. Although spatial and temporal aspects of different scenes are generally diverse, the underlying physics among environments still work the same way, thus learning an abstract description of shared physical dynamics helps human to understand the world. In this paper, we explore building this mental world with neural network models through multi-task learning, namely the meta-world model. We show through extensive experiments that our proposed meta-world models successfully capture the common dynamics over the compact representations of visually different environments from Atari Games. We also demonstrate that agents equipped with our meta-world model possess the ability of visual self-recognition, i.e., recognize themselves from the reflected mirrored environment derived from the classic mirror self-recognition test (MSR).

There is huge demand for robots to work alongside humans in heterogeneous teams. To achieve a high degree of fluidity, robots must be able to (1) recognize their human co-worker's intent, and (2) adapt to this intent accordingly, providing useful aid as a teammate. The literature to date has made great progress in these two areas -- recognition and adaptation -- but largely as separate research activities. In this work, we present a unified approach to these two problems, in which recognition and adaptation occur concurrently and holistically within the same framework. We introduce Pike, an executive for human-robot teams, that allows the robot to continuously and concurrently reason about what a human is doing as execution proceeds, as well as adapt appropriately. The result is a mixed-initiative execution where humans and robots interact fluidly to complete task goals.Key to our approach is our task model: a contingent, temporally-flexible team-plan with explicit choices for both the human and robot. This allows a single set of algorithms to find implicit constraints between sets of choices for the human and robot (as determined via causal link analysis and temporal reasoning), narrowing the possible decisions a rational human would take (hence achieving intent recognition) as well as the possible actions a robot could consistently take (hence achieving adaptation). Pike makes choices based on the preconditions of actions in the plan, temporal constraints, unanticipated disturbances, and choices made previously (by either agent).Innovations of this work include (1) a framework for concurrent intent recognition and adaptation for contingent, temporally-flexible plans, (2) the generalization of causal links for contingent, temporally-flexible plans along with related extraction algorithms, and (3) extensions to a state-of-the-art dynamic execution system to utilize these causal links for decision making.

For social robots to be brought more into widespread use in the fields of companionship, care taking and domestic help, they must be capable of demonstrating social intelligence. In order to be acceptable, they must exhibit socio-communicative skills. Classic approaches to program HRI from observed human-human interactions fails to capture the subtlety of multimodal interactions as well as the key structural differences between robots and humans. The former arises due to a difficulty in quantifying and coding multimodal behaviours, while the latter due to a difference of the degrees of liberty between a robot and a human. However, the notion of reverse engineering from multimodal HRI traces to learn the underlying behavioral blueprint of the robot given multimodal traces seems an option worth exploring. With this spirit, the entire HRI can be seen as a sequence of exchanges of speech acts between the robot and human, each act treated as an action, bearing in mind that the entire sequence is goal-driven. Thus, this entire interaction can be treated as a sequence of actions propelling the interaction from its initial to goal state, also known as a plan in the domain of AI planning. In the same domain, this action sequence that stems from plan execution can be represented as a trace. AI techniques, such as machine learning, can be used to learn behavioral models (also known as symbolic action models in AI), intended to be reusable for AI planning, from the aforementioned multimodal traces. This article reviews recent machine learning techniques for learning planning action models which can be applied to the field of HRI with the intent of rendering robots as socio-communicative.