Warded Datalog+- extends the logic-based language Datalog with existential quantifiers in rule heads. Existential rules are needed for advanced reasoning tasks, e.g., ontological reasoning. The theoretical efficiency guarantees of Warded Datalog+- do not cover extensions crucial for data analytics, such as arithmetic. Moreover, despite the significance of arithmetic for common data analytic scenarios, no decidable fragment of any Datalog+- language extended with arithmetic has been identified. We close this gap by defining a new language that extends Warded Datalog+- with arithmetic and prove its P-completeness. Furthermore, we present an efficient reasoning algorithm for our newly defined language and prove descriptive complexity results for a recently introduced Datalog fragment with integer arithmetic, thereby closing an open question. We lay the theoretical foundation for highly expressive Datalog+- languages that combine the power of advanced recursive rules and arithmetic while guaranteeing efficient reasoning algorithms for applications in modern AI systems, such as Knowledge Graphs.

We characterise the problem of abstraction in the context of deep reinforcement learning. Various well established approaches to analogical reasoning and associative memory might be brought to bear on this issue, but they present difficulties because of the need for end-to-end differentiability. We review developments in AI and machine learning that could facilitate their adoption.

In his 1997 paper on solving Rubik's Cube optimally using IDA* and pattern database heuristics (PDBs), Rich Korf conjectured that there was an inverse relationship between the size of a PDB and the amount of time required for IDA* to solve a problem instance on average. In the current paper, I examine the implications of this relationship, in particular how it limits the ability of abstraction-based heuristic methods, such as PDBs, to scale to larger problems. My overall conclusion is that abstraction will play an important, but auxiliary role in heuristic search systems of the future, in contrast to the primary role it played in Korf's Rubik's Cube work and in much work since.

Pattern databases (PDBs) have been widely used as heuristics for many types of search spaces,but they have always been computed so as to fit in the main memory of the machine usingthe PDB. This paper studies the how external-memory PDBs can be used. It presentsresults of both using hard disk drives and solid-state drives directly to access the data, and of justloading a portion of the PDB into RAM. For the time being, all of these approaches are inferiorto building the largest PDB that fits into RAM.

We are witnessing an explosion of available data from the Web, government authorities, scientific databases, sensors and more. Such datasets could benefit from the introduction of rule sets encoding commonly accepted rules or facts, application- or domain-specific rules, commonsense knowledge etc. This raises the question of whether, how, and to what extent knowledge representation methods are capable of handling the vast amounts of data for these applications. In this paper, we consider nonmonotonic reasoning, which has traditionally focused on rich knowledge structures. In particular, we consider defeasible logic, and analyze how parallelization, using the MapReduce framework, can be used to reason with defeasible rules over huge data sets. Our experimental results demonstrate that defeasible reasoning with billions of data is performant, and has the potential to scale to trillions of facts.

We describe the application of assumption-based argumentation (ABA) to a domain of medical knowledge derived from clinical trials of drugs for breast cancer. We adapt an algorithm for calculating the admissible semantics for ABA frameworks to take account of preferences and describe a prototype implementation which uses variant-based parallel computation to improve the efficiency of query answering.

We consider the problem of synthesizing an agent pro- tocol satisfying LTL specifications for multiple, partially- observable environments. We present a sound and complete procedure for solving the synthesis problem in this setting and show it is computationally optimal from a theoretical com- plexity standpoint. While this produces perfect-recall, hence unbounded, strategies we show how to transform these into agent protocols with bounded number of states.

In this paper we encode some of the reasoning methods used in frame based knowledge representation languages in answer set programming (ASP). In particular, we show how cloning'' and unification'' in frame based systems can be encoded in ASP. We then show how some of the types of queries with respect to a biological knowledge base can be encoded using our methodology. We also provide insight on how the reasoning can be done more efficiently when dealing with a huge knowledge base.

In this paper we introduce an abstract theory of normative reasoning, whose central notion is the generation of obligations, permissions and institutional facts from conditional norms.

We explore the paradigm of artifact-centric systems from a knowledge-based perspective. We provide a semantics based on interpreted-systems to interpret a first-order temporal- epistemic language with identity in a multi-agent setting. We consider the model checking problem for this language and provide abstraction results. We isolate a natural subclass of artifact-systems for which the model checking problem is decidable. We give an upper bound on the complexity of the model checking problem.