We would have two robots searching for the rooms and professors and one remaining Lab, we have a long history of behind in the director's office and tell him/ Our current research focuses on realtime well before the competition. They run the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial SRI's The agent robot has seven sonar sensors, a fast-track technology, called the open-agent architecture vision system from Newton Labs, and a (OAA), was developed at SRI as a way of portable computer on top with a radio ethernet accessing many different types of information for communication to a base station available in computers at different locations. (figure 1). The fast-track system is an interesting device: It consists of a small color video camera and a low-power processor. PC on top to communicate with the other robots and talk to the director.

The team's robot software was nicknamed Their project was to develop software on the Nomad 200 robot for tasks such as maze following, office delivery, and office navigation. In both the second for the competition's Office Navigation and the final rounds, the software achieved event. The perfectly complete the task. It is equipped with 2 sonar route from the director's office to the conference rings of 16 sonars each and with 2 charge-coupled rooms, directed the robot to each of the device (CCD) cameras. The robot has a two conference rooms, correctly determined 486 processor on board with a hard drive and which conference room was not occupied, 16 megabytes of memory. The behaviors at the bottom level needed to worry about low-level responsibilities, such as avoiding obstacles and not hitting walls but did not need to know about the overall strategy for solving the task.

The Fifth Annual AAAI Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition was held in Portland, Oregon, in conjunction with the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. The competition consisted of two events: (1) Office Navigation and (2) Clean Up the Tennis Court. The first event stressed navigation and planning. The second event stressed vision sensing and manipulation. In addition to the competition, there was a mobile robot exhibition in which teams demonstrated robot behaviors that did not fit into the competition tasks. The competition and exhibition were unqualified successes, with nearly 20 teams competing. The robot competition raised the standard for autonomous mobile robotics, demonstrating the intelligent integration of perception, deliberation, and action.

This article is the content of an invited talk given by the authors at the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96). The piece begins with a short history of the competition, then discusses the technical challenges and the political and cultural issues associated with bringing it off every year. We also cover the science and engineering involved with the robot tasks and the educational and commercial aspects of the competition. We finish with a discussion of the community formed by the organizers, participants, and the conference attendees. The original talk made liberal use of video clips and slide photographs; so, we have expanded the text and added photographs to make up for the lack of such media.

Instance-based learning techniques typically handle continuous and linear input values well, but often do not handle nominal input attributes appropriately. The Value Difference Metric (VDM) was designed to find reasonable distance values between nominal attribute values, but it largely ignores continuous attributes, requiring discretization to map continuous values into nominal values. This paper proposes three new heterogeneous distance functions, called the Heterogeneous Value Difference Metric (HVDM), the Interpolated Value Difference Metric (IVDM), and the Windowed Value Difference Metric (WVDM). These new distance functions are designed to handle applications with nominal attributes, continuous attributes, or both. In experiments on 48 applications the new distance metrics achieve higher classification accuracy on average than three previous distance functions on those datasets that have both nominal and continuous attributes.

In the Poisson neuron model, the output is a rate-modulated Poisson process(Snyder and Miller, 1991); the time varying rate parameter ret)is an instantaneous function G[.] of the stimulus, ret) G[s(t)]. In a Poisson neuron, then, ret) gives the instantaneous firingrate-the instantaneous probability of firing at any instant t-and the output is a stochastic function of the input. In part because of its great simplicity, this model is widely used (usually withthe addition of a refractory period), especially in in vivo single unit electrophysiological studies, where set) is usually taken to be the value of some sensory stimulus. In the integrate-and-fire neuron model, by contrast, the output is a filtered and thresholded function of the input: the input is passed through a low-pass filter (determined by the membrane time constant T) and integrated until themembrane potential vet) reaches threshold 8, at which point vet) is reset to its initial value. By contrast with the Poisson model, in the integrate-and-fire model the ouput is a deterministic function of the input. Although the integrate-and-fire model is a caricature of real neural dynamics, it captures many of the qualitative features, andis often used as a starting point for conceptualizing the biophysical behavior of single neurons.

There is currently considerable interest in developing general nonlinear densitymodels based on latent, or hidden, variables. Such models have the ability to discover the presence of a relatively small number of underlying'causes' which, acting in combination, give rise to the apparent complexity of the observed data set. Unfortunately, totrain such models generally requires large computational effort. In this paper we introduce a novel latent variable algorithm which retains the general nonlinear capabilities of previous models but which uses a training procedure based on the EM algorithm. We demonstrate the performance of the model on a toy problem and on data from flow diagnostics for a multiphase oil pipeline.

In the Poisson neuron model, the output is a rate-modulated Poisson process (Snyder and Miller, 1991); the time varying rate parameter ret) is an instantaneous function G[.] of the stimulus, ret) G[s(t)]. In a Poisson neuron, then, ret) gives the instantaneous firing rate-the instantaneous probability of firing at any instant t-and the output is a stochastic function of the input. In part because of its great simplicity, this model is widely used (usually with the addition of a refractory period), especially in in vivo single unit electrophysiological studies, where set) is usually taken to be the value of some sensory stimulus. In the integrate-and-fire neuron model, by contrast, the output is a filtered and thresholded function of the input: the input is passed through a low-pass filter (determined by the membrane time constant T) and integrated until the membrane potential vet) reaches threshold 8, at which point vet) is reset to its initial value. By contrast with the Poisson model, in the integrate-and-fire model the ouput is a deterministic function of the input. Although the integrate-and-fire model is a caricature of real neural dynamics, it captures many of the qualitative features, and is often used as a starting point for conceptualizing the biophysical behavior of single neurons.

There is currently considerable interest in developing general nonlinear density models based on latent, or hidden, variables. Such models have the ability to discover the presence of a relatively small number of underlying'causes' which, acting in combination, give rise to the apparent complexity of the observed data set. Unfortunately, to train such models generally requires large computational effort. In this paper we introduce a novel latent variable algorithm which retains the general nonlinear capabilities of previous models but which uses a training procedure based on the EM algorithm. We demonstrate the performance of the model on a toy problem and on data from flow diagnostics for a multiphase oil pipeline.

In the Poisson neuron model, the output is a rate-modulated Poisson process (Snyder and Miller, 1991); the time varying rate parameter ret) is an instantaneous function G[.] of the stimulus, ret) G[s(t)]. In a Poisson neuron, then, ret) gives the instantaneous firing rate-the instantaneous probability of firing at any instant t-and the output is a stochastic function of the input. In part because of its great simplicity, this model is widely used (usually with the addition of a refractory period), especially in in vivo single unit electrophysiological studies, where set) is usually taken to be the value of some sensory stimulus. In the integrate-and-fire neuron model, by contrast, the output is a filtered and thresholded function of the input: the input is passed through a low-pass filter (determined by the membrane time constant T) and integrated until the membrane potential vet) reaches threshold 8, at which point vet) is reset to its initial value. By contrast with the Poisson model, in the integrate-and-fire model the ouput is a deterministic function of the input. Although the integrate-and-fire model is a caricature of real neural dynamics, it captures many of the qualitative features, and is often used as a starting point for conceptualizing the biophysical behavior of single neurons.