We propose a new family of probabilistic description logics (DLs) that, in contrast to most existing approaches, are derived in a principled way from Halpern's probabilistic first-order logic. The resulting probabilistic DLs have a two-dimensional semantics similar to certain popular combinations of DLs with temporal logic and are well-suited for capturing subjective probabilities. Our main contribution is a detailed study of the complexity of reasoning in the new family of probabilistic DLs, showing that it ranges from PTime for weak variants based on the lightweight DL EL to undecidable for some expressive variants based on the DL ALC.

The satisfiability problem for monadic infinite-valued Gödel logic is known to be undecidable. We identify a fragment of this logic extended with strong negation whose satisfiability is not only decidable but it is decidable within classical logic. We use this fragment to formalize the rules of CADIAG-2, a well performing fuzzy expert system assisting in the differential diagnosis in internal medicine. A (classical) satisfiability check of the resulting formulas allowed the detection of some errors in the rules of the system.

Measuring the inconsistency degree of a knowledge base can help us to deal with inconsistencies. Several inconsistency measures have been given under different multi-valued semantics, including 4-valued semantics, 3-valued semantics, LPm and Quasi Classical semantics. In this paper, we first carefully analyze the relationship between these inconsistency measures by showing that the inconsistency degrees under 4-valued semantics, 3-value semantics, LPm are the same, but different from the one based on Quasi Classical semantics. We then consider the computation of these inconsistency measures and show that computing inconsistency measurement under multi-valued semantics is usually intractable. To tackle this problem, we propose two novel algorithms that respectively encode the problems of computing inconsistency degrees under 4-valued semantics (3-valued semantics, LPm) and under Quasi Classical semantics into the partial Max-SAT problems. We implement these algorithms and do experiments on some benchmark data sets. The preliminary but encouraging experimental results show that our approach is efficient to handle large knowledge bases.

We provide two approaches for explaining inconsistency in multi-context systems, where decentralized and heterogeneous system parts interact via nonmonotonic bridge rules. Inconsistencies arise easily in such scenarios, and nonmonotonicity calls for specific methods of inconsistency analysis. Both our approaches characterize inconsistency in terms of involved bridge rules: either by pointing out rules which need to be altered for restoring consistency, or by finding combinations of rules which cause inconsistency. We show duality and modularity properties, give precise complexity characterizations, and provide algorithms for computation using HEX-programs. Our results form a basis for inconsistency management in heterogeneous knowledge integration systems.

There is currently a growing interest in techniques for hiding parts of the signature of an ontology Kh that is being reused by another ontology Kv. Towards this goal, Cuenca Grau, Motik, and Kazakov (2009) recently proposed the import-by-query framework, which makes the content of Kh accessible through a limited query interface. If Kv reuses the symbols from Kh in a certain restricted way, one can reason over Kv U Kh by accessing only Kv and the query interface. In this paper, we map out the landscape of the import-by-query problem. We show that certain restrictions of our original framework are strictly necessary to make reasoning possible, we propose extensions that overcome some of the expressivity limitations, we present several novel reasoning algorithms, and we outline the limitations of the new framework.

Ontologies can be used to provide an enriched vocabulary for the formulation of queries over instance data. We identify query emptiness and predicate emptiness as two central reasoning services in this context. Query emptiness asks whether a given query has an empty answer over all data sets formulated in a given signature. Predicate emptiness is defined analogously, but quantifies universally over all queries that contain a given predicate. In this paper, we determine the computational complexity of query emptiness and predicate emptiness in the EL, DL-Lite, and ALC-families of description logics, investigate the connection to ontology modules, and perform a practical case study to evaluate the new reasoning services.

In this paper we introduce dialectical frameworks, a powerful generalization of Dung-style argumentation frameworks where each node comes with an associated acceptance condition. This allows us to model different types of dependencies, e.g. support and attack, as well as different types of nodes within a single framework. We show that Dung's standard semantics can be generalized to dialectical frameworks, in case of stable and preferred semantics to a slightly restricted class which we call bipolar frameworks. We show how acceptance conditions can be conveniently represented using weights respectively priorities on the links and demonstrate how some of the legal proof standards can be modeled based on this idea.

Sequential diagnosis takes measurements of an abnormal system to identify faulty components, where the goal is to reduce the diagnostic cost , defined here as the number of measurements. To propose measurement points, previous work employs a heuristic based on reducing the entropy over a set of diagnoses , which can be impractical when the set of diagnoses is too large. Focusing on a smaller set of probable diagnoses scales the approach but generally leads to increased diagnostic cost. We propose a new diagnostic framework employing three new techniques — a more efficient heuristic for measurement point selection, abstraction-based sequential diagnosis, and component cloning — which scales to large systems with good performance in terms of diagnostic cost.

The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma allows for the projection of $n$ points in $p-$dimensional Euclidean space onto a $k-$dimensional Euclidean space, with $k \ge \frac{24\ln \emph{n}}{3\epsilon^2-2\epsilon^3}$, so that the pairwise distances are preserved within a factor of $1\pm\epsilon$. Here, working directly with the distributions of the random distances rather than resorting to the moment generating function technique, an improvement on the lower bound for $k$ is obtained. The additional reduction in dimension when compared to bounds found in the literature, is at least $13\%$, and, in some cases, up to $30\%$ additional reduction is achieved. Using the moment generating function technique, we further provide a lower bound for $k$ using pairwise $L_2$ distances in the space of points to be projected and pairwise $L_1$ distances in the space of the projected points. Comparison with the results obtained in the literature shows that the bound presented here provides an additional $36-40\%$ reduction.

ECG Feature Extraction plays a significant role in diagnosing most of the cardiac diseases. One cardiac cycle in an ECG signal consists of the P-QRS-T waves. This feature extraction scheme determines the amplitudes and intervals in the ECG signal for subsequent analysis. The amplitudes and intervals value of P-QRS-T segment determines the functioning of heart of every human. Recently, numerous research and techniques have been developed for analyzing the ECG signal. The proposed schemes were mostly based on Fuzzy Logic Methods, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and other Signal Analysis techniques. All these techniques and algorithms have their advantages and limitations. This proposed paper discusses various techniques and transformations proposed earlier in literature for extracting feature from an ECG signal. In addition this paper also provides a comparative study of various methods proposed by researchers in extracting the feature from ECG signal.