In this paper we propose an ontological framework for tools facilitating creative writing and story reading. It is based on an ontology implemented as a topic map and employs linguistic analysis methods for discovering conceptual entities in the text.

Various strategies and techniques have been proposed for the generation of questions/answers tests in Intelligent Tutoring Systems by using OWL (Web Ontology Language) ontolo- gies. Currently there have been no known methods to utilize SWRL rules for this task. This paper presents a system and a set of strategies that can be used in order to automatically generate multiple choice questions from SWRL rules. The aim of the proposed framework is to support further research in the area and to be a testbed for the development of more advanced assessment techniques.

This allows for supporting more adequate and accurate representations of learners, their learning goals, learning material and contexts of its use, as well as more efficient access and navigation through learning resources. The goal is to advance intelligent educational systems, so as to achieve improved e-learning efficiency, flexibility and adaptation for single users and communities of users (learners, instructors, courseware authors, and others). The special track follows the workshop series Ontologies and Semantic Web for e-Learning, which was conducted successfully from 2002-2009 at a number of different conferences. The goals of this track are to discuss the current state-of-the-art in using ontologies and semantic web technologies in e-learning applications; and to attract the interest of the related research communities to the problems in the educational social semantic web and serve as an international platform for knowledge exchange and cooperation between researchers. This special track will be of interest to researchers interested in using ontologies, semantic web and social semantic web technologies in web-based educational systems, distributed hypermedia and open hypermedia systems, as well as in web intelligence and semantic web and social semantic web engineering.

In this paper, we present a Personalized Intelligent Tutoring System that uses Reinforcement Learning techniques to implicitly learn teaching rules and provide instructions to students based on their needs. The system works on coarsely labeled data with minimum expert knowledge to ease extension to newer domains.

In this work we hypothesize that giving students a reflective reading after spoken dialog tutoring in qualitative physics will improve learning. The reading is designed to help students compare similar aspects of previously tutored problems, and to abstract their commonalities. We also hypothesize that student motivation will affect how well the text is processed, and so influence learning. We find that the beneficial effects of the reflective text significantly interact with motivation, such that moderately motivated students learn significantly more from the reflective text than from a non-reflective control text. More poorly or highly motivated students did not benefit from reflective text. These results demonstrate that implicit reflection can improve learning after dialog tutoring with a qualitative physics tutor. They further demonstrate that this result can be obtained with a reflective/abstractive text without recourse to dialog, and that the effectiveness of the text is sensitive to the motivation level of the student.

An important aspect of Intelligent Tutoring Systems is providing assistance to students as well as assessing them. The standard state-of-the-art algorithms (Knowledge Tracing and Performance Factor Analysis) for tracking student knowledge, however, only look at the correctness of student first response and ignore the amount of assistance students needed to eventually answer the question correctly. In this paper, we propose the Assistance Model (AM) for predicting student performance using information about the number of hints and attempts a student needed to answer the previous question. We built ensemble models that combine the state-of-the-art algorithms and the Assistance Model together to see if the Assistance Model brings improvements. We used an ASSISTments dataset of 200 students answering a total of 4,142 questions generated from 207 question templates. Our results showed that the Assistance Model did in fact reliably increase predictive accuracy when combined with the state-of-the-art algorithms.

Research on automated essay scoring (AES) indicates that computer-generated essay ratings are comparable to human ratings. However, despite investigations into the accuracy and reliability of AES scores, less attention has been paid to the feedback delivered to the students. This paper presents a method developers can use to quickly evaluate the usability of an automated feedback system prior to testing with students. Using this method, researchers evaluated the feedback provided by the Writing-Pal, an intelligent tutor for writing strategies. Lessons learned and potential for future research are discussed.

Although freewriting strategies are commonly taught in composition courses, there have been few empirical studies on freewriting. We address this gap by examining effects of prior writing skills (as measured by a pre-write essay), freewriting training, text-box size (1, 10, 20 lines), and repetitive writing on freewriting quality. Participants watched an agent-based vicarious learning freewriting instruction video or a control video including brief instructions on freewriting. After training, participants wrote six freewrites, two in each box size. Lesson delivery and text box size did not affect expert human ratings of the freewrites. Furthermore, participants did not benefit from writing successive freewrites regardless of their initial skill level. We describe how these results have been used to inform the design of Writing-Pal, an essay-writing intelligent tutoring system.

Learners may develop expertise by experiencing numerous different but relevant situations. Computer games and virtual simulations can facilitate these training opportunities, however, because of the relative difficulty in authoring new scenarios, the increasing need for new and different scenarios becomes a bottleneck in the learning process. Furthermore, a one-size-fits-all scenario may not address all of the abilities, needs, or goals of a particular learner. To address these issues we present a novel technique, Automated Scenario Adaptation, to automatically “rewrite” narrative scenario content to suit individual learners’ needs and abilities and to incorporate recent changes from real world learning needs. Scenario adaptation acts as problem generation for intelligent tutoring systems, producing greater learning opportunities that facilitate engagement and continued learner involvement.

We examine a corpus of reflective tutorial dialogues between human tutor and student after the student completed introductory physics problems, to predict when the tutor abstracted from the student's preceding turn or when the tutor specialized from the student's preceding turn. Tutor abstraction occurs when the tutor repeats a segment of the student's turn using more general terms. Tutor specialization occurs when the tutor repeats a segment of the student's turn using more concrete terms. We find that features extracted from the reflective dialogue context produce the most predictive models. Also, the tutor abstracts more often when the student shows signs of working at a very detailed level for awhile, and prompts for specification when the student's responses are imprecise.