Industry
Invariant and Transportable Representations for Anti-Causal Domain Shifts and Victor Veitch Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago Department of Statistics, University of Chicago
Real-world classification problems must contend with domain shift, the (potential) mismatch between the domain where a model is deployed and the domain(s) where the training data was gathered. Methods to handle such problems must specify what structure is common between the domains and what varies. A natural assumption is that causal (structural) relationships are invariant in all domains. Then, it is tempting to learn a predictor for label Y that depends only on its causal parents. However, many real-world problems are "anti-causal" in the sense that Y is a cause of the covariates X--in this case, Y has no causal parents and the naive causal invariance is useless.
Supplementary Material
We provide more details of training the teacher network in Section A, more experimental results on synthetic functions in Section B, and the hyperparameter settings for benchmark datasets in Section C. Here, we omit the iteration subscript t for simplicity. To solve Eq. (10), we obtain the hypergradient regarding to and backpropagate it to = {W 2 R As shown in Algorithm 1, we train the teacher network one step when each time it is called by an underperforming student model, where the step refers to one iteration on synthetic functions and one epoch of the validation set on benchmark datasets in the experiment. In Section 4.1, we have shown the experimental results of HPM on two population synthetic functions, i.e., the Branin and Hartmann6D functions. In the following, we will provide more details about synthetic functions and the implementation, as well as more results on the other two functions. We used the Branin and Hartmann6D functions in Section 4.1.
OpenAI's Ambitions Just Became Crystal Clear
Sam Altman is done with keyboards and screens. Earlier today, OpenAI announced its intentions to solve this apparent problem. The company is partnering with Jony Ive, the longtime head of design at Apple, who did pioneering work on products such as the iMac G3, the iPod, and, most famously, the iPhone. Together, Altman and Ive say they want to create hardware built specifically for AI software. Everyone, Altman suggested in a highly produced announcement video, could soon have access to a "team of geniuses"--presumably, ChatGPT-style assistants--on a "family of devices."
The Image Local Autoregressive Transformer
Recently, AutoRegressive (AR) models for the whole image generation empowered by transformers have achieved comparable or even better performance compared to Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Unfortunately, directly applying such AR models to edit/change local image regions, may suffer from the problems of missing global information, slow inference speed, and information leakage of local guidance. To address these limitations, we propose a novel model - image Local Autoregressive Transformer (iLAT), to better facilitate the locally guided image synthesis. Our iLAT learns the novel local discrete representations, by the newly proposed local autoregressive (LA) transformer of the attention mask and convolution mechanism. Thus iLAT can efficiently synthesize the local image regions by key guidance information. Our iLAT is evaluated on various locally guided image syntheses, such as pose-guided person image synthesis and face editing. Both quantitative and qualitative results show the efficacy of our model.
Double Bubble, Toil and Trouble: Enhancing Certified Robustness through Transitivity Andrew C. Cullen 1 Paul Montague 2 Sarah M. Erfani 1
In response to subtle adversarial examples flipping classifications of neural network models, recent research has promoted certified robustness as a solution. There, invariance of predictions to all norm-bounded attacks is achieved through randomised smoothing of network inputs. Today's state-of-the-art certifications make optimal use of the class output scores at the input instance under test: no better radius of certification (under the L
Everything Unveiled at Google I/O 2025
See all the highlights from Google's annual 2025 Developers Conference in Mountain View, California. Check out the latest updates from Android XR to Gemini Live, and more. Topics Android Artificial Intelligence Google Google Gemini Latest Videos Everything Announced at AMD's 2025 Computex Keynote in 19 Minutes Watch highlights from AMD's Computex press conference. 1 hour ago By Mashable Video'Caught Stealing' trailer sees Zoรซ Kravitz and Austin Butler's cat-sitting gone awry Darren Aronofsky's swaggering new film looks like a rollicking time. Loading... Subscribe These newsletters may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. By clicking Subscribe, you confirm you are 16 and agree to ourTerms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Android XR Glasses Unveiled at Google I/O 2025
Topics Android Artificial Intelligence Google Google Gemini Latest Videos Everything Announced at AMD's 2025 Computex Keynote in 19 Minutes Watch highlights from AMD's Computex press conference. 1 hour ago By Mashable Video'Caught Stealing' trailer sees Zoรซ Kravitz and Austin Butler's cat-sitting gone awry Darren Aronofsky's swaggering new film looks like a rollicking time. Loading... Subscribe These newsletters may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. By clicking Subscribe, you confirm you are 16 and agree to ourTerms of Use and Privacy Policy. See you at your inbox! Mashable is a registered trademark of Ziff Davis and may not be used by third parties without express written permission.
Report: Creating a 5-second AI video is like running a microwave for an hour
You've probably heard that statistic that every search on ChatGPT uses the equivalent of a bottle of water. And while that's technically true, it misses some of the nuance. The MIT Technology Review dropped a massive report that reveals how the artificial intelligence industry uses energy -- and exactly how much energy it costs to use a service like ChatGPT. The report determined that the energy cost of large-language models like ChatGPT cost anywhere from 114 joules per response to 6,706 joules per response -- that's the difference between running a microwave for one-tenth of a second to running a microwave for eight seconds. The lower-energy models, according to the report, use less energy because they uses fewer parameters, which also means the answers tend to be less accurate.