Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Media



Machine Learning enables 3D printing stronger than injection moulding – DEVELOP3D

#artificialintelligence

Machine Learning capable of upgrading FDM 3D printed parts to such a level that they overtake their injection moulded counterparts.




Four Companies Offering Innovative Solutions Incorporating Artificial Intelligence for Retail … – IDC

#artificialintelligence

Innovations in AI apply new ways of applying intelligence algorithms and machine learning that can serve retail. "AI is becoming more and more of an …


MATT: A Multiple-instance Attention Mechanism for Long-tail Music Genre Classification

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Imbalanced music genre classification is a crucial task in the Music Information Retrieval (MIR) field for identifying the long-tail, data-poor genre based on the related music audio segments, which is very prevalent in real-world scenarios. Most of the existing models are designed for class-balanced music datasets, resulting in poor performance in accuracy and generalization when identifying the music genres at the tail of the distribution. Inspired by the success of introducing Multi-instance Learning (MIL) in various classification tasks, we propose a novel mechanism named Multi-instance Attention (MATT) to boost the performance for identifying tail classes. Specifically, we first construct the bag-level datasets by generating the album-artist pair bags. Second, we leverage neural networks to encode the music audio segments. Finally, under the guidance of a multi-instance attention mechanism, the neural network-based models could select the most informative genre to match the given music segment. Comprehensive experimental results on a large-scale music genre benchmark dataset with long-tail distribution demonstrate MATT significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art baselines.


Data Feedback Loops: Model-driven Amplification of Dataset Biases

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Datasets scraped from the internet have been critical to the successes of large-scale machine learning. Yet, this very success puts the utility of future internet-derived datasets at potential risk, as model outputs begin to replace human annotations as a source of supervision. In this work, we first formalize a system where interactions with one model are recorded as history and scraped as training data in the future. We then analyze its stability over time by tracking changes to a test-time bias statistic (e.g. gender bias of model predictions). We find that the degree of bias amplification is closely linked to whether the model's outputs behave like samples from the training distribution, a behavior which we characterize and define as consistent calibration. Experiments in three conditional prediction scenarios - image classification, visual role-labeling, and language generation - demonstrate that models that exhibit a sampling-like behavior are more calibrated and thus more stable. Based on this insight, we propose an intervention to help calibrate and stabilize unstable feedback systems. Code is available at https://github.com/rtaori/data_feedback.


Hidden Author Bias in Book Recommendation

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Collaborative filtering algorithms have the advantage of not requiring sensitive user or item information to provide recommendations. However, they still suffer from fairness related issues, like popularity bias. In this work, we argue that popularity bias often leads to other biases that are not obvious when additional user or item information is not provided to the researcher. We examine our hypothesis in the book recommendation case on a commonly used dataset with book ratings. We enrich it with author information using publicly available external sources. We find that popular books are mainly written by US citizens in the dataset, and that these books tend to be recommended disproportionally by popular collaborative filtering algorithms compared to the users' profiles. We conclude that the societal implications of popularity bias should be further examined by the scholar community.


Does Attention Mechanism Possess the Feature of Human Reading? A Perspective of Sentiment Classification Task

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

[Purpose] To understand the meaning of a sentence, humans can focus on important words in the sentence, which reflects our eyes staying on each word in different gaze time or times. Thus, some studies utilize eye-tracking values to optimize the attention mechanism in deep learning models. But these studies lack to explain the rationality of this approach. Whether the attention mechanism possesses this feature of human reading needs to be explored. [Design/methodology/approach] We conducted experiments on a sentiment classification task. Firstly, we obtained eye-tracking values from two open-source eye-tracking corpora to describe the feature of human reading. Then, the machine attention values of each sentence were learned from a sentiment classification model. Finally, a comparison was conducted to analyze machine attention values and eye-tracking values. [Findings] Through experiments, we found the attention mechanism can focus on important words, such as adjectives, adverbs, and sentiment words, which are valuable for judging the sentiment of sentences on the sentiment classification task. It possesses the feature of human reading, focusing on important words in sentences when reading. Due to the insufficient learning of the attention mechanism, some words are wrongly focused. The eye-tracking values can help the attention mechanism correct this error and improve the model performance. [Originality/value] Our research not only provides a reasonable explanation for the study of using eye-tracking values to optimize the attention mechanism, but also provides new inspiration for the interpretability of attention mechanism.


Outsmart your iPhone camera's overzealous AI

#artificialintelligence

Last weekend The New Yorker published an essay by Kyle Chayka with a headline guaranteed to pique my interest and raise my hackles: "Have iPhone Cameras Become Too Smart?" (March 18, 2022). Aside from being a prime example of Betteridge's Law of Headlines, it feeds into the idea that computational photography is a threat to photographers or is somehow ruining photography. The subhead renders the verdict in the way that eye-catching headlines do: "Apple's newest smartphone models use machine learning to make every image look professionally taken. That doesn't mean the photos are good." The implication there, and a thrust of the article, is that machine learning is creating bad images.