Recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL) have strengthened the reasoning capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs). However, enhancing policy exploration to better scale test-time compute remains largely underexplored. In addition, VLMs continue to struggle with imperfect visual perception, which in turn affects the subsequent reasoning process. We introduce NoisyRollout, a simple yet effective data augmentation method that addresses these issues by mixing training trajectories from both clean and moderately distorted images. This approach injects perceptual diversity, encouraging better policy exploration and leading to more robust reasoning. A noise annealing schedule gradually reduces distortion strength, aiding exploration early in training while ensuring later stability. Crucially, our method is easy-to-adopt--requiring no additional training cost and no modifications to the RL objective. Extensive experiments on 2distinct training datasets demonstrate that NoisyRollout achieves state-of-the-art performance among opensource RL-tuned models across 5 out-of-domain reasoning and perception benchmarks.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) face an inherent trade-off between faithfulness and creativity, as different tasks require varying degrees of associative reasoning. However, existing methods lack the flexibility to modulate this reasoning strength, limiting MLLMs' adaptability across factual and creative scenarios. To bridge this gap, we propose equipping MLLMs with mechanisms that enable flexible control over associative reasoning. We begin by investigating the internal mechanisms underlying associative behavior in MLLMs and find that: (1) middle layers play a pivotal role in shaping model's associative tendencies, (2) modifying representations in these layers effectively regulates associative reasoning strength, and (3) hallucinations can be exploited to derive steering vectors that guide this modulation. Building on these findings, we introduce Flexible Association Control (FlexAC), a lightweight and training-free framework for modulating associative behavior in MLLMs.

Concertgoer, 51, who plunged to his death in front of horrified wife at Madison Square Garden is identified as'much-loved' dad-of-two Jennifer Lopez enjoys concert night with Ben Affleck's child Fin and her own child Oskar CNN star Jake Tapper slammed for choice of guests for his Father's Day TV special: 'What the heck?' Call me cynical, but the real reason Gruesome Twosome Harry and Meghan are returning to the UK is just so obvious... and highly humiliating: MAUREEN CALLAHAN No one can see the real reason Jelly Roll divorced Bunnie XO. Family-man facade of award-winning children's swim coach is shattered by disturbing teen babysitter claims: Read all the vile texts How to boost your testosterone WITHOUT supplements or risky treatments: Jason, 56, doubled his levels with these simple lifestyle tweaks - and doctors say any man can do the same. Here's how to reap the benefits to your body AND sex life My secret sex fantasy is destroying my marriage. I'm repulsed by my husband... but can't bear to admit what I REALLY want: DEAR JANE Trump sparks confusion after sharing Father's Day photo of'mystery' woman while appearing to call her a'great daughter' Karoline Leavitt flaunts her postpartum body seven weeks after giving birth... and shares gushing tribute to husband, 60, for Father's Day I had sex with my brother.

Given a collection of monotone submodular functions, the goal of Two-Stage Submodular Maximization (2SSM) [Balkanski et al., 2016] is to restrict the ground set so an objective selected u.a.r.

Days after filing confidentially to go public, Anthropic, the $965 billion artificial intelligence juggernaut that's one of the fastest-growing startups of all time, dropped another bombshell. In a blog post, Anthropic suggested the world might benefit from a slowdown in development of the very technologies that have been minting cash for the company. Provided global peers agreed, and enforcement mechanisms could be set up, that would help societies deal with the "immense implications" of AI, it said. Critics have long accused Anthropic of "doom marketing" -- hyping its own products as so good that they're bad. But the post's co-author, who's also the company's co-founder, says the motive is very different. "We say this stuff because we think the world needs to know the truth about what's happening," Jack Clark, who now heads Anthropic's public benefit work, said in an interview.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has shown impressive capabilities in mitigating hallucinations in large language models (LLMs). However, LLMs struggle to maintain consistent reasoning when exposed to misleading or conflicting evidence, especially in real-world domains such as politics, where information is polarized or selectively framed. Mainstream RAG benchmarks evaluate models under clean retrieval settings, where systems generate answers from gold-standard documents, or under synthetically perturbed settings, where documents are artificially injected with noise. These assumptions fail to reflect real-world conditions, often leading to an overestimation of RAG system performance. To address this gap, we introduce \textsc{RAGuard}, the first benchmark to evaluate the robustness of RAG systems against \textit{misleading} retrievals. Unlike prior benchmarks that rely on synthetic noise, our fact-checking dataset captures naturally occurring misinformation by constructing its retrieval corpus from Reddit discussions. It categorizes retrieved evidence into three types: \textit{supporting}, \textit{misleading}, and \textit{unrelated}, providing a realistic and challenging testbed for assessing how well RAG systems navigate different types of evidence. Our experiments reveal that, when exposed to potentially misleading retrievals, all tested LLM-powered RAG systems perform worse than their zero-shot baselines (i.e., no retrieval at all), while human annotators consistently perform better, highlighting LLMs' susceptibility to noisy environments. To our knowledge, \textsc{RAGuard} is the first benchmark to systematically assess the robustness of the RAG against misleading evidence.We expect this benchmark to drive future research toward improving RAG systems beyond idealized datasets, making them more reliable for real-world applications.

Follow this section to personalize your feed and get instant alerts. Follow Go to your personalized feed WHY FOLLOW? Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens. Follow this tag to personalize your feed and get instant alerts. Follow Go to your personalized feed WHY FOLLOW? Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens.

We introduce CameraBench, a large-scale dataset and benchmark designed to assess and improve camera motion understanding. CameraBench consists of ~3,000 diverse internet videos, annotated by experts through a rigorous multi-stage quality control process. One of our core contributions is a taxonomy or language of camera motion primitives, designed in collaboration with cinematographers. We find, for example, that some motions like follow (or tracking) require understanding scene content like moving subjects. We conduct a large-scale human study to quantify human performance, revealing that domain expertise and tutorial-based training can significantly enhance accuracy. For example, a novice may confuse zoom-in (a change of intrinsics) with translating forward (a change of extrinsics), but can be trained to differentiate the two. Using CameraBench, we evaluate Structure-from-Motion (SfM) and Video-Language Models (VLMs), finding that SfM models struggle to capture semantic primitives that depend on scene content, while generative VLMs struggle to capture geometric primitives that require precise estimation of trajectories. We then fine-tune a generative VLM on CameraBench to achieve the best of both worlds and showcase its applications, including motion-augmented captioning, video question answering, and video-text retrieval. We hope our taxonomy, benchmark, and tutorials will drive future efforts towards the ultimate goal of understanding camera motions in any video.

This position paper argues that there is an urgent need to restructure markets for the information that goes into AI systems. Specifically, small-to-medium sized producers of information (such as journalists, news organizations, researchers, and creative professionals) need to be able to appoint representatives who can carry out collective bargaining with AI product builders in order to receive a reasonable terms and a fair return on the informational value they contribute. Obstacles to this market structure can be removed through technical work that facilitates collective bargaining in the information economy (e.g., explainable data value estimation and federated data management tools) and regulatory/policy interventions (e.g., support for trusted data intermediary organizations that represent guilds or syndicates of information producers). We argue that without collective bargaining in the information economy, AI will exacerbate a large-scale information market failure that will lead not only to undesirable concentration of capital, but also to a potential ecological collapse in the informational commons. On the other hand, collective bargaining in the information economy can create market conditions necessary for a pro-social AI future. We provide concrete actions that can be taken to support a coalition-based approach to achieve this.

An AI-designed universal vaccine targeting a broad range of coronaviruses passed its first clinical trial, proving safe and triggering an immune response in 39 healthy volunteers.