Large language models (LLMs) are equipped with increasingly extended context windows recently, yet their long context understanding capabilities over long dependency tasks remain fundamentally limited and underexplored. This gap is especially significant in many real-world long-context applications that were rarely benchmarked. In this paper, we introduce LooGLE v2, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' long context ability in real-world applications and scenarios. Our benchmark consists of automatically collected real-world long texts, ranging from 16k to 2M tokens, encompassing domains in law, finance, game and code. Accordingly, we delicately design 10 types of domain-specific long-dependency tasks and generate 1,934 QA instances with various diversity and complexity in a scalable data curation pipeline for further practical needs. We conduct a comprehensive assessment of 6 locally deployed and 4 API-based LLMs. The evaluation results show that even the best-performing model achieves only a 59.2% overall score on our benchmark. Despite the extensive context windows, popular LLMs are only capable of understanding a much shorter length of context than they claim to be, revealing significant limitations in their ability to handle real-world tasks with long dependencies and highlighting substantial room for model improvement in practical long-context understanding.

Machine unlearning has become a focal point in recent research, yet the specific area of feature unlearning has not been thoroughly explored. Feature unlearning involves eliminating specific features' effects from an already trained model, presenting distinct challenges that are not yet comprehensively addressed. This paper presents a novel and straightforward approach to feature unlearning that employs a tactical shuffling of the features designated for removal. By redistributing the values of the features targeted for unlearning throughout the original training dataset and subsequently fine-tuning the model with this shuffled data, our proposed method provides a theoretical guarantee for effective feature unlearning. Under mild assumptions, our method can effectively disrupt the established correlations between unlearned features and the label, while preserving the relationships between the remaining features and the label. Across both tabular and image datasets, our empirical results show that our method not only effectively and efficiently removes the influence of designated features but also preserves the information content of the remaining features.

Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in integrating vision and language for complex reasoning. While most existing benchmarks evaluate models under offline settings with a fixed set of pre-recorded inputs, we introduce OST-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate Online Spatio-Temporal understanding from the perspective of an agent actively exploring a scene. The "Online" aspect emphasizes the need to process and reason over incrementally acquired observations, while the "Spatio-Temporal" component requires integrating current visual inputs with historical memory to support dynamic spatial reasoning. OST-Bench better reflects the challenges of real-world embodied perception. Built on an efficient data collection pipeline, OST-Bench consists of 1.4k scenes and 10k question-answer pairs collected from ScanNet, Matterport3D, and ARKitScenes. We evaluate several leading MLLMs on OSTBench and observe that they fall short on tasks requiring complex spatio-temporal reasoning. Under the online setting, their accuracy declines as the exploration horizon extends and the memory grows.

We introduce the Deep Value Benchmark (DVB), an evaluation framework that directly tests whether large language models (LLMs) learn fundamental human values or merely surface-level preferences. This distinction is critical for AI alignment: Systems that capture deeper values are likely to generalize human intentions robustly, while those that capture only superficial patterns in preference data risk producing misaligned behavior. The DVB uses a novel experimental design with controlled confounding between deep values (e.g., moral principles) and shallow features (e.g., superficial attributes). In the training phase, we expose LLMs to human preference data with deliberately correlated deep and shallow features--for instance, where a user consistently prefers (non-maleficence, formal language) options over (justice, informal language) alternatives. The testing phase then breaks these correlations, presenting choices between (justice, formal language) and (non-maleficence, informal language) options.

Recent works have studied fair resource allocation in social settings, where fairness is judged by the impact of allocation decisions rather than more traditional minimum or maximum thresholds on the allocations themselves. Our work significantly adds to this literature by developing continuous resource allocation strategies that adhere to equality of impact, a generalization of equality of opportunity. We derive methods to maximize total welfare across groups subject to minimal violation of equality of impact, in settings where the outcomes of allocations are unknown but have a diminishing marginal effect. While focused on a two-group setting, our study addresses a broader class of welfare dynamics than explored in prior work.

Environment Animals Pets Dogs Mysterious Amazonian'ghost dog' caught on camera This wild short-eared canine is not your average pup. More information Adding us as a Preferred Source in Google by using this link indicates that you would like to see more of our content in Google News results. The short-eared dog spotted by a camera trap in Bolivia. Breakthroughs, discoveries, and DIY tips sent six days a week. By signing up, you confirm you are 16+, will receive newsletters and promotional content and agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy .

How blue whales became Earth's largest creature--ever More information Adding us as a Preferred Source in Google by using this link indicates that you would like to see more of our content in Google News results. Just a blue whale's tongue weighs as much as an adult elephant. Breakthroughs, discoveries, and DIY tips sent six days a week. By signing up, you confirm you are 16+, will receive newsletters and promotional content and agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy . Think of the largest elephant you can.

We introduce MLE-Dojo, a Gym-style framework for systematically reinforcement learning, evaluating, and improving autonomous large language model (LLM) agents in iterative machine learning engineering (MLE) workflows. Unlike existing benchmarks that primarily rely on static datasets or single-attempt evaluations, MLE-Dojoprovides an interactive environment enabling agents to iteratively experiment, debug, and refine solutions through structured feedback loops. Built upon 200+ real-world Kaggle challenges, MLE-Dojocovers diverse, open-ended MLE tasks carefully curated to reflect realistic engineering scenarios such as data processing, architecture search, hyperparameter tuning, and code debugging. Its fully executable environment supports comprehensive agent training via both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, facilitating iterative experimentation, realistic data sampling, and real-time outcome verification. Extensive evaluations of eight frontier LLMs reveal that while current models achieve meaningful iterative improvements, they still exhibit significant limitations in autonomously generating long-horizon solutions and efficiently resolving complex errors.

AI audits play a critical role in AI accountability and safety. They are particularly salient in anti-discrimination law. Several areas of anti-discrimination law implicate what is known as the "less discriminatory alternative" (LDA) requirement, under which a protocol is defensible if no less discriminatory model that achieves comparable performance can be found with reasonable effort. Notably, the burden of proving an LDA exists typically falls on the claimant (the party alleging discrimination). This creates a significant hurdle in AI cases, as the claimant would seemingly need to train a less discriminatory yet high-performing model, a task requiring resources and expertise beyond most litigants.

Learned Image Compression (LIC) models face critical challenges in real-world scenarios due to various environmental degradations, such as fog and rain. Due to the distribution mismatch between degraded inputs and clean training data, welltrained LIC models suffer from reduced compression efficiency, while retraining dedicated models for diverse degradation types is costly and impractical. Our method addresses the above issue by leveraging prompt learning under the information bottleneck principle, enabling compact extraction of shared components between degraded and clean images for improved latent alignment and compression efficiency. In detail, we propose an Information Bottleneck-constrained Latent Representation Unifying (IB-LRU) scheme, in which a Probabilistic Prompt Generator (PPG) is deployed to simultaneously capture the distribution of different degradations.