Land-use and land cover (LULC) analysis is critical in remote sensing, with wide-ranging applications across diverse fields such as agriculture, utilities, and urban planning. However, automating LULC map generation using machine learning is rendered challenging due to noisy labels. Typically, the ground truths (e.g. ESRI LULC, MapBioMass) have noisy labels that hamper the model's ability to learn to accurately classify the pixels. Further, these erroneous labels can significantly distort the performance metrics of a model, leading to misleading evaluations. Traditionally, the ambiguous labels are rectified using unsupervised algorithms. These algorithms struggle not only with scalability but also with generalization across different geographies. To overcome these challenges, we propose a zero-shot approach using the foundation model, Segment Anything Model (SAM), to automatically delineate different land parcels/regions and leverage them to relabel the unsure pixels by using the local label statistics within each detected region. We achieve a significant reduction in label noise and an improvement in the performance of the downstream segmentation model by $\approx 5\%$ when trained with denoised labels.

Could an AI have conscious experiences? Any answer to this question should conform to Evidentialism - that is, it should be based not on intuition, dogma or speculation but on solid scientific evidence. I argue that such evidence is hard to come by and that the only justifiable stance on the prospects of artificial consciousness is agnosticism. In the current debate, the main division is between biological views that are sceptical of artificial consciousness and functional views that are sympathetic to it. I argue that both camps make the same mistake of over-estimating what the evidence tells us. Scientific insights into consciousness have been achieved through the study of conscious organisms. Although this has enabled cautious assessments of consciousness in various creatures, extending this to AI faces serious obstacles. AI thus presents consciousness researchers with a dilemma: either reach a verdict on artificial consciousness but violate Evidentialism; or respect Evidentialism but offer no verdict on the prospects of artificial consciousness. The dominant trend in the literature has been to take the first option while purporting to follow the scientific evidence. I argue that if we truly follow the evidence, we must take the second option and adopt agnosticism.

Recent studies have raised significant concerns regarding the vulnerability of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) to maliciously injected or perturbed input images, which can mislead their responses. Existing defense methods show that such vision attacks are sensitive to image modifications especially cropping, using majority voting across responses of modified images as corrected responses. However, these modifications often result in partial images and distort the semantics, which reduces response quality on clean images after voting. Instead of directly using responses from partial images for voting, we investigate using them to supervise the LVLM's responses to the original images. We propose a black-box, training-free method called DPS (Defense through Partial-Perception Supervision). In this approach, the model is prompted using the responses generated by a model that perceives only a partial image. With DPS, the model can adjust its response based on partial image understanding when under attack, while confidently maintaining its original response for clean input. Our findings show that the weak model can supervise the strong model: when faced with an attacked input, the strong model becomes less confident and adjusts its response based on the weak model's partial understanding, effectively defending against the attack. With clean input, it confidently maintains its original response. Empirical experiments show our method outperforms the baseline, cutting the average attack success rate by 76.3% across six datasets on three popular models.

A narrative review is used to develop a theoretical evidence-based means-end framework to build an epistemic foundation to uphold explainable artificial intelligence instruments so that the reliability of outcomes generated from decision support systems can be assured and better explained to end-users. The implications of adopting an evidence-based approach to designing decision support systems in construction are discussed with emphasis placed on evaluating the strength, value, and utility of evidence needed to develop meaningful human explanations for end-users. While the developed means-end framework is focused on end-users, stakeholders can also utilize it to create meaningful human explanations. However, they will vary due to their different epistemic goals. Including evidence in the design and development of explainable artificial intelligence and decision support systems will improve decision-making effectiveness, enabling end-users' epistemic goals to be achieved. The proposed means-end framework is developed from a broad spectrum of literature. Thus, it is suggested that it can be used in construction and other engineering domains where there is a need to integrate evidence into the design of explainable artificial intelligence and decision support systems.

Recent advances in Generative AI technology have enabled new generations of product applications, such as text generation OpenAI (2023); Anthropic (2023); Dubey (2024), text-to-image generation Ramesh et al. (2021); Dai et al. (2023); Rombach et al. (2022), and text-to-video generation Meta (2024). Consequently, the pace of model development must be matched by the development of safety systems which are properly equipped to mitigate novel harms, ensuring the system's overall integrity and preventing the use of Generative AI products from being exploited by bad actors to disseminate misinformation, glorify violence, and proliferate sexual content Foundation (2023). To achieve this goal, traditional model fine-tuning approaches are often employed, with classifiers learning patterns from labeled content moderation text data leveraged as guardrails OpenAI (2023). However, there are many challenges associated with automating content moderation with fine-tuning. First, content moderation is a highly subjective task, meaning that inter-annotator agreement in labeled data is low, due to different interpretations of policy guidelines, especially on borderline cases Markov et al. (2023). Second, it is impossible to enforce a universal taxonomy of harm, not only due to the subjectivity of the task, but due to the impact of systems scaling to new locales, new audiences, and new use cases, with different guidelines and different gradients of harm defined on those guidelines Shen et al. (2024). Third, the fine-tuning development cycle, which encompasses data collection, annotation, and model experimentation, is not ideally suited to the content moderation domain, where mitigations must land as quickly as possible once vulnerabilities are established. To address these challenges of subjectivity and inflexibility as a result of scale, we propose a Classification approach to content moderation which employs Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Class-RAG) to add context to elicit reasoning for content classification. While RAG Lewis et al. (2020) is often used for knowledge-intensive tasks where factual citation is key, we find that a RAG-based solution offers a distinct value proposition for the classification task of content moderation, not only due to its ability to enhance accuracy with few-shot learning, but because of its ability to make real-time knowledge updates, which is critical in our domain for

Real-world decision-making often requires integrating and reasoning over information from multiple modalities. While recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown promise in such tasks, their ability to perform multi-hop reasoning across diverse sources remains insufficiently evaluated. Existing benchmarks, such as MMQA, face challenges due to (1) data contamination and (2) a lack of complex queries that necessitate operations across more than two modalities, hindering accurate performance assessment. To address this, we present Financial Cross-Modal Multi-Hop Reasoning (FCMR), a benchmark created to analyze the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs by urging them to combine information from textual reports, tables, and charts within the financial domain. FCMR is categorized into three difficulty levels-Easy, Medium, and Hard-facilitating a step-by-step evaluation. In particular, problems at the Hard level require precise cross-modal three-hop reasoning and are designed to prevent the disregard of any modality. Experiments on this new benchmark reveal that even state-of-the-art MLLMs struggle, with the best-performing model (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) achieving only 30.4% accuracy on the most challenging tier. We also conduct analysis to provide insights into the inner workings of the models, including the discovery of a critical bottleneck in the information retrieval phase.

Sudanese paramilitaries have attacked the city of el-Fasher killing at least 38 people, according to local activists, while international rights groups accuse the fighters of widespread sexual violence. The local resistance committee, a volunteer group coordinating aid in el-Fasher, said on Sunday that the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) targeted the centre of the capital of North Darfur state "with four high-explosive missiles". The massacre followed an earlier drone attack on the city's Saudi Hospital on Friday, which killed nine people and wounded 20, forcing doctors to halt operations. World Health Organization (WHO) chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus described attacks on healthcare facilities across Sudan as "deplorable" in a post on X on Saturday. The RSF and Sudan's army have been locked in a power struggle since mid-April 2023, creating one of the worst humanitarian crises, with tens of thousands killed and more than 11 million displaced.

Improving diesel engine efficiency and emission reduction have been critical research topics. Recent government regulations have shifted this focus to another important area related to engine health and performance monitoring. Although the advancements in the use of deep learning methods for system monitoring have shown promising results in this direction, designing efficient methods suitable for field systems remains an open research challenge. The objective of this study is to develop a computationally efficient neural network-based approach for identifying unknown parameters of a mean value diesel engine model to facilitate physics-based health monitoring and maintenance forecasting. We propose a hybrid method combining physics informed neural networks, PINNs, and a deep neural operator, DeepONet to predict unknown parameters and gas flow dynamics in a diesel engine. The operator network predicts independent actuator dynamics learnt through offline training, thereby reducing the PINNs online computational cost. To address PINNs need for retraining with changing input scenarios, we propose two transfer learning (TL) strategies. The first strategy involves multi-stage transfer learning for parameter identification. While this method is computationally efficient as compared to online PINN training, improvements are required to meet field requirements. The second TL strategy focuses solely on training the output weights and biases of a subset of multi-head networks pretrained on a larger dataset, substantially reducing computation time during online prediction. We also evaluate our model for epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty by incorporating dropout in pretrained networks and Gaussian noise in the training dataset. This strategy offers a tailored, computationally inexpensive, and physics-based approach for parameter identification in diesel engine sub systems.

As social systems become increasingly complex, legal articles are also growing more intricate, making it progressively harder for humans to identify any potential competitions among them, particularly when drafting new laws or applying existing laws. Despite this challenge, no method for detecting such competitions has been proposed so far. In this paper, we propose a new legal AI task called Legal Article Competition Detection (LACD), which aims to identify competing articles within a given law. Our novel retrieval method, CAM-Re2, outperforms existing relevant methods, reducing false positives by 20.8% and false negatives by 8.3%, while achieving a 98.2% improvement in precision@5, for the LACD task. We release our codes at https://github.com/asmath472/LACD-public.

WARNING: This paper contains content that maybe upsetting or offensive to some readers. Dog whistles are coded expressions with dual meanings: one intended for the general public (outgroup) and another that conveys a specific message to an intended audience (ingroup). Often, these expressions are used to convey controversial political opinions while maintaining plausible deniability and slip by content moderation filters. Identification of dog whistles relies on curated lexicons, which have trouble keeping up to date. We introduce \textbf{FETCH!}, a task for finding novel dog whistles in massive social media corpora. We find that state-of-the-art systems fail to achieve meaningful results across three distinct social media case studies. We present \textbf{EarShot}, a novel system that combines the strengths of vector databases and Large Language Models (LLMs) to efficiently and effectively identify new dog whistles.