Variational mutual information (MI) estimators are widely used in unsupervised representation learning methods such as contrastive predictive coding (CPC). A lower bound on MI can be obtained from a multi-class classification problem, where a critic attempts to distinguish a positive sample drawn from the underlying joint distribution from (m-1) negative samples drawn from a suitable proposal distribution. Using this approach, MI estimates are bounded above by \log m, and could thus severely underestimate unless m is very large. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a novel estimator based on a multi-label classification problem, where the critic needs to jointly identify \emph{multiple} positive samples at the same time. We show that using the same amount of negative samples, multi-label CPC is able to exceed the \log m bound, while still being a valid lower bound of mutual information.

Privacy in machine learning has been widely recognized as an essential ethical and legal issue, because the data used for machine learning may contain sensitive information. Homomorphic encryption has recently attracted attention as a key solution to preserve privacy in machine learning applications. However, current approaches on the training of encrypted machine learning have relied heavily on hyperparameter selection, which should be avoided owing to the extreme difficulty of conducting validation on encrypted data. In this study, we propose an effective privacy-preserving logistic regression method that is free from the approximation of the sigmoid function and hyperparameter selection. In our framework, a logistic regression model can be transformed into the corresponding ridge regression for the logit function. We provide a theoretical background for our framework by suggesting a new generalization error bound on the encrypted data.

Federated Edge Learning (FEL), an emerging distributed Machine Learning (ML) paradigm, enables model training in a distributed environment while ensuring user privacy by using physical separation for each user data. However, with the development of complex application scenarios such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and Smart Earth, the conventional resource allocation schemes can no longer effectively support these growing computational and communication demands. Therefore, joint resource optimization may be the key solution to the scaling problem. This paper simultaneously addresses the multifaceted challenges of computation and communication, with the growing multiple resource demands. We systematically review the joint allocation strategies for different resources (computation, data, communication, and network topology) in FEL, and summarize the advantages in improving system efficiency, reducing latency, enhancing resource utilization and enhancing robustness. In addition, we present the potential ability of joint optimization to enhance privacy preservation by reducing communication requirements, indirectly. This work not only provides theoretical support for resource management in federated learning (FL) systems, but also provides ideas for potential optimal deployment in multiple real-world scenarios. By thoroughly discussing the current challenges and future research directions, it also provides some important insights into multi-resource optimization in complex application environments.

The research was partially supported by the Paul and Marcia Wythes Center on Contemporary China and Office of Population Research at Princeton University. We are grateful to Wen Liu, Gou Wu, and Dean Minello for their excellent research assistance. The ideas expressed herein are those of the authors. Abstract Liking it or not, ready or not, we are likely to enter a new phase of human history in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) will dominate economic production and social life - the AI Revolution. Before the actual arrival of the AI Revolution, it is time for us to speculate on how AI will impact the social world. In this article, we focus on the social impact of generative LLMbased AI (GELLMAI), discussing societal factors that contribute to its technological development and its potential roles in enhancing both between-country and within-country social inequality. There are good indications that the US and China will lead the field and will be the main competitors for domination of AI in the world. We conjecture the AI Revolution will likely give rise to a post-knowledge society in which knowledge per se will become less important than in today's world. Instead, individual relationships and social identity will become more important. With the advent of Generative Large Language Model (LLM)-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT from OpenAI and Bard from Google, it is natural to wonder about the social impact of this technology. In the remainder of this paper, we will refer to generative LLMbased AI simply as GELLMAI. The main objective of this paper is to explore, tentatively, the social impact of GELLMAI. While the question about the social impact of GELLMAI is undoubtedly important, any answers must be tentative and speculative at this point. We are still in the early stages of GELLMAI and may need to wait years, perhaps even decades, to fully understand its social implications. However, drawing from our experiences with past technologies in history, our current understanding of GELLMAI, empirical knowledge about the social world, and sociological reasoning, we can engage in preliminary and speculative discussions. We offer our account below. We believe that the social impact of GELLMAI is enormous, with the potential to revolutionize not only the production of goods and services but also to fundamentally alter the organization of human societies and the nature of daily life.

This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on evaluation criteria for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (TAI), with a focus on the seven EU principles of TAI. This systematic literature review identifies and analyses current evaluation criteria, maps them to the EU TAI principles and proposes a new classification system for each principle. The findings reveal both a need for and significant barriers to standardising criteria for TAI evaluation. The proposed classification contributes to the development, selection and standardization of evaluation criteria for TAI governance.

Automatic refinement of patent claims in patent applications is crucial from the perspective of intellectual property strategy. In this paper, we propose ClaimBrush, a novel framework for automated patent claim refinement that includes a dataset and a rewriting model. We constructed a dataset for training and evaluating patent claim rewriting models by collecting a large number of actual patent claim rewriting cases from the patent examination process. Using the constructed dataset, we built an automatic patent claim rewriting model by fine-tuning a large language model. Furthermore, we enhanced the performance of the automatic patent claim rewriting model by applying preference optimization based on a prediction model of patent examiners' Office Actions. The experimental results showed that our proposed rewriting model outperformed heuristic baselines and zero-shot learning in state-of-the-art large language models. Moreover, preference optimization based on patent examiners' preferences boosted the performance of patent claim refinement.

The objective of this paper is to leverage insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which primarily focus on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence, to critically examine the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act). In the context of AT research, several key failure modes - such as proxy gaming, goal drift, reward hacking or specification gaming - have been identified. These can arise when AI systems are not properly aligned with their intended objectives. The central logic of this report is: what can we learn if we treat regulatory efforts in the same way as we treat advanced AI systems? By applying these concepts to the EU AI Act, this project uncovers potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation, ensuring it effectively addresses the complexities and risks associated with AI technologies.

The emerging field of AI-generated art has witnessed the rise of prompt marketplaces, where creators can purchase, sell, or share prompts for generating unique artworks. These marketplaces often assert ownership over prompts, claiming them as intellectual property. This paper investigates whether concealed prompts sold on prompt marketplaces can be considered as secure intellectual property, given that humans and AI tools may be able to approximately infer the prompts based on publicly advertised sample images accompanying each prompt on sale. Specifically, our survey aims to assess (i) how accurately can humans infer the original prompt solely by examining an AI-generated image, with the goal of generating images similar to the original image, and (ii) the possibility of improving upon individual human and AI prompt inferences by crafting human-AI combined prompts with the help of a large language model. Although previous research has explored the use of AI and machine learning to infer (and also protect against) prompt inference, we are the first to include humans in the loop. Our findings indicate that while humans and human-AI collaborations can infer prompts and generate similar images with high accuracy, they are not as successful as using the original prompt.

We develop four versions of GreekLegalRoBERTa, which are four large language models trained on Greek legal and nonlegal text. We show that our models surpass the performance of GreekLegalBERT, Greek- LegalBERT-v2, and GreekBERT in two tasks involving Greek legal documents: named entity recognition and multi-class legal topic classification. We view our work as a contribution to the study of domain-specific NLP tasks in low-resource languages, like Greek, using modern NLP techniques and methodologies.

Smart vehicles produce large amounts of data, much of which is sensitive and at risk of privacy breaches. As attackers increasingly exploit anonymised metadata within these datasets to profile drivers, it's important to find solutions that mitigate this information leakage without hindering innovation and ongoing research. Synthetic data has emerged as a promising tool to address these privacy concerns, as it allows for the replication of real-world data relationships while minimising the risk of revealing sensitive information. In this paper, we examine the use of synthetic data to tackle these challenges. We start by proposing a comprehensive taxonomy of 14 in-vehicle sensors, identifying potential attacks and categorising their vulnerability. We then focus on the most vulnerable signals, using the Passive Vehicular Sensor (PVS) dataset to generate synthetic data with a Tabular Variational Autoencoder (TVAE) model, which included over 1 million data points. Finally, we evaluate this against 3 core metrics: fidelity, utility, and privacy. Our results show that we achieved 90.1% statistical similarity and 78% classification accuracy when tested on its original intent while also preventing the profiling of the driver. The code can be found at https://github.com/krish-parikh/Synthetic-Data-Generation