Expert-driven frameworks for impact assessments (IAs) may inadvertently overlook the effects of AI technologies on the public's social behavior, policy, and the cultural and geographical contexts shaping the perception of AI and the impacts around its use. This research explores the potentials of fine-tuning LLMs on negative impacts of AI reported in a diverse sample of articles from 266 news domains spanning 30 countries around the world to incorporate more diversity into IAs. Our findings highlight (1) the potential of fine-tuned open-source LLMs in supporting IA of AI technologies by generating high-quality negative impacts across four qualitative dimensions: coherence, structure, relevance, and plausibility, and (2) the efficacy of small open-source LLM (Mistral-7B) fine-tuned on impacts from news media in capturing a wider range of categories of impacts that GPT-4 had gaps in covering.

The EcoCropsAID dataset is a comprehensive collection of 5,400 aerial images captured between 2014 and 2018 using the Google Earth application. This dataset focuses on five key economic crops in Thailand: rice, sugarcane, cassava, rubber, and longan. The images were collected at various crop growth stages: early cultivation, growth, and harvest, resulting in significant variability within each category and similarities across different categories. These variations, coupled with differences in resolution, color, and contrast introduced by multiple remote imaging sensors, present substantial challenges for land use classification. The dataset is an interdisciplinary resource that spans multiple research domains, including remote sensing, geoinformatics, artificial intelligence, and computer vision. The unique features of the EcoCropsAID dataset offer opportunities for researchers to explore novel approaches, such as extracting spatial and temporal features, developing deep learning architectures, and implementing transformer-based models. The EcoCropsAID dataset provides a valuable platform for advancing research in land use classification, with implications for optimizing agricultural practices and enhancing sustainable development. This study explicitly investigates the use of deep learning algorithms to classify economic crop areas in northeastern Thailand, utilizing satellite imagery to address the challenges posed by diverse patterns and similarities across categories.

For example, hundreds of millions of people utilize Twitter [22], Facebook [45, 46, 50], and Weibo [66] to record life events, express personal thoughts and opinions, and interact with friends every day. The openness of social media provides a spacious environment for content sharing while resulting in the disclosure of toxic content (toxicity), defined as "a rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is likely to make someone leave a discussion" [1], including hate speech [24], harassment [8, 22], insults and abuse [5], and offensive language [14], etc. Since the severe problem of context collapse [38], social media users are usually unaware of the disclosure of toxic content. For example, the prior studies [31, 36] found that about two-thirds of toxic content was implicit toxicity in online communities and the corresponding users were usually unaware of the content and the harm to others. Research revealed that 23.00% of users regret when they re-examine their shared content due to several reasons [58], such as lack of the consequence consideration of posts, culture misjudgment, unintended audience, misunderstanding of platform norms. To avoid toxic content disclosure, social media users generally conduct content censorship before publishing a post. The censorship procedure can be implemented by users themselves or by leveraging some automated tools. For example, several studies have found that individuals usually censored their content by checking, adjusting, or even deleting part of the content to make the content suitable to be published on social media [62]. Although there have been various censorship approaches, most of them focus on toxic content detection, e.g., toxicity score evaluation with Perspective

We introduce Constrained Human-AI Cooperation (CHAIC), an inclusive embodied social intelligence challenge designed to test social perception and cooperation in embodied agents. In CHAIC, the goal is for an embodied agent equipped with egocentric observations to assist a human who may be operating under physical constraints -- e.g., unable to reach high places or confined to a wheelchair -- in performing common household or outdoor tasks as efficiently as possible. To achieve this, a successful helper must: (1) infer the human's intents and constraints by following the human and observing their behaviors (social perception), and (2) make a cooperative plan tailored to the human partner to solve the task as quickly as possible, working together as a team (cooperative planning). To benchmark this challenge, we create four new agents with real physical constraints and eight long-horizon tasks featuring both indoor and outdoor scenes with various constraints, emergency events, and potential risks. We benchmark planning- and learning-based baselines on the challenge and introduce a new method that leverages large language models and behavior modeling. Empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of our benchmark in enabling systematic assessment of key aspects of machine social intelligence. Our benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/UMass-Foundation-Model/CHAIC.

In this report, we argue that there is a realistic possibility that some AI systems will be conscious and/or robustly agentic in the near future. That means that the prospect of AI welfare and moral patienthood -- of AI systems with their own interests and moral significance -- is no longer an issue only for sci-fi or the distant future. It is an issue for the near future, and AI companies and other actors have a responsibility to start taking it seriously. We also recommend three early steps that AI companies and other actors can take: They can (1) acknowledge that AI welfare is an important and difficult issue (and ensure that language model outputs do the same), (2) start assessing AI systems for evidence of consciousness and robust agency, and (3) prepare policies and procedures for treating AI systems with an appropriate level of moral concern. To be clear, our argument in this report is not that AI systems definitely are -- or will be -- conscious, robustly agentic, or otherwise morally significant. Instead, our argument is that there is substantial uncertainty about these possibilities, and so we need to improve our understanding of AI welfare and our ability to make wise decisions about this issue. Otherwise there is a significant risk that we will mishandle decisions about AI welfare, mistakenly harming AI systems that matter morally and/or mistakenly caring for AI systems that do not.

As modern AI models become integral to everyday tasks, concerns about their inherent biases and their potential impact on human decision-making have emerged. While bias in models are well-documented, less is known about how these biases influence human decisions. This paper presents two interactive experiments investigating the effects of partisan bias in AI language models on political decision-making. Participants interacted freely with either a biased liberal, biased conservative, or unbiased control model while completing political decision-making tasks. We found that participants exposed to politically biased models were significantly more likely to adopt opinions and make decisions aligning with the AI's bias, regardless of their personal political partisanship. However, we also discovered that prior knowledge about AI could lessen the impact of the bias, highlighting the possible importance of AI education for robust bias mitigation. Our findings not only highlight the critical effects of interacting with biased AI and its ability to impact public discourse and political conduct, but also highlights potential techniques for mitigating these risks in the future.

"Designed to be deleted" is the tagline of one of the UK's most popular dating apps. Hinge promises that it is "the dating app for people who want to get off dating apps" – the place to find lasting love. But critics say modern dating is in crisis. They claim that dating apps, which have been downloaded hundreds of millions of times worldwide, are "exploitative" and are designed not to be deleted but to be addictive, to retain users in order to create revenue. An Observer investigation has found that dating apps are increasingly pushing users to buy extras that have been likened to "gambling products" and can cost hundreds of pounds a year.

A significant challenge in automating hate speech detection on social media is distinguishing hate speech from regular and offensive language. These identify an essential category of content that web filters seek to remove. Only automated methods can manage this volume of daily data. To solve this problem, the community of Natural Language Processing is currently investigating different ways of hate speech detection. In addition to those, previous approaches (e.g., Convolutional Neural Networks, multi-channel BERT models, and lexical detection) have always achieved low precision without carefully treating other related tasks like sentiment analysis and emotion classification. They still like to group all messages with specific words in them as hate speech simply because those terms often appear alongside hateful rhetoric. In this research, our paper presented the hate speech text classification system model drawn upon deep learning and machine learning. In this paper, we propose a new multitask model integrated with shared emotional representations to detect hate speech across the English language. The Transformer-based model we used from Hugging Face and sentiment analysis helped us prevent false positives. Conclusion. We conclude that utilizing sentiment analysis and a Transformer-based trained model considerably improves hate speech detection across multiple datasets.

Prior study shows that LLMs sometimes generate content that violates copyright. In this paper, we study another important yet underexplored problem, i.e., will LLMs respect copyright information in user input, and behave accordingly? The research problem is critical, as a negative answer would imply that LLMs will become the primary facilitator and accelerator of copyright infringement behavior. We conducted a series of experiments using a diverse set of language models, user prompts, and copyrighted materials, including books, news articles, API documentation, and movie scripts. Our study offers a conservative evaluation of the extent to which language models may infringe upon copyrights when processing user input containing protected material. This research emphasizes the need for further investigation and the importance of ensuring LLMs respect copyright regulations when handling user input to prevent unauthorized use or reproduction of protected content. We also release a benchmark dataset serving as a test bed for evaluating infringement behaviors by LLMs and stress the need for future alignment.

Employee attrition poses significant costs for organizations, with traditional statistical prediction methods often struggling to capture modern workforce complexities. Machine learning (ML) advancements offer more scalable and accurate solutions, but large language models (LLMs) introduce new potential in human resource management by interpreting nuanced employee communication and detecting subtle turnover cues. This study leverages the IBM HR Analytics Attrition dataset to compare the predictive accuracy and interpretability of a fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model against traditional ML classifiers, including Logistic Regression, k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, and XGBoost. While traditional models are easier to use and interpret, LLMs can reveal deeper patterns in employee behavior. Our findings show that the fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model outperforms traditional methods with a precision of 0.91, recall of 0.94, and an F1-score of 0.92, while the best traditional model, SVM, achieved an F1-score of 0.82, with Random Forest and XGBoost reaching 0.80. These results highlight GPT-3.5's ability to capture complex patterns in attrition risk, offering organizations improved insights for retention strategies and underscoring the value of LLMs in HR applications.