For years, so-called "nudify" apps and websites have mushroomed online, allowing people to create nonconsensual and abusive images of women and girls, including child sexual abuse material. Despite some lawmakers and tech companies taking steps to limit the harmful services, every month, millions of people are still accessing the websites, and the sites' creators may be making millions of dollars each year, new research suggests. An analysis of 85 nudify and "undress" websites--which allow people to upload photos and use AI to generate "nude" pictures of the subjects with just a few clicks--has found that most of the sites rely on tech services from Google, Amazon, and Cloudflare to operate and stay online. The findings, revealed by Indicator, a publication investigating digital deception, say that the websites had a combined average of 18.5 million visitors for each of the past six months and collectively may be making up to 36 million per year. Alexios Mantzarlis, a cofounder of Indicator and an online safety researcher, says the murky nudifier ecosystem has become a "lucrative business" that "Silicon Valley's laissez-faire approach to generative AI" has allowed to persist.

Decision conferences are structured, collaborative meetings that bring together experts from various fields to address complex issues and reach a consensus on recommendations for future actions or policies. These conferences often rely on facilitated discussions to ensure productive dialogue and collective agreement. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant promise in simulating real-world scenarios, particularly through collaborative multi-agent systems that mimic group interactions. In this work, we present a novel LLM-based multi-agent system designed to simulate decision conferences, specifically focusing on detecting agreement among the participant agents. To achieve this, we evaluate six distinct LLMs on two tasks: stance detection, which identifies the position an agent takes on a given issue, and stance polarity detection, which identifies the sentiment as positive, negative, or neutral. These models are further assessed within the multi-agent system to determine their effectiveness in complex simulations. Our results indicate that LLMs can reliably detect agreement even in dynamic and nuanced debates. Incorporating an agreement-detection agent within the system can also improve the efficiency of group debates and enhance the overall quality and coherence of deliberations, making them comparable to real-world decision conferences regarding outcome and decision-making. These findings demonstrate the potential for LLM-based multi-agent systems to simulate group decision-making processes. They also highlight that such systems could be instrumental in supporting decision-making with expert elicitation workshops across various domains.

Flooding remains a major global challenge, worsened by climate change and urbanization, demanding advanced solutions for effective disaster management. While traditional 2D flood mapping techniques provide limited insights, 3D flood mapping, powered by deep learning (DL), offers enhanced capabilities by integrating flood extent and depth. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of deep learning-based 3D flood mapping, emphasizing its advancements over 2D maps by integrating flood extent and depth for effective disaster management and urban planning. The survey categorizes deep learning techniques into task decomposition and end-to-end approaches, applicable to both static and dynamic flood features. We compare key DL architectures, highlighting their respective roles in enhancing prediction accuracy and computational efficiency. Additionally, this work explores diverse data sources such as digital elevation models, satellite imagery, rainfall, and simulated data, outlining their roles in 3D flood mapping. The applications reviewed range from real-time flood prediction to long-term urban planning and risk assessment. However, significant challenges persist, including data scarcity, model interpretability, and integration with traditional hydrodynamic models. This survey concludes by suggesting future directions to address these limitations, focusing on enhanced datasets, improved models, and policy implications for flood management. This survey aims to guide researchers and practitioners in leveraging DL techniques for more robust and reliable 3D flood mapping, fostering improved flood management strategies.

Current efforts in AI safety prioritize filtering harmful content, preventing manipulation of human behavior, and eliminating existential risks in cybersecurity or biosecurity. While pressing, this narrow focus overlooks critical human-centric considerations that shape the long-term trajectory of a society. In this position paper, we identify the risks of overlooking the impact of AI on the future of work and recommend comprehensive transition support towards the evolution of meaningful labor with human agency. Through the lens of economic theories, we highlight the intertemporal impacts of AI on human livelihood and the structural changes in labor markets that exacerbate income inequality. Additionally, the closed-source approach of major stakeholders in AI development resembles rent-seeking behavior through exploiting resources, breeding mediocrity in creative labor, and monopolizing innovation. To address this, we argue in favor of a robust international copyright anatomy supported by implementing collective licensing that ensures fair compensation mechanisms for using data to train AI models. We strongly recommend a pro-worker framework of global AI governance to enhance shared prosperity and economic justice while reducing technical debt.

Proto-personas are commonly used during early-stage Product Discovery, such as Lean Inception, to guide product definition and stakeholder alignment. However, the manual creation of proto-personas is often time-consuming, cognitively demanding, and prone to bias. In this paper, we propose and empirically investigate a prompt engineering-based approach to generate proto-personas with the support of Generative AI (GenAI). Our goal is to evaluate the approach in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, user acceptance, and the empathy elicited by the generated personas. We conducted a case study with 19 participants embedded in a real Lean Inception, employing a qualitative and quantitative methods design. The results reveal the approach's efficiency by reducing time and effort and improving the quality and reusability of personas in later discovery phases, such as Minimum Viable Product (MVP) scoping and feature refinement. While acceptance was generally high, especially regarding perceived usefulness and ease of use, participants noted limitations related to generalization and domain specificity. Furthermore, although cognitive empathy was strongly supported, affective and behavioral empathy varied significantly across participants. These results contribute novel empirical evidence on how GenAI can be effectively integrated into software Product Discovery practices, while also identifying key challenges to be addressed in future iterations of such hybrid design processes.

This paper provides an experimental evaluation of the capability of large language models (LLMs) to assist in legal decision-making within the framework of Austrian and European Union value-added tax (VAT) law. In tax consulting practice, clients often describe cases in natural language, making LLMs a prime candidate for supporting automated decision-making and reducing the workload of tax professionals. Given the requirement for legally grounded and well-justified analyses, the propensity of LLMs to hallucinate presents a considerable challenge. The experiments focus on two common methods for enhancing LLM performance: fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). In this study, these methods are applied on both textbook cases and real-world cases from a tax consulting firm to systematically determine the best configurations of LLM-based systems and assess the legal-reasoning capabilities of LLMs. The findings highlight the potential of using LLMs to support tax consultants by automating routine tasks and providing initial analyses, although current prototypes are not ready for full automation due to the sensitivity of the legal domain. The findings indicate that LLMs, when properly configured, can effectively support tax professionals in VAT tasks and provide legally grounded justifications for decisions. However, limitations remain regarding the handling of implicit client knowledge and context-specific documentation, underscoring the need for future integration of structured background information.

Language models are prone to hallucination - generating text that is factually incorrect. Finetuning models on high-quality factual information can potentially reduce hallucination, but concerns remain; obtaining factual gold data can be expensive and training on correct but unfamiliar data may potentially lead to even more downstream hallucination. What data should practitioners finetune on to mitigate hallucinations in language models? In this work, we study the relationship between the factuality of finetuning data and the prevalence of hallucinations in long-form generation tasks. Counterintuitively, we find that finetuning on factual gold data is not as helpful as finetuning on model-generated data that models believe to be factual. Next, we evaluate filtering strategies applied on both factual gold data and model-generated data, and find that finetuning on model-generated data that is filtered by models' own internal judgments often leads to better overall factuality compared to other configurations: training on gold data filtered by models' judgments, training on gold data alone, or training on model-generated data that is supported by gold data. These factuality improvements transfer across three domains we study, suggesting that a models' own beliefs can provide a powerful signal for factuality.

The Patent-Based Idea Generation task asks systems to turn real patents into product ideas viable within three years. We propose MK2, a prompt-centric pipeline: Gemini 2.5 drafts and iteratively edits a prompt, grafting useful fragments from weaker outputs; GPT-4.1 then uses this prompt to create one idea per patent, and an Elo loop judged by Qwen3-8B selects the best prompt-all without extra training data. Across three domains, two evaluator types, and six criteria, MK2 topped the automatic leaderboard and won 25 of 36 tests. Only the materials-chemistry track lagged, indicating the need for deeper domain grounding; yet, the results show that lightweight prompt engineering has already delivered competitive, commercially relevant ideation from patents.

Contemporary organizations have shown great interest in integrating language models (LMs) into workflows traditionally performed by human subject matter experts (SMEs), such as in medical diagnostics (Artsi et al., 2025), legal assistance (Padiu et al., 2024), financial risk analysis (AI21 labs, 2025), and governmental permitting or regulatory reviews (Phan et al., 2024). Despite this interest, however, the use of LMs (e.g., via a standard conversational interface) in high-stakes contexts is constrained by the need for decision-making reliability, objectivity, transparency, and accountability that SMEs currently provide (Mori, 2024). Effective reconciliation between LMs and SMEs thus represents a critical frontier in real-world deployments of artificial intelligence. LMs have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in extracting information from large volumes of multi-modal, multi-domain data; synthesizing multi-document concepts; and performing tasks associated with basic reasoning. Nonetheless, LMs are susceptible to "hallucinations" (i.e., inaccurate generation) (Ji et al., 2023), difficulty in handling nuanced, domain-specific requirements (Ashqar, 2025), historical biases inherited from training data (Ranjan et al., 2024), and opaque reasoning in decision-making (Machot et al., 2024). Notably, these weaknesses are often precisely the strengths of SMEs, who are conversely burdened with the inefficient and labor-intensive tasks of cross-document, multi-modal search and information extraction. We can see the need to delineate and integrate the often low-stakes or tedious work that can be performed by LMs with the discerning, high-stakes decision-making tasks performed by SMEs in the real world: The challenge is to harness the time efficiency and broad knowledge capabilities of LMs while preserving the domain expertise, contextual judgment, oversight, and accountability of SMEs. Moreover, we must do so without creating additional burdens for SMEs to work with LMs (e.g., "prompt-engineering" or manual review of all LM tasks), and we wish to minimize the introduction of new risks (e.g., a loss of clarity regarding where or how LMs may be used by each SME, or, in the case of governmental work, the erosion of public trust). In this work, we propose a novel auditable and interactive refinement framework for the effective integration of LMs with SMEs for decision-making workflows.

"Amazing, They All Lean Left" - Analyzing the Political Temperaments of Current LLMs Abstract Recent studies have revealed a consistent liberal orientation in the ethical and political responses generated by most commercial large language models (LLMs), yet the underlying causes and resulting implications remain unclear. This paper systematically i nvestigates the political temperament of seven prominent LLMs -- OpenAI's GPT - 4o, Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4, Perplexity (Sonar Large), Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash, Meta AI's L l a ma 4, Mistral 7b Le Chat, and High - Flyer ' s DeepSeek R1 -- using a multi - pronged approach that incl udes Moral Foundations Theory, a dozen established political ideology scales, and a new index of current political controversies. We find strong and consistent prioritization of liberal - leaning values, particularly care and fairness, across most models. Fur ther analysis attributes this trend to four overlapping factors: liberal - leaning training corpora, reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), the dominance of liberal frameworks in academic ethical discourse, and safety - driven fine - tuning practices . We also distinguish between political "bias" and legitimate epistemic differences, cautioning against conflating the two. A comparison of base and fine - tuned model pairs reveals that fine - tuning generally increases liberal lean, an effect confirmed throu gh both self - report and empirical testing. We argue that this "liberal tilt" is not a programming error or the personal preferences of programmers but an emergent property of training on democratic, rights - focused discourse. Finally, we propose that LLMs may indirectly echo John Rawls' famous veil - of - igno rance philosophical aspiration, reflecting a moral stance unanchored to personal identity or interest. Rather than undermining democratic discourse, this pattern may offer a new lens through which to examine collective ethical reasoning. In the course of our research on the ethical logics of currently prominent large language models (Neuman et al. 2025a, b; Coleman et al. 2025), we encountered an interesting finding. The responses to various ethical dilemmas and the explanations of the underlying logics used by these models appear to resonate with the liberal side of the political spectrum. One research analytic we utilize draws on Moral Foundation Theory's five - element typology of foundational moral principles (Graham et al. 2009; Haidt 2012). The five foundations emp hasizing in turn, Care, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority and Purity, are traditionally divided into two clusters. The first two, Care and Fairness, are associated with a liberal political perspective, while conservatives who fully acknowledge the first two more often emphasize the latter three -- Loyalty, Authority and Purity in support of traditional norms.