Japan looks to extend intellectual property protection to creative works produced by artificial intelligence, aiming to match other countries in coping with changing notions of authorship and use in the digital age. But the law covers only productions "in which thoughts or sentiments are expressed in a creative way" -- a designation that does not apply to works produced via artificial intelligence with little human input or creative intent. Legislative changes are seen as necessary to address advancements in AI. Intellectual Property Strategy Headquarters, led by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, will make recommendations as part of a broader policy plan to be released in May. A subcommittee report due out Monday will give some details on the process.

These terms of use of the Website ("Terms of Use") describe the terms on which Evalueserve UK Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England under company number 06810791, with its registered office at Lewis House, Great Chesterford Court, Great Chesterford, Essex, CB10 1PF (hereinafter referred to as "Evalueserve") offers the users/ registrants of the Website ("You" or "Your" or "Yourself" or "User") access to the Website located at www.insightbee.com Your use of the Website constitutes Your agreement to all the terms, conditions and restrictions contained in these Terms of Use. YOUR USE OF THE WEBSITE SIGNIFIES THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE TERMS OF USE AND THAT YOU AGREE TO BE LEGALLY BOUND BY THE SAME. IN ADDITION TO THESE TERMS OF USE, BY USING THE WEBSITE YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE READ, UNDERSTAND AND AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE PRIVACY POLICY OF THE WEBSITE AVAILABLE AT www.insightbee.com/privacy FURTHER, IN THE EVENT YOU PURCHASE ANY SERVICES (AS DEFINED BELOW) YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE READ, UNDERSTAND AND AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF LICENSE AVAILABLE AT www.insightbee.com/terms

You could be sent to prison and charged with a felony for shooting a drone from the sky. According to the federal law, 18 USC S 32, anyone who willfully'sets fire to, damages, destroys, or wrecks an aircraft' will be fined or imprisoned no more than 20 years or both. And the FAA says drones fall into the category of'aircraft' and threatening anyone operating a drone is also punishable with jail time. According to the federal law, 18 USC S 32, anyone who willfully'sets fire to, damages, destroys, or wrecks an aircraft' will be fined or imprisoned no more than 20 years or both. And experts say drones fall into the category of'aircraft' and threatening anyone operating a drone falls is also punishable with jail time The law says that if you attempt to shoot down a flying robot from the sky, you could face up to two decades behind bars, and/or be handed a fine up to a quarter of a million dollars.

We present a novel approach to account for preferences in a well known structured argumentation formalism, Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA). The new formalism, called ABA+, incorporates object-level preferences (over assumptions) directly into the attack relation to reverse attacks. We give several basic desirable properties of ABA+.

We investigate case-based reasoning (CBR) problems where cases are represented by abstract factors and (positive or negative) outcomes, and an outcome for a new case, represented by abstract factors, needs to be established. To this end, we employ abstract argumentation (AA) and propose a novel methodology for CBR, called AA-CBR. The argumentative formulation naturally allows to characterise the computation of an outcome as a dialogical process between a proponent and an opponent, and can also be used to extract explanations for why an outcome for a new case is (not) computed.

We provide new insights into the area of combining abstract argumentation frameworks with probabilistic reasoning. In particular, we consider the scenario when assessments on the probabilities of a subset of the arguments is given and the probabilities of the remaining arguments have to be derived, taking both the topology of the argumentation framework and principles of probabilistic reasoning into account. We generalize this scenario by also considering inconsistent assessments, i.e., assessments that contradict the topology of the argumentation framework. Building on approaches to inconsistency measurement, we present a general framework to measure the amount of conflict of these assessments and provide a method for inconsistent-tolerant reasoning.

In Supreme Court parlance and the political science literature, an ideal point positions a justice in a continuous space and can be interpreted as a quantification of the justice's policy preferences. We present an automated approach to infer such ideal points for justices of the US Supreme Court. This approach combines topic modeling over case opinions with the voting (and endorsing) behavior of justices. Furthermore, given a topic of interest, say the Fourth Amendment, the topic model can be optionally seeded with supervised information to steer the inference of ideal points. Application of this methodology over five years of cases provides interesting perspectives into the leaning of justices on crucial issues, coalitions underlying specific topics, and the role of swing justices in deciding the outcomes of cases.

In this demo we present a semantic framework for innovation and patent analytics powered by Mined Semantic Analysis (MSA). Our framework provides cognitive assistance to its users through a Web-based visual and interactive interface. First, we describe building a conceptual knowledge graph by mining user-generated encyclopedic textual corpus for semantic associations. Then, we demonstrate applying the acquired knowledge to support many cognition and knowledge based use cases for innovation analysis including technology exploration and landscaping, competitive analysis, literature and prior art search and others.

Green security — protection of forests, fish and wildlife — is a critical problem in environmental sustainability. We focus on the problem  of  optimizing the defense of forests againstillegal logging, where often we are faced with the challenge of teaming up many different groups,  from national police to forest guards to NGOs, each with differing capabilities and costs. This paper introduces a new, yet fundamental problem: SimultaneousOptimization of Resource Teams and Tactics (SORT).  SORT contrasts with most previous game-theoretic research for green security — in particular based onsecurity games — that has solely focused on optimizing patrolling tactics, without consideration of team formation or coordination.  We develop new models and scalable algorithms to apply SORT towards illegal logging in large forest areas. We evaluate our methods on a variety of synthetic examples, as well as a real-world case study using data from our on-going collaboration in Madagascar .

Strategic argumentation provides a simple model of disputation. We investigate it in the context of Dung's abstract argumentation. We show that strategic argumentation under the grounded semantics is resistant tocorruption -- specifically, collusion and espionage — in a sense similar to Bartholdi et al's notion of a voting scheme resistant to manipulation. Under the stable semantics, strategic argumentation is resistant to espionage, but its resistance to collusion varies according to the aims of the disputants. These results are extended to a variety of concrete languages for argumentation.