Artificial intelligence (AI) features are increasingly being embedded in cars and are central to the operation of self-driving cars (SDC). There is little or no effort expended towards understanding and assessing the broad legal and regulatory impact of the decisions made by AI in cars. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to determine the perceived barriers, benefits and facilitating factors of SDC in order to help us understand the suitability and limitations of existing and proposed law and regulation. (1) existing and proposed laws are largely based on claimed benefits of SDV that are still mostly speculative and untested; (2) while publicly presented as issues of assigning blame and identifying who pays where the SDC is involved in an accident, the barriers broadly intersect with almost every area of society, laws and regulations; and (3) new law and regulation are most frequently identified as the primary factor for enabling SDC. Research on assessing the impact of AI in SDC needs to be broadened beyond negligence and liability to encompass barriers, benefits and facilitating factors identified in this paper. Results of this paper are significant in that they point to the need for deeper comprehension of the broad impact of all existing law and regulations on the introduction of SDC technology, with a focus on identifying only those areas truly requiring ongoing legislative attention.

The convenient access to copious multi-faceted data has encouraged machine learning researchers to reconsider correlation-based learning and embrace the opportunity of causality-based learning, i.e., causal machine learning (causal learning). Recent years have therefore witnessed great effort in developing causal learning algorithms aiming to help AI achieve human-level intelligence. Due to the lack-of ground-truth data, one of the biggest challenges in current causal learning research is algorithm evaluations. This largely impedes the cross-pollination of AI and causal inference, and hinders the two fields to benefit from the advances of the other. To bridge from conventional causal inference (i.e., based on statistical methods) to causal learning with big data (i.e., the intersection of causal inference and machine learning), in this survey, we review commonly-used datasets, evaluation methods, and measures for causal learning using an evaluation pipeline similar to conventional machine learning. We focus on the two fundamental causal-inference tasks and causality-aware machine learning tasks. Limitations of current evaluation procedures are also discussed. We then examine popular causal inference tools/packages and conclude with primary challenges and opportunities for benchmarking causal learning algorithms in the era of big data. The survey seeks to bring to the forefront the urgency of developing publicly available benchmarks and consensus-building standards for causal learning evaluation with observational data. In doing so, we hope to broaden the discussions and facilitate collaboration to advance the innovation and application of causal learning.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents opportunities to develop tools and techniques for addressing some of the major global challenges and deliver solutions with significant social and economic impacts. The application of AI has far-reaching implications for the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in general and sustainable urban development in particular. However, existing attempts to understand and use the opportunities offered by AI for SDG 11 have been explored sparsely, and the shortage of empirical evidence about the practical application of AI remains. In this chapter, we analyze the contribution of AI to support the progress of SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). We address the knowledge gap by empirically analyzing the AI systems (N 29) from the AI SDG database and the Community Research and Development Information Service (CORDIS) database. Our analysis revealed that AI systems have indeed contributed to advancing sustainable cities in several ways (e.g., waste management, air quality monitoring, disaster response management, transportation management), but many projects are still working for citizens and not with them. This snapshot of AI's impact on SDG11 is inherently partial yet useful to advance our understanding as we move towards more mature systems and research on the impact of AI systems for the social good. Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to mitigate several issues facing cities, such as road safety, waste management, air pollution, and disaster risk reduction (Gupta et al., 2021). Examples of recent AI systems for improved well-being in cities include a tool for semi-automatic digitization of sketch maps to support the inclusion of indigenous communities through the documentation of their land rights (Degbelo et al., 2021; Chipofya et al., 2020), a system for traffic monitoring based on Wireless Signals (Gupta et al., 2018), approaches for efficient waste management (Barns, 2019), air quality modelling (Gupta et al., 2018) and urban health monitoring systems (Allam and Jones, 2020).

While Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are deriving the major innovations in nearly every field through their powerful automation, we are also witnessing the peril behind automation as a form of bias, such as automated racism, gender bias, and adversarial bias. As the societal impact of DNNs grows, finding an effective way to steer DNNs to align their behavior with the human mental model has become indispensable in realizing fair and accountable models. We propose a novel framework of Interactive Attention Alignment (IAA) that aims at realizing human-steerable Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). IAA leverages DNN model explanation method as an interactive medium that humans can use to unveil the cases of biased model attention and directly adjust the attention. In improving the DNN using human-generated adjusted attention, we introduce GRADIA, a novel computational pipeline that jointly maximizes attention quality and prediction accuracy. We evaluated IAA framework in Study 1 and GRADIA in Study 2 in a gender classification problem. Study 1 found applying IAA can significantly improve the perceived quality of model attention from human eyes. In Study 2, we found using GRADIA can (1) significantly improve the perceived quality of model attention and (2) significantly improve model performance in scenarios where the training samples are limited. We present implications for future interactive user interfaces design towards human-alignable AI.

Following on from the publication of its Feasibility Study in December 2020, the Council of Europe's Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI) and its subgroups initiated efforts to formulate and draft its Possible Elements of a Legal Framework on Artificial Intelligence, based on the Council of Europe's standards on human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. This document was ultimately adopted by the CAHAI plenary in December 2021. To support this effort, The Alan Turing Institute undertook a programme of research that explored the governance processes and practical tools needed to operationalise the integration of human right due diligence with the assurance of trustworthy AI innovation practices. The resulting framework was completed and submitted to the Council of Europe in September 2021. It presents an end-to-end approach to the assurance of AI project lifecycles that integrates context-based risk analysis and appropriate stakeholder engagement with comprehensive impact assessment, and transparent risk management, impact mitigation, and innovation assurance practices. Taken together, these interlocking processes constitute a Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law Assurance Framework (HUDERAF). The HUDERAF combines the procedural requirements for principles-based human rights due diligence with the governance mechanisms needed to set up technical and socio-technical guardrails for responsible and trustworthy AI innovation practices. Its purpose is to provide an accessible and user-friendly set of mechanisms for facilitating compliance with a binding legal framework on artificial intelligence, based on the Council of Europe's standards on human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, and to ensure that AI innovation projects are carried out with appropriate levels of public accountability, transparency, and democratic governance.

In our next Lightning Interview, we speak with Weaviate's co-creator, Bob van Luijt. In this live webinar, we will examine some naive ML workflows that don't take the development-production feedback loop into account and explore why they break down, showcase some system design principles that will help manage these feedback loops more effectively, and more. Data Governance is a critical component to ensuring a company is compliant with privacy laws and regulations alongside providing their data citizens with secure self-service access to trusted and quality data. In this webinar join us as we talk about noteworthy highlights in the AI/ML space from 2021, upcoming trends in ML/AI for 2022, and more. Hear first-hand from three Z by HP Data Science Global Ambassadors how the Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL 2) has brought productivity and efficiency to their workflows.

The "race" for dominance in AI is far from fair: Not only do a few developed economies possess certain material advantages right from the start, they also set the rules. They have an advantage in research and development, and possess a skilled workforce as well as wealth to invest in AI. We can also look at the state of inequity in AI in terms of governance: How "tech fluent" are policymakers in developing and underdeveloped countries? What barriers do they face in crafting regulations and industrial policy? Are they sufficiently represented and empowered at the international bodies that set rules and standards on AI?

A first-of-it's kind case in Los Angeles County is going to play a big role in determining culpability whenever self-driving cars get into accidents. Prosecutors have charged a driver with felony manslaughter after his Tesla crashed into a car in 2019, killing two people. The accused was in the driver's seat, but prosecutors say his Tesla … was on autopilot. A Tesla on autopilot killed two people in Gardena. Is the driver guilty of manslaughter?

What do we talk about when we talk about AI ethics? Just like AI itself, definitions for AI ethics seem to abound. A definition that seems to have garnered some consensus is that AI ethics is a system of moral principles and techniques intended to inform the development and responsible use of artificial intelligence technologies. If this definition seems ambiguous to you, you aren't alone. There is an array of issues that people tend to associate with the term "AI ethics," ranging from bias in algorithms, to the asymmetrical or unlawful use of AI, environmental impact of AI technology and national and international policies around it.

This could counteract the lack of alternative funding for smaller resource-constrained research labs, which can't compete with larger tech giants like Google that "have disproportionate control over the direction of AI research." Refocus on common-sense understanding in AI, so comprehension takes a priority over prediction. This could help combat social problems, such as algorithmic discrimination and deep learning adversarial attacks, as well as result in more "technically robust systems." Empower marginalized researchers, so more value is given to the ways AI influences society and people who are disempowered. A lack of diversity in the field, for example, leads to biased algorithms, which has been highlighted by researchers such as former Google expert Timnit Gebru.