An estimated hundreds of thousands of rape kits sit untested in police departments nationwide, according to the Joyful Heart Foundation, a group that helps sexual assault victims. A Denver cardiologist has been charged with drugging and sexually assaulting a string of women he met on the dating apps Hinge and Tinder, court papers allege. Stephen Matthews, 35, was first arrested March 22 based on one victim's disturbing accusations. Widespread reports of the allegations prompted nine other women to come forward, officials said. On Monday, Matthews was arrested on the new charges outside the Denver District Courthouse after making an appearance on the initial case.

Evidence retrieval is a core part of automatic fact-checking. Prior work makes simplifying assumptions in retrieval that depart from real-world use cases: either no access to evidence, access to evidence curated by a human fact-checker, or access to evidence available long after the claim has been made. In this work, we present the first fully automated pipeline to check real-world claims by retrieving raw evidence from the web. We restrict our retriever to only search documents available prior to the claim's making, modeling the realistic scenario where an emerging claim needs to be checked. Our pipeline includes five components: claim decomposition, raw document retrieval, fine-grained evidence retrieval, claim-focused summarization, and veracity judgment. We conduct experiments on complex political claims in the ClaimDecomp dataset and show that the aggregated evidence produced by our pipeline improves veracity judgments. Human evaluation finds the evidence summary produced by our system is reliable (it does not hallucinate information) and relevant to answering key questions about a claim, suggesting that it can assist fact-checkers even when it cannot surface a complete evidence set.

A basic task for most Legal Artificial Intelligence (Legal AI) applications is Named Entity Recognition (NER). However, texts produced in the context of legal practice make references to entities that are not trivially recognized by the currently available NERs. There is a lack of categorization of legislation, jurisprudence, evidence, penalties, the roles of people in a legal process (judge, lawyer, victim, defendant, witness), types of locations (crime location, defendant's address), etc. In this sense, there is still a need for a robust golden collection, annotated with fine-grained entities of the legal domain, and which covers various documents of a legal process, such as petitions, inquiries, complaints, decisions and sentences. In this article, we describe the development of the Golden Collection of the Brazilian Judiciary (CDJUR-BR) contemplating a set of fine-grained named entities that have been annotated by experts in legal documents. The creation of CDJUR-BR followed its own methodology that aimed to attribute a character of comprehensiveness and robustness. Together with the CDJUR-BR repository we provided a NER based on the BERT model and trained with the CDJUR-BR, whose results indicated the prevalence of the CDJUR-BR.

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a significant advancement in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), enabling collaborative model training across distributed devices while maintaining data privacy. As the importance of FL increases, addressing trustworthiness issues in its various aspects becomes crucial. In this survey, we provide an extensive overview of the current state of Trustworthy FL, exploring existing solutions and well-defined pillars relevant to Trustworthy . Despite the growth in literature on trustworthy centralized Machine Learning (ML)/Deep Learning (DL), further efforts are necessary to identify trustworthiness pillars and evaluation metrics specific to FL models, as well as to develop solutions for computing trustworthiness levels. We propose a taxonomy that encompasses three main pillars: Interpretability, Fairness, and Security & Privacy. Each pillar represents a dimension of trust, further broken down into different notions. Our survey covers trustworthiness challenges at every level in FL settings. We present a comprehensive architecture of Trustworthy FL, addressing the fundamental principles underlying the concept, and offer an in-depth analysis of trust assessment mechanisms. In conclusion, we identify key research challenges related to every aspect of Trustworthy FL and suggest future research directions. This comprehensive survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on the development and implementation of Trustworthy FL systems, contributing to a more secure and reliable AI landscape.

The complexity and increasingly tight coupling of supply chains poses a major logistical challenge for leading companies. Another challenge is that leading companies -- under pressure from consumers, a critical public and legislative measures such as supply chain laws -- have to take more responsibility than before for their suppliers' labour standards. In this paper, we discuss a new approach that leading companies are using to try to address these challenges: algorithmic prediction of business risks, but also environmental and social risks. We describe the technical and cultural conditions for algorithmic prediction and explain how -- from the perspective of leading companies -- it helps to address both challenges. We then develop scenarios on how and with what kind of social consequences algorithmic prediction can be used by leading companies. From the scenarios, we derive policy options for different stakeholder groups to help develop algorithmic prediction towards improving labour standards and worker voice. -- Die Komplexit\"at und zunehmend enge Kopplung vieler Lieferketten stellt eine gro{\ss}e logistische Herausforderung f\"ur Leitunternehmen dar. Eine weitere Herausforderung besteht darin, dass Leitunternehmen -- gedr\"angt durch Konsument:innen, eine kritische \"Offentlichkeit und gesetzgeberische Ma{\ss}nahmen wie die Lieferkettengesetze -- st\"arker als bisher Verantwortung f\"ur Arbeitsstandards in ihren Zulieferbetrieben \"ubernehmen m\"ussen. In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir einen neuen Ansatz, mit dem Leitunternehmen versuchen, diese Herausforderungen zu bearbeiten: die algorithmische Vorhersage von betriebswirtschaftlichen, aber auch \"okologischen und sozialen Risiken. Wir beschreiben die technischen und kulturellen Bedingungen f\"ur algorithmische Vorhersage und erkl\"aren, wie diese -- aus Perspektive von Leitunternehmen -- bei der Bearbeitung beider Herausforderungen hilft. Anschlie{\ss}end entwickeln wir Szenarien, wie und mit welchen sozialen Konsequenzen algorithmische Vorhersage durch Leitunternehmen eingesetzt werden kann. Aus den Szenarien leiten wir Handlungsoptionen f\"ur verschiedene Stakeholder-Gruppen ab, die dabei helfen sollen, algorithmische Vorhersage im Sinne einer Verbesserung von Arbeitsstandards und Workers' Voice weiterzuentwickeln.

Users' physical safety is an increasing concern as the market for intelligent systems continues to grow, where unconstrained systems may recommend users dangerous actions that can lead to serious injury. Covertly unsafe text is an area of particular interest, as such text may arise from everyday scenarios and are challenging to detect as harmful. We propose FARM, a novel framework leveraging external knowledge for trustworthy rationale generation in the context of safety. In particular, FARM foveates on missing knowledge to qualify the information required to reason in specific scenarios and retrieves this information with attribution to trustworthy sources. This knowledge is used to both classify the safety of the original text and generate human-interpretable rationales, shedding light on the risk of systems to specific user groups and helping both stakeholders manage the risks of their systems and policymakers to provide concrete safeguards for consumer safety. Our experiments show that FARM obtains state-of-the-art results on the SafeText dataset, showing absolute improvement in safety classification accuracy by 5.9%.

While the increased use of AI in the manufacturing sector has been widely noted, there is little understanding on the risks that it may raise in a manufacturing organisation. Although various high level frameworks and definitions have been proposed to consolidate potential risks, practitioners struggle with understanding and implementing them. This lack of understanding exposes manufacturing to a multitude of risks, including the organisation, its workers, as well as suppliers and clients. In this paper, we explore and interpret the applicability of responsible, ethical, and trustworthy AI within the context of manufacturing. We then use a broadened adaptation of a machine learning lifecycle to discuss, through the use of illustrative examples, how each step may result in a given AI trustworthiness concern. We additionally propose a number of research questions to the manufacturing research community, in order to help guide future research so that the economic and societal benefits envisaged by AI in manufacturing are delivered safely and responsibly.

Sensing technologies deployed in the workplace can unobtrusively collect detailed data about individual activities and group interactions that are otherwise difficult to capture. A hopeful application of these technologies is that they can help businesses and workers optimize productivity and wellbeing. However, given the workplace's inherent and structural power dynamics, the prevalent approach of accepting tacit compliance to monitor work activities rather than seeking workers' meaningful consent raises privacy and ethical concerns. This paper unpacks the challenges workers face when consenting to workplace wellbeing technologies. Using a hypothetical case to prompt reflection among six multi-stakeholder focus groups involving 15 participants, we explored participants' expectations and capacity to consent to these technologies. We sketched possible interventions that could better support meaningful consent to workplace wellbeing technologies by drawing on critical computing and feminist scholarship -- which reframes consent from a purely individual choice to a structural condition experienced at the individual level that needs to be freely given, reversible, informed, enthusiastic, and specific (FRIES). The focus groups revealed how workers are vulnerable to "meaningless" consent -- as they may be subject to power dynamics that minimize their ability to withhold consent and may thus experience an erosion of autonomy, also undermining the value of data gathered in the name of "wellbeing." To meaningfully consent, participants wanted changes to the technology and to the policies and practices surrounding the technology. Our mapping of what prevents workers from meaningfully consenting to workplace wellbeing technologies (challenges) and what they require to do so (interventions) illustrates how the lack of meaningful consent is a structural problem requiring socio-technical solutions.

Machine learning (ML) systems have achieved remarkable performance across a wide area of applications. However, they frequently exhibit unfair behaviors in sensitive application domains, raising severe fairness concerns. To evaluate and test fairness, engineers often generate individual discriminatory instances to expose unfair behaviors before model deployment. However, existing baselines ignore the naturalness of generation and produce instances that deviate from the real data distribution, which may fail to reveal the actual model fairness since these unnatural discriminatory instances are unlikely to appear in practice. To address the problem, this paper proposes a framework named Latent Imitator (LIMI) to generate more natural individual discriminatory instances with the help of a generative adversarial network (GAN), where we imitate the decision boundary of the target model in the semantic latent space of GAN and further samples latent instances on it. Specifically, we first derive a surrogate linear boundary to coarsely approximate the decision boundary of the target model, which reflects the nature of the original data distribution. Subsequently, to obtain more natural instances, we manipulate random latent vectors to the surrogate boundary with a one-step movement, and further conduct vector calculation to probe two potential discriminatory candidates that may be more closely located in the real decision boundary. Extensive experiments on various datasets demonstrate that our LIMI outperforms other baselines largely in effectiveness ($\times$9.42 instances), efficiency ($\times$8.71 speeds), and naturalness (+19.65%) on average. In addition, we empirically demonstrate that retraining on test samples generated by our approach can lead to improvements in both individual fairness (45.67% on $IF_r$ and 32.81% on $IF_o$) and group fairness (9.86% on $SPD$ and 28.38% on $AOD$}).

Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer says Congress "must move quickly" to regulate artificial intelligence and has convened a bipartisan group of senators to work on legislation. Schumer says the group met on Wednesday and that his staff has already met with close to 100 CEOs, scientists and academics who deal with the technology. "We can't move so fast that we do flawed legislation, but there's no time for waste or delay or sitting back," Schumer said in opening remarks on the Senate floor Thursday.