To use, or not to use, Bard? That is the Shakespearean question an Associated Press reporter sought to answer while testing out Google's artificially intelligent chatbot. The recently rolled-out bot dubbed Bard is the internet search giant's answer to the ChatGPT tool that Microsoft has been melding into its Bing search engine and other software. During several hours of interaction, the AP learned Bard is quite forthcoming about its unreliability and other shortcomings, including its potential for mischief in next year's U.S. presidential election. Even as it occasionally warned of the problems it could unleash, Bard repeatedly emphasized its belief that it will blossom into a force for good.

March 29 (Reuters) - Elon Musk and a group of artificial intelligence experts and industry executives are calling for a six-month pause in developing systems more powerful than OpenAI's newly launched GPT-4, in an open letter citing potential risks to society. Earlier this month, Microsoft-backed OpenAI unveiled the fourth iteration of its GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) AI program, which has wowed users by engaging them in human-like conversation, composing songs and summarising lengthy documents. "Powerful AI systems should be developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable," said the letter issued by the Future of Life Institute. The non-profit is primarily funded by the Musk Foundation, as well as London-based group Founders Pledge, and Silicon Valley Community Foundation, according to the European Union's transparency register. "AI stresses me out," Musk said earlier this month.

Bayesian Optimization (BO) (Shahriari et al., 2015) is a popular sample-efficient optimization technique to solve problems where the objective is expensive. It has been successfully applied in diverse areas (Greenhill et al., 2020) including material discovery (Li et al., 2017), alloy design (Barnett et al., 2020) and molecular design (Gómez-Bombarelli et al., 2018). However, standard BO typically operates tabula rasa, building its model of the objective from minimal priors that do not include domain-specific information. While there has been some progress made incorporating domain-specific knowledge to accelerate BO (Li et al., 2018; Hvarfner et al., 2022) or transfer learning from previous experiments (Shilton et al., 2017), it remains the case that there is a significant corpus of knowledge and expertise that could potentially accelerate BO even further but which remain largely untapped due to the inherent complexities involved in knowledge extraction and exploitation. In particular, this often arises from the fact that experts tend to organize their knowledge in complex schema containing concepts, attributes and relationships (Rousseau, 2001), making the elicitation of relevant expert knowledge, both quantitative and qualitative, a difficult task.

Linear transformation of the inputs alters the training performance of feed-forward networks that are otherwise equivalent. However, most linear transforms are viewed as a pre-processing operation separate from the actual training. Starting from equivalent networks, it is shown that pre-processing inputs using linear transformation are equivalent to multiplying the negative gradient matrix with an autocorrelation matrix per training iteration. Second order method is proposed to find the autocorrelation matrix that maximizes learning in a given iteration. When the autocorrelation matrix is diagonal, the method optimizes input gains. This optimal input gain (OIG) approach is used to improve two first-order two-stage training algorithms, namely back-propagation (BP) and hidden weight optimization (HWO), which alternately update the input weights and solve linear equations for output weights. Results show that the proposed OIG approach greatly enhances the performance of the first-order algorithms, often allowing them to rival the popular Levenberg-Marquardt approach with far less computation. It is shown that HWO is equivalent to BP with Whitening transformation applied to the inputs. HWO effectively combines Whitening transformation with learning. Thus, OIG improved HWO could be a significant building block to more complex deep learning architectures.

We investigate whether large language models can perform the creative hypothesis generation that human researchers regularly do. While the error rate is high, generative AI seems to be able to effectively structure vast amounts of scientific knowledge and provide interesting and testable hypotheses. The future scientific enterprise may include synergistic efforts with a swarm of "hypothesis machines", challenged by automated experimentation and adversarial peer reviews. In a university or research institute, a significant portion of fresh ideas arises out of discussions.

An increasing number of monitoring systems have been developed in smart cities to ensure that the real-time operations of a city satisfy safety and performance requirements. However, many existing city requirements are written in English with missing, inaccurate, or ambiguous information. There is a high demand for assisting city policymakers in converting human-specified requirements to machine-understandable formal specifications for monitoring systems. To tackle this limitation, we build CitySpec, the first intelligent assistant system for requirement specification in smart cities. To create CitySpec, we first collect over 1,500 real-world city requirements across different domains (e.g., transportation and energy) from over 100 cities and extract city-specific knowledge to generate a dataset of city vocabulary with 3,061 words. We also build a translation model and enhance it through requirement synthesis and develop a novel online learning framework with shielded validation. The evaluation results on real-world city requirements show that CitySpec increases the sentence-level accuracy of requirement specification from 59.02% to 86.64%, and has strong adaptability to a new city and a new domain (e.g., the F1 score for requirements in Seattle increases from 77.6% to 93.75% with online learning). After the enhancement from the shield function, CitySpec is now immune to most known textual adversarial inputs (e.g., the attack success rate of DeepWordBug after the shield function is reduced to 0% from 82.73%). We test the CitySpec with 18 participants from different domains. CitySpec shows its strong usability and adaptability to different domains, and also its robustness to malicious inputs.

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multi-center study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and postprocessing (66%). The "typical" lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

Ideally, dialogue systems should generate responses that are faithful to the knowledge contained in relevant documents. However, many models generate hallucinated responses instead that contradict it or contain unverifiable information. To mitigate such undesirable behaviour, it has been proposed to fine-tune a `negative expert' on negative examples and subtract its parameters from those of a pre-trained model. However, intuitively, this does not take into account that some parameters are more responsible than others in causing hallucinations. Thus, we propose to weigh their individual importance via (an approximation of) the Fisher Information matrix, which measures the uncertainty of their estimate. We call this method Elastic Weight Removal (EWR). We evaluate our method -- using different variants of Flan-T5 as a backbone language model -- on multiple datasets for information-seeking dialogue generation and compare our method with state-of-the-art techniques for faithfulness, such as CTRL, Quark, DExperts, and Noisy Channel reranking. Extensive automatic and human evaluation shows that EWR systematically increases faithfulness at minor costs in terms of other metrics. However, we notice that only discouraging hallucinations may increase extractiveness, i.e. shallow copy-pasting of document spans, which can be undesirable. Hence, as a second main contribution, we show that our method can be extended to simultaneously discourage hallucinations and extractive responses. We publicly release the code for reproducing EWR and all baselines.

The current state of the art systems in Artificial Intelligence (AI) enabled intrusion detection use a variety of black box methods. These black box methods are generally trained using Error Based Learning (EBL) techniques with a focus on creating accurate models. These models have high performative costs and are not easily explainable. A white box Competitive Learning (CL) based eXplainable Intrusion Detection System (X-IDS) offers a potential solution to these problem. CL models utilize an entirely different learning paradigm than EBL approaches. This different learning process makes the CL family of algorithms innately explainable and less resource intensive. In this paper, we create an X-IDS architecture that is based on DARPA's recommendation for explainable systems. In our architecture we leverage CL algorithms like, Self Organizing Maps (SOM), Growing Self Organizing Maps (GSOM), and Growing Hierarchical Self Organizing Map (GHSOM). The resulting models can be data-mined to create statistical and visual explanations. Our architecture is tested using NSL-KDD and CIC-IDS-2017 benchmark datasets, and produces accuracies that are 1% - 3% less than EBL models. However, CL models are much more explainable than EBL models. Additionally, we use a pruning process that is able to significantly reduce the size of these CL based models. By pruning our models, we are able to increase prediction speeds. Lastly, we analyze the statistical and visual explanations generated by our architecture, and we give a strategy that users could use to help navigate the set of explanations. These explanations will help users build trust with an Intrusion Detection System (IDS), and allow users to discover ways to increase the IDS's potency.

We investigate the nonlinear regression problem under L2 loss (square loss) functions. Traditional nonlinear regression models often result in non-convex optimization problems with respect to the parameter set. We show that a convex nonlinear regression model exists for the traditional least squares problem, which can be a promising towards designing more complex systems with easier to train models.