Socio-linguistic indicators of text, such as emotion or sentiment, are often extracted using neural networks in order to better understand features of social media. One indicator that is often overlooked, however, is the presence of hazards within text. Recent psychological research suggests that statements about hazards are more believable than statements about benefits (a property known as negatively biased credulity), and that political liberals and conservatives differ in how often they share hazards. Here, we develop a new model to detect information concerning hazards, trained on a new collection of annotated X posts, as well as urban legends annotated in previous work. We show that not only does this model perform well (outperforming, e.g., zero-shot human annotator proxies, such as GPT-4) but that the hazard information it extracts is not strongly correlated with other indicators, namely moral outrage, sentiment, emotions, and threat words. (That said, consonant with expectations, hazard information does correlate positively with such emotions as fear, and negatively with emotions like joy.) We then apply this model to three datasets: X posts about COVID-19, X posts about the 2023 Hamas-Israel war, and a new expanded collection of urban legends. From these data, we uncover words associated with hazards unique to each dataset as well as differences in this language between groups of users, such as conservatives and liberals, which informs what these groups perceive as hazards. We further show that information about hazards peaks in frequency after major hazard events, and therefore acts as an automated indicator of such events. Finally, we find that information about hazards is especially prevalent in urban legends, which is consistent with previous work that finds that reports of hazards are more likely to be both believed and transmitted.

The Palestinian Hamas group has expressed support for Iran after it launched hundreds of missiles and drones at Israel in retaliation for a deadly assault on its consulate in the Syrian capital, Damascus. In a statement on Saturday, Hamas, which governs the Palestinian enclave of Gaza, said it affirmed "the natural right" of countries and peoples in the Middle East to defend themselves "in the face of Zionist aggressions". "The military operation carried out by Iran against the Zionist entity is a natural right and a due response to the crime of targeting the consulate in Damascus," it said. The Iranian salvo, fired late on Saturday night, consisted of more than 300 cruise missiles, ballistic missiles and drones, according to the Israeli military. Some 99 percent of the projectiles were intercepted, an Israeli spokesman said, with help from France, the United Kingdom and the United States.

The Israeli military's bombing campaign in Gaza used a previously undisclosed AI-powered database that at one stage identified 37,000 potential targets based on their apparent links to Hamas, according to intelligence sources involved in the war. In addition to talking about their use of the AI system, called Lavender, the intelligence sources claim that Israeli military officials permitted large numbers of Palestinian civilians to be killed, particularly during the early weeks and months of the conflict. Their unusually candid testimony provides a rare glimpse into the first-hand experiences of Israeli intelligence officials who have been using machine-learning systems to help identify targets during the six-month war. Israel's use of powerful AI systems in its war on Hamas has entered uncharted territory for advanced warfare, raising a host of legal and moral questions, and transforming the relationship between military personnel and machines. "This is unparalleled, in my memory," said one intelligence officer who used Lavender, adding that they had more faith in a "statistical mechanism" than a grieving soldier.

An Israeli drone strike has killed a member of Hamas and one other person in southwestern Lebanon near a refugee camp housing displaced Palestinians. It comes amid increased cross-border attacks between Israel and Lebanon.

Radio host Tommy Sotomayor reacts to artificial intelligence images rewriting history, on'Jesse Watters Primetime.' Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., slammed Google's AI chatbot Gemini as "preposterously woke" on Friday for its refusal to produce any images of White people. The company paused the chatbot's image generation on Thursday after social media users pointed out that the system was creating inaccurate historical images that sometimes replaced White people, like the Founding Fathers, with images of Black, Native American and Asian people. "Google deserves condemnation for creating a racist, preposterously woke, Hamas-sympathizing AI system," Cotton said in a statement on X, formerly Twitter. "Republican lawmakers will remember this the next time Google comes asking for antitrust help."

Four months into the war between Israel and Hamas, the combatants, their allies, and their neighbors are closer than ever to reaching a cease-fire or even a settlement of their disputes--and are also equally close to seeing it spin out of control into a widening regional conflict. They are tracing this thin line between negotiated peace and escalating mayhem along every front of the Middle East's hot spots, which are intensifying, enlarging, and mingling with one another--a fact that makes it harder but also potentially more manageable to douse the flames. On Friday, U.S. combat planes fired 125 precision-guided missiles and drones at 85 targets into seven facilities--command-control and intelligence centers, supply lines and storage sites for rockets, missiles, and drones, as well as other military targets--all run by Iranian-backed militias in Iraq and Syria. The attack was in retaliation to a Jan. 28 drone strike launched by one of those militias in Iraq that killed three U.S. soldiers at a base in northeastern Jordan, near the Iraqi and Syrian borders. Militias had fired 165 drones or missiles at U.S. forces in the region since Hamas' Oct. 7 attack, but this was the first strike that killed Americans.

Hulu ran an anti-Hamas ad that appears to be made using artificial intelligence to show an idealized version of Gaza--claiming this paradise destination could exist if not for Hamas. The 30-second spot, opening like a tourism ad, shows palm trees and coastlines. There are five-star hotels and children playing. People dance, eat, and laugh, while a voiceover encourages visitors to "experience a culture rich in tradition." But it suddenly shifts, turning the face of a smiling man into a grimacing one.

A UK vessel shot down a Houthi drone in the Red Sea, the United Kingdom's Ministry of Defence has said, as tensions in the Middle East soar amid the ongoing war in Gaza. "Yesterday HMS Diamond successfully repelled a drone attack from the Iranian-backed Houthis in the Red Sea," read a statement from the ministry published on Sunday on X. "Diamond destroyed a drone targeting her, with no injuries or damage sustained to Diamond or her crew," it added. There was no immediate comment from the Houthis. The Yemen-based group previously pledged to target Israel-linked vessels in the region as part of an effort to pressure the country's government to end its bombardment of Gaza and allow more humanitarian aid supplies into the coastal Palestinian enclave. Gaza has been under heavy bombardment by Israeli forces since October 7, when Hamas fighters stormed communities in southern Israel, killing at least 1,139 people and taking about 240 others captive, according to Israeli officials.

Just 24 hours before he took to the podium on Wednesday, Hassan Nasrallah, the head of Lebanon's powerful armed group Hezbollah, was preparing to deliver a speech commemorating another of Israel's former arch foes, Qassem Soleimani, the Iranian commander killed in a U.S. drone strike four years ago to the day. But in the wake of the suspected Israeli assassination on Tuesday of Saleh al-Arouri, a top Hamas leader killed in the heart of Hezbollah's stronghold in southern Beirut, Mr. Nasrallah revised his comments to commemorate not just one of his closest allies, but two. In a highly anticipated speech on Wednesday that gained new significance in the wake of Mr. al-Arouri's assassination, Hezbollah's leader denounced the attack in Lebanon's capital as a "dangerous" milestone, pledging revenge for the killing and threatening to meet any wider Israeli conflict with unrestrained warfare. "If the enemy considers waging a war against Lebanon, our battle will be without boundaries or rules," Mr. Nasrallah said. "We are not afraid of war. Those who think of going to war with us will regret it. War with us will come at a very, very, very high cost."

Other significant Hamas officials died in Tuesday's drone strike that killed senior leader Saleh al-Arouri, harming the armed group's military capabilities in Lebanon during Israel's war on Gaza. According to Lebanese state media, the strike on a Hamas office in the Hezbollah stronghold of Dahiyeb, a southern suburb of Beirut, killed seven people. Hamas described the killing of al-Arouri on its official TV channel as "a "cowardly assassination" by Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's adviser Mark Regev told the United States-based TV news channel MSNBC that Israel had not taken responsibility for the attack and added: "Whoever did it, it must be clear that this was not an attack on the Lebanese state." Al-Arouri, 57, was the deputy chief of the Hamas political bureau.