The development of Crud-Induced Power Shift (CIPS) is an operational challenge in Pressurized Water Reactors that is due to the development of crud on the fuel rod cladding. The available predictive tools developed previously, usually based on fundamental physics, are computationally expensive and have shown differing degrees of accuracy. This work proposes a completely top-down approach to predict CIPS instances on an assembly level with reactor-specific calibration built-in. Built using artificial neural networks, this work uses a three-dimensional convolutional approach to leverage the image-like layout of the input data. As a classifier, the convolutional neural network model predicts whether a given assembly will experience CIPS as well as the time of occurrence during a given cycle. This surrogate model is both trained and tested using a combination of calculated core model parameters and measured plant data from Unit 1 of the Catawba Nuclear Station. After the evaluation of its performance using various metrics, Monte Carlo dropout is employed for extensive uncertainty quantification of the model predictions. The results indicate that this methodology could be a viable approach in predicting CIPS with an assembly-level resolution across both clean and afflicted cycles, while using limited computational resources.

International Research Center for Neurointelligence, University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan (Dated: July 16, 2024) Chaotic dynamics are ubiquitous in nature and useful in engineering, but their geometric design can be challenging. Here, we propose a method using reservoir computing to generate chaos with a desired shape by providing a periodic orbit as a template, called a skeleton. We exploit a bifurcation of the reservoir to intentionally induce unsuccessful training of the skeleton, revealing inherent chaos. The emergence of this untrained attractor, resulting from the interaction between the skeleton and the reservoir's intrinsic dynamics, offers a novel semi-supervised framework for designing chaos. Chaotic dynamics are prevalent in nature, including biological neural systems [1-3], and are applied in engineering, such as for random number generation [4, 5], communication systems [6, 7], optimization [8, 9], deep learning [10, 11], and robot control [12-14]. A notable challenge is designing the geometric shapes of chaotic attractors, for which no practical methods have been proposed so far, to the best of our knowledge.

A surrogate model approximates the outputs of a solver of Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) with a low computational cost. In this article, we propose a method to build learning-based surrogates in the context of parameterized PDEs, which are PDEs that depend on a set of parameters but are also temporal and spatial processes. Our contribution is a method hybridizing the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and several Support Vector Regression machines. This method is conceived to work in real-time, thus aimed for being used in the context of digital twins, where a user can perform an interactive analysis of results based on the proposed surrogate. We present promising results on two use cases concerning electrical machines. These use cases are not toy examples but are produced an industrial computational code, they use meshes representing non-trivial geometries and contain non-linearities.

Despite significant advancements, there is a limited understanding of how large language models (LLMs) utilize knowledge for reasoning. To address this, we propose a method that deconstructs complex real-world questions into a graph, representing each question as a node with parent nodes of background knowledge needed to solve the question. We develop the DepthQA dataset, deconstructing questions into three depths: (i) recalling conceptual knowledge, (ii) applying procedural knowledge, and (iii) analyzing strategic knowledge. Based on a hierarchical graph, we quantify forward discrepancy, discrepancies in LLMs' performance on simpler sub-problems versus complex questions. We also measure backward discrepancy, where LLMs answer complex questions but struggle with simpler ones. Our analysis shows that smaller models have more discrepancies than larger models. Additionally, guiding models from simpler to complex questions through multi-turn interactions improves performance across model sizes, highlighting the importance of structured intermediate steps in knowledge reasoning. This work enhances our understanding of LLM reasoning and suggests ways to improve their problem-solving abilities.

Existing metrics for evaluating the factuality of long-form text, such as FACTSCORE (Min et al., 2023) and SAFE (Wei et al., 2024), decompose an input text into "atomic claims" and verify each against a knowledge base like Wikipedia. These metrics are not suitable for most generation tasks because they assume that every claim is verifiable (i.e., can plausibly be proven true or false). We address this issue with VERISCORE, a metric for diverse long-form generation tasks that contain both verifiable and unverifiable content. VERISCORE can be effectively implemented with either closed or fine-tuned open-weight language models, and human evaluation confirms that VERISCORE's extracted claims are more sensible than those from competing methods across eight different long-form tasks. We use VERISCORE to evaluate generations from 16 different models across multiple long-form tasks and find that while GPT-4o is the best-performing model overall, open-weight models such as Mixtral-8x22 are closing the gap. We show that an LM's VERISCORE on one task (e.g., biography generation) does not necessarily correlate to its VERISCORE on a different task (e.g., long-form QA), highlighting the need for expanding factuality evaluation across tasks with varying fact density.

Abstract--Extreme data rate scientific experiments create massive amounts of data that require efficient ML edge processing. This leads to unique validation challenges for VLSI implementations of ML algorithms: enabling bit-accurate functional simulations for performance validation in experimental software frameworks, verifying those ML models are robust under extreme quantization and pruning, and enabling ultra-fine-grained model inspection for efficient fault tolerance. We discuss approaches to developing and validating reliable algorithms at the scientific edge under such strict latency, resource, power, and area requirements in extreme experimental environments. We study metrics for developing robust algorithms, present preliminary results and mitigation strategies, and conclude with an outlook of these and future directions of research towards the longer-term goal of developing autonomous scientific experimentation methods for accelerated scientific discovery. Ground-breaking science requires instruments that push sensing technology with increasing spatial and temporal resolution to explore nature at unprecedented scales and in extreme environments.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational measurement has revolutionized assessment methods, enabling automated scoring, rapid content analysis, and personalized feedback through machine learning and natural language processing. These advancements provide timely, consistent feedback and valuable insights into student performance, thereby enhancing the assessment experience. However, the deployment of AI in education also raises significant ethical concerns regarding validity, reliability, transparency, fairness, and equity. Issues such as algorithmic bias and the opacity of AI decision-making processes pose risks of perpetuating inequalities and affecting assessment outcomes. Responding to these concerns, various stakeholders, including educators, policymakers, and organizations, have developed guidelines to ensure ethical AI use in education. The National Council of Measurement in Education's Special Interest Group on AI in Measurement and Education (AIME) also focuses on establishing ethical standards and advancing research in this area. In this paper, a diverse group of AIME members examines the ethical implications of AI-powered tools in educational measurement, explores significant challenges such as automation bias and environmental impact, and proposes solutions to ensure AI's responsible and effective use in education.

In recent decades, the causes and consequences of climate change have accelerated, affecting our planet on an unprecedented scale. This change is closely tied to the ways in which humans alter their surroundings. As our actions continue to impact natural areas, using satellite images to observe and measure these effects has become crucial for understanding and combating climate change. Aiming to map land naturalness on the continuum of modern human pressure, we have developed a multi-modal supervised deep learning framework that addresses the unique challenges of satellite data and the task at hand. We incorporate contextual and geographical priors, represented by corresponding coordinate information and broader contextual information, including and surrounding the immediate patch to be predicted. Our framework improves the model's predictive performance in mapping land naturalness from Sentinel-2 data, a type of multi-spectral optical satellite imagery. Recognizing that our protective measures are only as effective as our understanding of the ecosystem, quantifying naturalness serves as a crucial step toward enhancing our environmental stewardship.

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer a promising pathway to implement deep neural networks (DNNs) in a more energy-efficient manner since their neurons are sparsely activated and inferences are event-driven. However, there have been very few works that have demonstrated the efficacy of SNNs in language tasks partially because it is non-trivial to represent words in the forms of spikes and to deal with variable-length texts by SNNs. This work presents a "conversion + fine-tuning" two-step method for training SNNs for text classification and proposes a simple but effective way to encode pre-trained word embeddings as spike trains. We show empirically that after fine-tuning with surrogate gradients, the converted SNNs achieve comparable results to their DNN counterparts with much less energy consumption across multiple datasets for both English and Chinese. We also show that such SNNs are more robust to adversarial attacks than DNNs. Inspired by the biological neuro-synaptic framework, modern deep neural networks are successfully used in various applications (Krizhevsky et al., 2012; Graves & Jaitly, 2014; Mikolov et al., 2013b). However, the amount of computational power and energy required to run state-of-the-art deep neural models is considerable and continues to increase in the past decade. For example, a neural language model of GPT-3 (Brown et al., 2020) consumes roughly 190, 000 kWh to train (Dhar, 2020; Anthony et al., 2020), while the human brain performs perception, recognition, reasoning, control, and movement simultaneously with a power budget of just 20 W (Cox & Dean, 2014). Like biological neurons, spiking neural networks (SNNs) use discrete spikes to compute and transmit information, which are more biologically plausible and also energy-efficient than deep learning models. Spike-based computing fuelled with neuromorphic hardware provides a promising way to realize artificial intelligence while greatly reducing energy consumption. Although many studies have shown that SNNs can produce competitive results in vision (mostly classification) tasks (Cao et al., 2015; Diehl et al., 2015; Rueckauer et al., 2017; Shrestha & Orchard, 2018; Sengupta et al., 2019), there are very few works that have demonstrated their effectiveness in natural language processing (NLP) tasks (Diehl et al., 2016; Rao et al., 2022).

Neural network emulators have become an invaluable tool for a wide variety of climate and weather prediction tasks. While showing incredibly promising results, these networks do not have an inherent ability to produce equitable predictions. That is, they are not guaranteed to provide a uniform quality of prediction along any particular class or group of people. This potential for inequitable predictions motivates the need for explicit representations of fairness in these neural networks. To that end, we draw on methods for enforcing analytical physical constraints in neural networks to bias networks towards more equitable predictions. We demonstrate the promise of this methodology using the task of climate model emulation. Specifically, we propose a custom loss function which punishes emulators with unequal quality of predictions across any prespecified regions or category, here defined using human development index (HDI). This loss function weighs a standard loss metric such as mean squared error against another metric which captures inequity along the equity category (HDI), allowing us to adjust the priority of each term before training. Importantly, the loss function does not specify a particular definition of equity to bias the neural network towards, opening the door for custom fairness metrics. Our results show that neural climate emulators trained with our loss function provide more equitable predictions and that the equity metric improves with greater weighting in the loss function. We empirically demonstrate that while there is a tradeoff between accuracy and equity when prioritizing the latter during training, an appropriate selection of the equity priority hyperparameter can minimize loss of performance.