Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Genre






Label consistency in overfitted generalized k-means

Neural Information Processing Systems

We provide theoretical guarantees for label consistency in generalized k-means problems, with an emphasis on the overfitted case where the number of clusters used by the algorithm is more than the ground truth. We provide conditions under which the estimated labels are close to a refinement of the true cluster labels. We consider both exact and approximate recovery of the labels. Our results hold for any constant-factor approximation to the k-means problem. The results are also model-free and only based on bounds on the maximum or average distance of the data points to the true cluster centers. These centers themselves are loosely defined and can be taken to be any set of points for which the aforementioned distances can be controlled. We show the usefulness of the results with applications to some manifold clustering problems.


Covariance-Aware Private Mean Estimation Without Private Covariance Estimation

Neural Information Processing Systems

Informally, given n& d/ฮฑ2 samples from such a distribution with mean ยตand covariance ฮฃ, our estimators output ยตsuch that k ยต ยตkฮฃ ฮฑ, where k kฮฃ is the Mahalanobis distance. All previous estimators with the same guarantee either require strong a priori bounds on the covariance matrix or require โ„ฆ(d3/2) samples. Each of our estimators is based on a simple, general approach to designing differentially private mechanisms, but with novel technical steps to make the estimator private and sample-efficient. Our first estimator samples a point with approximately maximum Tukey depth using the exponential mechanism, but restricted to the set of points of large Tukey depth. Proving that this mechanism is private requires a novel analysis. Our second estimator perturbs the empirical mean of the data set with noise calibrated to the empirical covariance, without releasing the covariance itself. Its sample complexity guarantees hold more generally for subgaussian distributions, albeit with a slightly worse dependence on the privacy parameter. For both estimators, careful preprocessing of the data is required to satisfy differential privacy.


Proxy Convexity: AUnified Framework for the Analysis of Neural Networks Trained by Gradient Descent

Neural Information Processing Systems

Although the optimization objectives for learning neural networks are highly nonconvex, gradient-based methods have been wildly successful at learning neural networks in practice. This juxtaposition has led to a number of recent studies on provable guarantees for neural networks trained by gradient descent. Unfortunately, the techniques in these works are often highly specific to the particular setup in each problem, making it difficult to generalize across different settings. To address this drawback in the literature, we propose a unified non-convex optimization framework for the analysis of neural network training. We introduce the notions of proxy convexity and proxy Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) inequalities, which are satisfied if the original objective function induces a proxy objective function that is implicitly minimized when using gradient methods. We show that stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on objectives satisfying proxy convexity or the proxy PL inequality leads to efficient guarantees for proxy objective functions. We further show that many existing guarantees for neural networks trained by gradient descent can be unified through proxy convexity and proxy PL inequalities.




41da609c519d77b29be442f8c1105647-Supplemental.pdf

Neural Information Processing Systems

A.1 Additional experimental results We further introduce our additional experiments in this section. In our main article, we compared our model FREED with baseline models REINVENT and MORLD. For fairer comparison of quality scores, we also performed multi-objective optimization of REINVENT and MORLD on both quality score (pharmacochemical filter score) and docking score as follows. Table 1 in the main text shows that such an implicit method is not enough to achieve nearly perfect filter scores as our model did. Also, as shown in Table 1 REINVENT showed deteriorated performance when jointly trained with filter scores, in terms of hit ratio and top 5% scores, implying that multiobjective optimization is more difficult than explicitly constrained optimization. Such a result was consistent for all three targets. The two baseline models REINVENT and MORLD that are jointly trained to maximize filter scores are noted as REINVENT w/ filter and MORLD w/ filter.